774
Comments (41)
sorted by:
28
Zskills 28 points ago +28 / -0

"I gotta ENTER all these absentee ballots"

WTF? Enter? They're BLANK!

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
27
UnmaskedPatriot 27 points ago +27 / -0

"I was off for 10 days, but I didn't like how things were goin', so now I'm back and ready to work".

Not suspicious.

2
brutustyberius 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s hard work stealing elections.

22
Winter_Is_Coming2020 22 points ago +23 / -1

If she’s on vid pulling suitcase (or present when they are pulled), she’s fucked anyway, but thanks Ruby for filming evidence of your crimes - they were prob printed in China or New York.

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
16
Italiano1976 16 points ago +16 / -0

She took off for ten days to go on Walmart shopping sprees with her payoff bribes. Making videos of her workplace shows how out of touch with reality she is. Like most Democrats.

14
Smellsfishy 14 points ago +14 / -0

ThIS HaS bEeN DebOonkEd!!!!!

13
DT_2020 13 points ago +13 / -0

Why would you film yourself committing treason?

2
_Eric_Ciaramella_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

because black people don't face penalties

3
CertainlyNotEdward 3 points ago +4 / -1

because black people democrat party operatives don't face penalties

FTFY.

2
_Eric_Ciaramella_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

yuge correction!

13
Trump4allz 13 points ago +13 / -0

Criminals are fucking stupid

9
FRONT_TOWARD_LEFT 9 points ago +9 / -0

A retired police detective once told me that if criminals weren't so fucking stupid that the solution and conviction rate would hover right above zero as a function of pure luck.

1
CertainlyNotEdward 1 point ago +2 / -1

That just tells me that there's a lot of intelligent sociopaths that never get caught. Also that police detectives are nearly worthless for stopping important crimes.

10
Pinpatch 10 points ago +10 / -0

Was this election night? Time of recording is 11.40 pm ish, an hour after counting was 'closed'

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
grassshrimp 6 points ago +6 / -0

Stop the video at 2:05, you'll see a ballot in a box with no return address. That's what I've saw so far.

6
TakingCoatsWIN 6 points ago +6 / -0

at 2:04 look at the envelopes in the basket.

They are supposed to have addresses of the people who sent them in. They are all blank.

1
cciv 1 point ago +1 / -0

All? I only see one.

4
Bogey 4 points ago +4 / -0

To play devil's advocate, it's entirely possible the voter sent it back without placing a return address. Unadvisable, but possible. Voters tend to not follow instructions well.

4
brutustyberius 4 points ago +4 / -0

0.3% rejection rate. This is why.

1
Xanisor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are those ballots still valid without return address?

1
Bogey 1 point ago +1 / -0

The return address is a postal issue. You're supposed to put a return address in case the mail is damaged or undeliverable. Technically the identifying info is inside that envelope.

3
ALT26 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fuck these people.

3
toolfan001 3 points ago +3 / -0

This video is really just hwr showing us her rope! I'll never understand why people video their own criminality. Of course, with Barr and Wray there are no consequences.

3
maganify 3 points ago +3 / -0

And no postage date stamp

3
NoSaint 3 points ago +4 / -1

Looks real secure. Ballots everywhere. No chain of custody. No oversight...

3
Russianhoneypot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ruby Suitcase 😂.

2
Bellababeala 2 points ago +2 / -0

Archive, download this before she deletes it!!!!!

2
Ldyluna 2 points ago +2 / -0

Much as I hate to say it, this video contains no actionable evidence. Zuckerberg funded the drop boxes in the metro areas --- no postage necessary meaning no postage mark.

No return address? Not required on the outside envelope.

No chain of custody? Unprovable from from this clip.

The only charge that would apply is that the worker was alone, presumably getting ready to separate the inner envelope from the outer envelope and verify signatures (not) without watcher, challenger or bipartisan poll worker eyes to verify. Unfortunately, she didn't film herself actually opening an envelope.

Alas, not a smoking gun.

2
Iowaska 2 points ago +2 / -0

“I have to enter all these absentee ballots” she admitted to either entering them into the poll book or opening them. The fact that it doesn’t have an address is suspicious, bc how can she enter it into the poll? And shouldn’t they already be in the poll? They were sent an absentee ballot. So she opened them alone? Either way... suspicious.

1
Ldyluna 1 point ago +1 / -0

Suspicious? Yes, I agree. Evidence that she has (at the time of the video) violated GA election law? Not in the video that we saw.

The ballots visible in the video are the outer envelopes. The relevant voter data and signature are found on the inside envelope. If she actually opened one and separated a ballot from the inside envelope then she would have violated GA law.

2
Jd428jd 2 points ago +2 / -0

She is on WIFI. Kinda weird. Is she even supposed to have a phone? Maybe it does not matter on the recount?

1
HunterForRedOctober 1 point ago +1 / -0

I early voted in Michigan so not sure if Georgia has the same process. But early voting was filling out an absentee ballot there and then dropping it into a city/county drop box. Since I wasn’t mailing it I didn’t write in the return address. You name and contact info were on the inside I think. Or maybe on the back. Either way my guess is that the we’re “early” votes that could be legitimate if Georgia used the same process.

1
Singledout66 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dumbest criminals

1
MeanMisterMustardCap 1 point ago +1 / -0

WHY DO THEY ALWAYS LOOK LIKE THIS?