7418 Very sadly for our Nation, it looks like Senator @JimInhofe will not be putting the Section 230 termination clause into the Defense Bill. So bad for our National Security and Election Integrity. Last chance to ever get it done. I will VETO! (twitter.com) 🦅 Trump Tweet 🦅 posted 132 days ago by StableGeniusTrump 132 days ago by StableGeniusTrump +7419 / -1 647 comments share 647 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (647) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 4 ▼ – KeepCoom 4 points 132 days ago +4 / -0 Wait, why does Trump want Section 230 repealed so bad? Isn't that bad for sites like TDW? Is modification not an option here? Someone explain this to me. permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – deleted 3 points 132 days ago +3 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – Foletado 1 point 132 days ago +1 / -0 When it comes to this, yes they are. Repealing 230 would harm small sites especially. Section 230 Safe Harbor summary. Recent past, actions, future. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – KeepCoom 1 point 132 days ago +1 / -0 So...is he publicly announcing it to lead them into another trap? or is he earnestly pursuing tthe removal of sec 230? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Slothboy 1 point 132 days ago +1 / -0 I think it's a "big ask". Start high and accept reform permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Foletado 1 point 132 days ago +1 / -0 When you make a big ask, it is not usually something which would be self destructive if granted. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Foletado 1 point 132 days ago +1 / -0 Section 230 Safe Harbor summary. Recent past, actions, future. permalink parent save report block reply
Wait, why does Trump want Section 230 repealed so bad? Isn't that bad for sites like TDW?
Is modification not an option here? Someone explain this to me.
When it comes to this, yes they are. Repealing 230 would harm small sites especially.
Section 230 Safe Harbor summary. Recent past, actions, future.
So...is he publicly announcing it to lead them into another trap? or is he earnestly pursuing tthe removal of sec 230?
I think it's a "big ask".
Start high and accept reform
When you make a big ask, it is not usually something which would be self destructive if granted.
Section 230 Safe Harbor summary. Recent past, actions, future.