there are a lot of assumptions, and this is a highly conservative estimate. I'm being upfront about that in my original post.
we could talk all day about other ways in which this could be more accurate, but I have more pressing things to attend to than generating PCA plots of what accounts for the greatest variation in voting deltas, like county urbanification, income, etc. add more voting machines, sure! it only helps our case!
Thanks, I didn't intend my post as a criticism, hope you didn't take it that way. Trying to point out exactly what you just stated - this is a highly conservative estimate. Appreciate your analysis.
there are a lot of assumptions, and this is a highly conservative estimate. I'm being upfront about that in my original post.
we could talk all day about other ways in which this could be more accurate, but I have more pressing things to attend to than generating PCA plots of what accounts for the greatest variation in voting deltas, like county urbanification, income, etc. add more voting machines, sure! it only helps our case!
Thanks, I didn't intend my post as a criticism, hope you didn't take it that way. Trying to point out exactly what you just stated - this is a highly conservative estimate. Appreciate your analysis.
no offense taken at all! thanks!