This wasn't even the big one in Georgia. Running the audit.py from election2020_detective set to 84% skew and .1% so it shows this (lesser) one:
Reporting batches that are over 84.0% (minimum) skewed to one candidate and affected at least 0.1% of the election vote count
Examining georgia.json...
11/03 10:57:52PM QUESTIONABLE: 79237 votes (1.6% of election) with minimum 85% benefit to Biden at 2020-11-04T03:57:52Z in georgia
11/04 12:18:58AM QUESTIONABLE: 23487 votes (0.5% of election) with minimum 98% benefit to Biden at 2020-11-04T05:18:58Z in georgia
11/04 01:12:24AM ANOMALY: Vote count goes down (by 28966 at 2020-11-04T06:12:24Z in georgia
11/04 09:50:36PM ANOMALY: Vote count goes down (by 3242 at 2020-11-05T02:50:36Z in georgia
11/04 09:54:08PM ANOMALY: Vote count goes down (by 1366 at 2020-11-05T02:54:08Z in georgia
Found 2 Biden impactful reports accounting for 101600 votes. Average size 50800
Found 0 Trump impactful reports accounting for 0 votes. Average size N/A
Found 3 anomalies (impossible events)
Notice how this data feed (Edison, a real-time feed of what the news reported) maps to real world fraud. It also finds over 94 impossible events and 30 large-scale unlikely events that moved at least 2,572,902 votes for Biden - and that's at 1% sensitivity, you have to set it to 0.1% to even see this one (but we knew about it, and had checked it about 2 week ago, that's why the lawyers put it into the case).
2 weeks ago we used the Edison feed weeks ago to highlight areas for investigation gave the investigators hundreds of leads. They gave the evidence to the lawyers. That's how Rudy Gulliani has 20 binders full of fraud evidence.
You are not looking at a website. You are reading the feed from the primary battleserver of the Second American Revolution and you, fren, are a part of history.
This wasn't even the big one in Georgia. Running the audit.py from election2020_detective set to 84% skew and .1% so it shows this (lesser) one:
Reporting batches that are over 84.0% (minimum) skewed to one candidate and affected at least 0.1% of the election vote count
Examining georgia.json...
11/03 10:57:52PM QUESTIONABLE: 79237 votes (1.6% of election) with minimum 85% benefit to Biden at 2020-11-04T03:57:52Z in georgia
11/04 12:18:58AM QUESTIONABLE: 23487 votes (0.5% of election) with minimum 98% benefit to Biden at 2020-11-04T05:18:58Z in georgia
11/04 01:12:24AM ANOMALY: Vote count goes down (by 28966 at 2020-11-04T06:12:24Z in georgia
11/04 09:50:36PM ANOMALY: Vote count goes down (by 3242 at 2020-11-05T02:50:36Z in georgia
11/04 09:54:08PM ANOMALY: Vote count goes down (by 1366 at 2020-11-05T02:54:08Z in georgia
Found 2 Biden impactful reports accounting for 101600 votes. Average size 50800
Found 0 Trump impactful reports accounting for 0 votes. Average size N/A
Found 3 anomalies (impossible events)
Notice how this data feed (Edison, a real-time feed of what the news reported) maps to real world fraud. It also finds over 94 impossible events and 30 large-scale unlikely events that moved at least 2,572,902 votes for Biden - and that's at 1% sensitivity, you have to set it to 0.1% to even see this one (but we knew about it, and had checked it about 2 week ago, that's why the lawyers put it into the case).
You can use it yourself, see here: https://thedonald.win/p/11Ql6Ohu4q/the-us-election-results-are-ques/
2 weeks ago we used the Edison feed weeks ago to highlight areas for investigation gave the investigators hundreds of leads. They gave the evidence to the lawyers. That's how Rudy Gulliani has 20 binders full of fraud evidence.
You are not looking at a website. You are reading the feed from the primary battleserver of the Second American Revolution and you, fren, are a part of history.