Because big tech are the ones that secretly want it removed is my guess. If 230 is removed the wrong way, big tech would be the only internet forum survivors.
Or leave 230 in place, and let Facebook and Twitter censor everyone until their platforms are an empty wasteland of Chinese bots and everyone has moved on to other sites.
I don't know why 230 even matters. The law trump should be creating is one that prevents them censoring any content at all
Because big tech are the ones that secretly want it removed is my guess. If 230 is removed the wrong way, big tech would be the only internet forum survivors.
FB wouldn't be the ones suing other publishers. It would be governments enforcing these laws on smaller publishers.
For FB, I don't know. But, for Twitter, YouTube, even Amazon, I could see them benefitting from this while other websites are hurt by it.
Or leave 230 in place, and let Facebook and Twitter censor everyone until their platforms are an empty wasteland of Chinese bots and everyone has moved on to other sites.
That's just not going to happen. We coined the term too big to fail for a reason
When only the lemmings remain, misinformed and mushbrained, then mission is accomplished.
Take responsibility for the businesses you support. Leave the abusive ones, to wither on the vine of irrelevance, like they deserve.
The sole reason we are in this predicament is herd mentality social media addicts. Don’t be one yourself.
Naive suggestion. The service would be flooded with illegal content, absent any moderation.
The solution you are looking for is simple: leave the abusive service.
Only use services that treat you fairly. Read the fine print before agreeing to the terms of service next time.