i'm playing fast & loose with the math. its total population ("the county itself has 36000 people" i thought i was being clear), which is a proxy for # voters (i know full well they arent the same thing, but they should map proportionally)
not everyone votes, of course. that however is unrelated to frequency and delta. re-read what I wrote. The 1/1000 becomes 1/500 when you turn 37 votes into a delta calculation, making it 74, thus, doubling the occurrence from 1/1000 to 1/500.
Perhaps the switching algorithm dynamically does it and it isn't based off the # registered voters (or county population) a priori, though. Who knows. that is just my hunch, that they just use a simple but reasonable metric to base their fraud on. like, if they had expert algorithm writers, they wouldn't be working at dominion, would they? wouldn't they be at google or something? or making video game engines? or brain-machine interface decoders?
they probably hire shitty programmers at dominion that probably wouldn't be able to code a decent dynamic heuristic for undetectable voter fraud. chinese people are CHEAP and wouldn't want to spend much money (source, work with cheap chinese)
It could be even better depending which piece of equipment he's talking about and how many they have. But purely on the 14,218 instead of the approx 36,000 we'd be looking at least double your guesstimate
ah thanks! yeah i don't know where or care to learn how to get those exact #s. So yeah. i'll just have to reiterate my mathematical guess is conservative, and clearly other corrections can simply and reasonably double it!
I could try and decode your mathematics, but id rather just put faith in your skills and chip in what i could since it took me literally 15 seconds to digup the stats i posted :)
i'm playing fast & loose with the math. its total population ("the county itself has 36000 people" i thought i was being clear), which is a proxy for # voters (i know full well they arent the same thing, but they should map proportionally)
not everyone votes, of course. that however is unrelated to frequency and delta. re-read what I wrote. The 1/1000 becomes 1/500 when you turn 37 votes into a delta calculation, making it 74, thus, doubling the occurrence from 1/1000 to 1/500.
Perhaps the switching algorithm dynamically does it and it isn't based off the # registered voters (or county population) a priori, though. Who knows. that is just my hunch, that they just use a simple but reasonable metric to base their fraud on. like, if they had expert algorithm writers, they wouldn't be working at dominion, would they? wouldn't they be at google or something? or making video game engines? or brain-machine interface decoders?
they probably hire shitty programmers at dominion that probably wouldn't be able to code a decent dynamic heuristic for undetectable voter fraud. chinese people are CHEAP and wouldn't want to spend much money (source, work with cheap chinese)
It gets better, i'm very familiar with the Georgia data. I'll let you do your magic but this will help you provide an even better estimate.
In Ware there was...14218 votes in total cast as per the hand-count audit.
Trump / Biden / Jorg / invalid writein / valid writein / overvote 9902 / 4174 / 117 / 16 / 6 / 3
It could be even better depending which piece of equipment he's talking about and how many they have. But purely on the 14,218 instead of the approx 36,000 we'd be looking at least double your guesstimate
ah thanks! yeah i don't know where or care to learn how to get those exact #s. So yeah. i'll just have to reiterate my mathematical guess is conservative, and clearly other corrections can simply and reasonably double it!
"and then we doubled it"
Nod, we're on the same page fren.
I could try and decode your mathematics, but id rather just put faith in your skills and chip in what i could since it took me literally 15 seconds to digup the stats i posted :)
Crowdsourcing and teamwork FTW!