753
Comments (28)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-2
iamherefortheluls -2 points ago +4 / -6

... masks are asked to be worn to reduce transmission rate from the sick person to others. Similar how in surgery, masks are worn to prevent transmission to the vulnerable patient being operated on, not to protect the staff from the patient.

Doctors always said that they offer negligible protection to the wearer... which this study confirms.

In no way however does it dismantle the pro-mask narrative.

4
chadenfreude_ 4 points ago +4 / -0

In unrealistically ideal circumstances that may be true. Unrealistically ideal means surgical grade masks that are worn once then disposed of, and not contaminated by touching your mask.

Do you know anyone who only uses surgical grade masks, once per outing, and never touches their face? No, you don’t.

So instead, masks are acting as disease incubators people wear in the most vulnerable possible place, that they’re constantly loading up handfuls of contamination and spreading it to every.single.thing. they touch.

2
iamherefortheluls 2 points ago +2 / -0

to be clear, i am not arguing myself in favor of masks.

i am saying this study does not dispute the MSM narrative.

1
chadenfreude_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Feel free to cite my reply to dispute the MSM narrative. If someone demands a source to my claim (the only fact that someone could errantly dispute is that viruses survive longer on warm wet fabric), please refer them to a 5th grade science textbook, any edition should do.