so i don't know where else to post this, but i kinda think this is big .
I'm listening to Coast to Coast Am with george noory and he announced his guess Jerome Corsi is going to explain how the election was stolen
the guy is pimping his book about it, but th thing is that coast to coast am is the most listened to radio show on the planet .
When george Noory started his monologue/introduction he keep tripping over his words, hesitating , and sounding nervous . Noory has been a news person radio host for like 50 years, theres no way he'd trip up that bad
all the points that Corsi is talking about is pretty much everything talked about here and pol
million and millions of people listen to Coast to Coast religiously . Im thinking this is huge
Cool. Did Corsi do a good job? The Q folks consider him controlled opposition. He tried to hijack the Q movement as a “Q decoder”. Started to get popular with fairly decent and well researched Q decodes. Then over the weeks started doing more and more self-promotion for his books. Started to go on non-Q related tangents. Would produce these long videos where he rambled on about nonsense, gossip, and in-fighting in the Q community for the first half an hour, then did only a quick recap of Q posts at the end of the video, and would then start doing incorrect decodes, leading people to false conclusions. Eventually Q called him out, indirectly, and Corsi had a meltdown, disavowing Q, and going after him. It was a pretty crazy over reaction where Corsi made himself look more guilty by taking so much offense to what Q said.
Anyway, everyone just be alert to these tactics. Controlled opposition will start off saying what you want to hear, then will gradually try to divert your attention to irrelevant tangents, group in-fighting, or incorrect conclusions. If called out, they tend to wildly overreact with guilt. If caught, they will go all out trying to destroy their target. When that fails, they slink away for a few months and then come back and try to re-establish credibility as controlled opposition. These people seem to be controlled by CIA or Mossad. Often before they return to reclaim their credibility they are represented as the underdog in some censorship battle. This makes people think they must really be fighting the man. But usually the censorship is only temporary and they are reinstalled on their platforms. An example of this would be to have someone get their Twitter deleted, make it a story for a day, then reinstate it. Now they seem more credible because “Big Tech tried to shut them down”. But it was really all a con.
so i don't know where else to post this, but i kinda think this is big .
I'm listening to Coast to Coast Am with george noory and he announced his guess Jerome Corsi is going to explain how the election was stolen
the guy is pimping his book about it, but th thing is that coast to coast am is the most listened to radio show on the planet .
When george Noory started his monologue/introduction he keep tripping over his words, hesitating , and sounding nervous . Noory has been a news person radio host for like 50 years, theres no way he'd trip up that bad
all the points that Corsi is talking about is pretty much everything talked about here and pol
million and millions of people listen to Coast to Coast religiously . Im thinking this is huge
any thoughts
Cool. Did Corsi do a good job? The Q folks consider him controlled opposition. He tried to hijack the Q movement as a “Q decoder”. Started to get popular with fairly decent and well researched Q decodes. Then over the weeks started doing more and more self-promotion for his books. Started to go on non-Q related tangents. Would produce these long videos where he rambled on about nonsense, gossip, and in-fighting in the Q community for the first half an hour, then did only a quick recap of Q posts at the end of the video, and would then start doing incorrect decodes, leading people to false conclusions. Eventually Q called him out, indirectly, and Corsi had a meltdown, disavowing Q, and going after him. It was a pretty crazy over reaction where Corsi made himself look more guilty by taking so much offense to what Q said.
Anyway, everyone just be alert to these tactics. Controlled opposition will start off saying what you want to hear, then will gradually try to divert your attention to irrelevant tangents, group in-fighting, or incorrect conclusions. If called out, they tend to wildly overreact with guilt. If caught, they will go all out trying to destroy their target. When that fails, they slink away for a few months and then come back and try to re-establish credibility as controlled opposition. These people seem to be controlled by CIA or Mossad. Often before they return to reclaim their credibility they are represented as the underdog in some censorship battle. This makes people think they must really be fighting the man. But usually the censorship is only temporary and they are reinstalled on their platforms. An example of this would be to have someone get their Twitter deleted, make it a story for a day, then reinstate it. Now they seem more credible because “Big Tech tried to shut them down”. But it was really all a con.
i thought he did pretty good cause pretty much every thing he said is the shit i read here and on pol and conservative twitter
he did shill his ebook of course, but he also thougfhrly explained the paths for Trump to win and its everything thats been said here .
but i think what kind of got me and why i made the first post is the audience of coast to coast is really massive .
i mean, coast to coast goes into lizard people and fairies and shit, but thats what made it popular back with Art Bell
to me, this is mainstream media , cause we aint hearing this shit anywhere else
what would you like me to link ?