1083
Comments (83)
sorted by:
83
thunderpussy 83 points ago +84 / -1

Remember black folks, Melinda Gates says you are up next in line for a vaccine that was developed using a completely novel and untested approach, after health care workers and the elderly get their shots....

Let that sink in.

25
deleted 25 points ago +26 / -1
7
trump2036 7 points ago +7 / -0

CNN: Good news everybody! You don't need to get vasectomies anymore

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
67
sun_wolf 67 points ago +67 / -0

Did this go out live? Seems like the other guy realized he had just accidentally let the whole plot slip. They have been talking about this for years. Population control. They have decided they only want a population of 500 million in the future. There are 8 billion now. That means they need to sterilize a significant portion of the population. This may also be the revenge of the Epstein Pedophile Crew. Bill Gates allegedly went to that island and partook of children at least 17 times. Podesta was going to be Secretary of State, now he is exposed. Epstein is dead. Maxwell is arrested. Epstein Island has been raided and destroyed. The child trafficking rings are being dug up and arrested. The child porn sites are being dismantled. The pedophiles are FURIOUS. Would this not be their obvious revenge? “You won’t let us rape your children? Fine, bigots. Then we will sterilize them all. No more kids for anyone!”

48
donotclickjim 48 points ago +48 / -0

Makes sense on a spiritual level too. God commanded humans to "be fruitful and multiply" (Genesis 1:28). To sterilize large populations would fit in with the occultist agenda.

6
BidenHunter 6 points ago +7 / -1

^^100%

21
GnosticAwakening 21 points ago +21 / -0

The truth is absurd, but their goal is to create a slave planet of mostly high functioning vaccinated autists to usher in the age of transhumanism and turn them into gods.

The "useless" will be sterilized, and those who resist will die of C21.

They can only be understood using the logic of a psychopath.

3
Red_Hibiscus 3 points ago +3 / -0

That, or the price of kids is so diluted because there’s so many available. Less kids being born drives up the cost, the evil make more money then.

48
RodRod 48 points ago +56 / -8

In Microbiology the term 'sterilize' is synonymous with 'disinfect'. e.g. you sterilize surgical instrument.

43
T__X 43 points ago +43 / -0

And neither seems to be the right term in the context of a vaccine. A vaccine just trains your immune system to be able to react sufficiently to deal with a future exposure. It doesn't itself "disinfect" you from the virus if you already have it.

For the term "disinfect" or "sterilize" to be appropriate, they would need to be talking about a treatment that eliminates the virus from people who already have the virus. Does this "vaccine" do that?

I don't necessarily think this means he was talking about making people infertile, although I wouldn't be too surprised if he was. But something definitely doesn't hang together about what he said.

27
loopypoopy 27 points ago +27 / -0

This mother fucker just said we should all inject bleach! /s

13
T__X 13 points ago +13 / -0

Good point. The way the left always goes rabid over technicality gotchas on Trump - taking what he says literally and intentionally missing the point he was clearly trying to make.

Why should I give these assholes the benefit of the doubt? They LITERALLY said (and boy how the left loves the term "literally") "sterilize" 70-80 percent of the population. We should make them choke on it.

1
Wsemenske 1 point ago +2 / -1

Nah this is a nothing burger, just because others are idiots doesn't mean we should be. By all means use this if you want to fight back, but I'm gonna file this one in the junk folder

21
reckoningSE 21 points ago +21 / -0

I'm skeptical.

I hadn't heard of this term being used in epidemiology (i.e., to measure a vaccine's effectiveness). The way you phrased it doesn't make sense -- vaccines don't disinfect people (in fact, the exact opposite).

I did turn up hits that the phrase "sterilizing immunity" is in common use. However, I don't see it used in this context (with a percentage) either. A vaccine either produces sterilizing immunity, or it doesn't. It's not a population-level measure.

spez: example MSM article where this is talked about in context of the CCP virus: https://thehill.com/changing-america/well-being/prevention-cures/501677-what-is-sterilizing-immunity-and-do-we-need-it

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
14
Anonimouse2 14 points ago +14 / -0

Gates' polio vaccine re-introduced polio.

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2019/11/15/779865471/polio-vaccine-may-be-preventing-the-end-of-polio

Are we certain that a more deadly strain of Sars-Cov-2 will not be the result of a "vaccine"?

9
HatnNewLognReqs 9 points ago +9 / -0

For you to understand the answer to this, you need to understand the differences in vaccine platforms.

Vaccination with a live virus that is weakened enough to induce immunity but not cause significant disease symptoms (polio live attenuated oral vax) is vastly different than vaccination with mRNA or protein subunits which train the immune system to recognize the most abundant and/or long term immunity inducing pieces of the virus (covid and others). These subunits are incapable of completing and replicating a live virus and thus spreading virus to anyone.

These are just a few of the ways to make a vaccine. There are dozens of platforms with the ability to be specific for millions of different viral components.

5
Anonimouse2 5 points ago +5 / -0

After looking at the risks of sars-cov-2 versus the risks of mRNA side effects, I would rather build an immunity naturally than artificially.

https://www.phgfoundation.org/briefing/rna-vaccines

3
HatnNewLognReqs 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah... if this was a real problem, I'd weigh the seriousness of vaccine side effects vs natural immunity.

