13
Comments (21)
sorted by:
4
Turnerscreek 4 points ago +4 / -0

Barr is getting to the bottom of it. A bucket of KFC that is.

3
PowerWordKek 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ruby Ridge

3
Stoya9186 3 points ago +3 / -0

"He wouldn't find fraud if it was shaped like the only drumstick in a family sized bucket of KFC."

3
Filial_Piety_is_key 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ask him:

If you were able to prevent Trump from a 2nd term, but you needed to commit mass election fraud to do it, but you KNEW 100% you could get away with it, would you do it?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Independenceforever 3 points ago +3 / -0

Show him the Yuri Soviet Defector video where he says "don't waste your time with [demoralized] leftists".

They won't admit the gulag is real til an iron boot crushes their balls.

https://archive.org/details/yuri_bezmenov_all_interviews_lectures_hq_1983_1984

3
undef 3 points ago +3 / -0

I try not to associate with liberals. You should do the same.

3
username20 3 points ago +3 / -0

"wanna bet?"

2
Triplesec 2 points ago +2 / -0

Barr would need to investigate it to find it, they don't go to court on the public testimony of random people. They can't move that fast, and based on the last several months Barr has been around, investigations are really witness intimidation. Trump should have picked a person of action and results.

2
One-Man_Riot 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would respond with this isn’t Barr’s jurisdiction. These suits are going through the civil courts.

2
One-Man_Riot 2 points ago +2 / -0

And I would follow up with for an election meddling is a war crime in his handled in the executive branch via the military.

2
trumpple 2 points ago +2 / -0

they haven't looked

2
tonyson 2 points ago +2 / -0

Invalid premise, since Barr is not ready for this fight

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

DEBOOOOOOONKED.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
hulda824 2 points ago +2 / -0

Barr's DOJ pursues CRIMINAL charges...the ongoing Court cases are CIVIL. We know what is going on in the civil Courts, we do NOT know what's going on with the pursuit of Criminal behavior. (Just bc we do not know what Barr is doing does not mean we can conclude he is doing nothing. What? he's going to let criminals know they are being pursued?) That will have to wait until Civil Cases are concluded. The first item of business is proclaiming DJT the winner of this Election. That's how I would respond. Since you asked.

1
HosMoc 1 point ago +2 / -1

Tell them that isn't what Barr said, because that isn't what Barr said.

1
ftc316 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually Barr himself does not look for the evidence, it is presented to him from agents who investigate and then present findings and recommend action. His statements were taking out of context through MSM yesterday. Not saying I support him and think he is more interested in family bucket of KFC but the next few weeks could change a lot of peoples minds about him or KFC will have a lot less chicken for sale. We shall see.......

1
ColSandersRet 1 point ago +2 / -1

If you don't look for evidence you don't find it.

No US Attorney is not investigating using FBI agents. Per Rudy, his witnesses are not being interviewed. Per one of Kline's witnesses in this PA nightmare, they can't get a US Attorney or the FBI interested. That means the DOJ does not want to investigate.

The DOJ has no evidence because they are not looking for any. It's just like the lap top. No DOJ interest. Barr is part of the swamp IMHO.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0