All of these judges who refuse to acknowledge the mountains of evidence before them -- what happens to them assuming it reaches the Supreme Court and they rule in President Trump's favor?
Perhaps I have maintained a modicum of idealism from my youth -- but some small part of me still believes "fairness" should not allow judges who REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGE EVIDENCE to remain on the bench. Would these judges be included in any charges of treason? Because they are most assuredly aiding and abetting.
But perhaps I am overthinking the issue...or would be a matter of impeaching each individual judge which, would take far too much time, money, and effort.
I would also venture to suggest that the past rulings of each of these judges should be reexamined when this issue of the elections is concluded. They have shown themselves incapable of recognizing truth and dispensing justice. God only know how many innocents have suffered at their hands over the years.
Yes...I have contempt for their courts!
In almost every circumstance, only the legislature has the ability to punish judges, and they've historically been reluctant to do so. When judges make political decisions (PA?) The appropriate remedy is political consequences.
So for example, PA legislature should be impeaching the members of their supreme court that decided that they write the laws.