Oh we cannot go against China, coz it will affect some of our farmers.
Oh we cannot pull out of WHO, because WHO still does some good. It should just be reformed.
Oh we cannot pull out of NAFTA, because it will disrupt the trade relations.
Oh we cannot pull troops out of Middle east, because it will be destabilized and terrorist organizations will take over.
There is sure drawbacks with removal of section 230, but Trump has assessed that the pain is bigger for Big Tech. He is betting that in a war of attrition, they will capitulate first. No pain, no gain.
This has been Trump's play for numerous times now, I am not sure why "pedes" still don't get it.
You're not trading .win for big tech, you're trading the ability to publish freely online for maybe a shot at big tech. And you're doing it when you don't even have to. They're all about to be sued and broken up for antitrust violations. What's strategically incompetent is scorched earth right when the battle has turned in your favor.
This isn't net neutrality. This is asking for a reason to be banned from all sorts of social media as well as rid the internet of places like TD. Think about the people who will be in charge over it and think about how great of a job they've done so far of not banning conservatives.
If it did come into effect and we didn't want to get sued, just have no censorship here and then we can be regarded as a platform rather than a publisher. Simple. Trolls and leftists can just get downvoted into oblivion.
TD.W would definitely be one of the first to go, they would make sure of it. That's just an honest blackpill for everyone.
RINO talk is what they doing.
Oh we cannot go against China, coz it will affect some of our farmers.
Oh we cannot pull out of WHO, because WHO still does some good. It should just be reformed.
Oh we cannot pull out of NAFTA, because it will disrupt the trade relations.
Oh we cannot pull troops out of Middle east, because it will be destabilized and terrorist organizations will take over.
There is sure drawbacks with removal of section 230, but Trump has assessed that the pain is bigger for Big Tech. He is betting that in a war of attrition, they will capitulate first. No pain, no gain.
This has been Trump's play for numerous times now, I am not sure why "pedes" still don't get it.
Old habits die hard
That’s why so many Wall Street rat fucks hate Trump
Fine, you know what, do away with thedonald and every other free speech site. Letting our enemies have what they want is how we win!
Fucking retards. If this goes through you can address apologies to u/obamasloosebutthole, oh wait... we won't be here.
I thought that username was a satire... till I saw his comment not too far below you.
You're not trading .win for big tech, you're trading the ability to publish freely online for maybe a shot at big tech. And you're doing it when you don't even have to. They're all about to be sued and broken up for antitrust violations. What's strategically incompetent is scorched earth right when the battle has turned in your favor.
Excellent summary here about the issue.
Section 230 Safe Harbor summary. Recent past, actions, future.
Yeah no shit.
Whatever you say, bud. I'll wait for you to realize this will only make censorship worse.
Agreed. It may take a while, but free speech will allow for a better marketplace of thought and ideas.
You think suddenly everything won't be only used against us like it has for decades? Wish I had that optimism.
Similar things were said about net neutrality
This isn't net neutrality. This is asking for a reason to be banned from all sorts of social media as well as rid the internet of places like TD. Think about the people who will be in charge over it and think about how great of a job they've done so far of not banning conservatives.
If it did come into effect and we didn't want to get sued, just have no censorship here and then we can be regarded as a platform rather than a publisher. Simple. Trolls and leftists can just get downvoted into oblivion.
Wrong because the protection for platforms is in section 230 safe harbor. Your plan relies on section 230.
Section 230 Safe Harbor summary. Recent past, actions, future.
Well just edit it so that platforms are protected and publishers aren't.