In my ideal rule the site would be able to choose and would simply be more or less restricted in their behavior based on that choice. There should also be some kind of safe harbor provision and reasonable time given to take down bad content, like with DMCA.
Yes like law breaking things. Fan page for child sex? No. Fan page for Trump. Leave it alone. Fan page for Leftrds? Leave alone. So reddit and Facebook can't delete groups that are legal. Plotting terrorism.. fine? Then fine them after warning? Donate fine to children burn hospital.
.win would be considered a publisher as well. This site wouldn’t last a day before being sued into oblivion by trolls.
There needs to be a new category that is not a platform or publisher.
In my ideal rule the site would be able to choose and would simply be more or less restricted in their behavior based on that choice. There should also be some kind of safe harbor provision and reasonable time given to take down bad content, like with DMCA.
Follow the rules of the constitution you’re free from 230... once you start to deviate from the constitution, you’re a publisher
Yes like law breaking things. Fan page for child sex? No. Fan page for Trump. Leave it alone. Fan page for Leftrds? Leave alone. So reddit and Facebook can't delete groups that are legal. Plotting terrorism.. fine? Then fine them after warning? Donate fine to children burn hospital.