But there's no point in getting the shot unless you're in a high risk group. If you are, then you need to weigh any potential risks of the vaccine, and bear in mind that these are the most rushed vaccine development in history with no liability on the part of the manufacturers.

3
Anonimouse2 3 points ago +3 / -0

The last sentence of your last paragraph is one reson to not trust these vaccines.

3
HatnNewLognReqs 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup. I work in the field and it bothers me immensely.

3
pepe_patriot_1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can you please link me to a study or article about viruses being alive? This is the first time I’ve heard of a live virus

Btw, I believe in terrain theory and not germ theory so I’m being 100% genuine in this request

3
HatnNewLognReqs 3 points ago +3 / -0

The term 'live virus' in virology is a little misleading. What it means is that it is capable of infecting, replicating itself, and spreading.

Viruses aren't really 'alive' per se because viruses don't metabolize and they require host cells and cellular components to fulfill their replication cycle. Viruses are kinda like parasitic robots.

3
Anonimouse2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Given that explanation, what would happen when all, or a majority, of a person's cells "become the virus" after the introduction of the mRNA?

Would they metastasize like cancer and start to destroy the "host"?

No experience in the field of virology, wanting to learn.

3
HatnNewLognReqs 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, cells don't become the virus.

Not all cells get infected by viruses. They have preference for cells that have components that help them to finish their life cycle, spread, and avoid detection.

Viruses are like programmed robots. You have to consider what they're programmed to do: Replicate and spread by any means necessary. So they take from their environment, turn things on and off in a cell to avoid detection, all kinds of things... some viruses can cause cancer but not all viruses do.

If you're a fan of terrain theory (which btw thanks for that - not really taught in grad school), then you're gonna wanna understand how the immune system responds to a virus. Germ vs terrain theories are saying viruses cause disease vs the state of the immune system causes disease. Both are true. There are virus mediated pathologies and immune mediated pathologies to various degrees on a cellular, tissue, and system level.

Its pretty complicated. Have you got 5 years? Lol...

1
pepe_patriot_1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok that’s a fair clarification

I diverge from you a bit at the end. I believe the body produces the virus to clean the toxins, which explains the “parasitic robot” So when you see the “spreading” it’s actually cells producing the virus. And I believe that’s why viruses are pleomorphic. For example, you wouldn’t blame firefighters for the house burning down right? Guilty by association when they’re just trying to help clean the body. I’m not a virologist. I’m just fascinated by the subject. so this is just me finding a theory that Does a better job of explaining what I see in the real world than what CNN and the media tell me. I regularly am around sick people and never “catch” their virus/sickness/germs etc. whenever I’ve been sick it’s because I stayed up til 5 drinking and sniffing yay when it’s 5 degrees out in January with a t short waiting in line for some shit bar

But from your comment above, I believe injecting the virus into people is why you see people “getting a virus” Like how did the media and everyone know to start looking for Covid when only a handle full of people had died from it? Were their symptoms so deadly that the doctors could instantly tell it was for sure Covid? Or, was it actually because they introduced it into the yearly flu shot? And then months later they could start testing for it? Make no mistake, I think the hysteria of Covid was all planned. The reason they call it swine flu, or from a bat makes no sense. They just realized calling it Spanish flu or Chinese flu was “racist”. They “caught it” from being injected with it. Like we don’t have our dogs wearing masks. Because they can’t catch germs from humans

This book, “what really makes you ill” was really eye opening for me if you’re interested in a good read with LOTS of downtime 😂

2
HatnNewLognReqs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damn. I was halfway through my reply and backed out of the screen. Kmn. Take 2.

This is a lot to unpack.

  1. Not sure what you mean by "body produces virus to cleanse the toxins" Firstly, viruses and toxins are two different types of entities. Second, the cells of the body don't choose to make viruses. Viruses hijack cellular machinery and components to self-reproduce and spread.

  2. Viral spreading is virus mediated, not cell mediated. Again, hijacking. Different viruses employ different mechanisms. Sadly, my examples and analogies were lost. I'm very upset lol

  3. Not sure what processes you're associating viral pleiomorphism with.

  4. Your "conspiracy theories" are a bit more conspiracy than science. I've got my tinfoil hat on, don't worry. But you can release, spread, report on a virus on a coordinated manner without directly injecting people with covid via a flu shot. The reason that doesn't fly can be demonstrated by the length of the transmission cycle of the virus between individuals and length of life cycle within the host, case incidences not correlating with flu shots, the tests that can differentiate (when done correctly) between viral particles currently in the body vs signs of a past infection due to antibodies.

  5. Crap, where was I... covid hysteria wad planned, I agree

  6. The bat and swine designations come from whatever natural animal host the virus came from prior to jumping into humans, e.g. being able to become infectious to humans.

  7. Yes, your dog can catch germs from humans. And people catch shit from animals all the time. Cats, bats, and rats are notorious for transmitting diseases to humans. But nobidy gives a shit about dogs catching a cold. Nobody should give a shit about people catching a cold. We have an immune system that has adapted to respond efficiently to viral hijackers over time.

  8. I recommend Murray's Medical Microbiology, Janeway's Immunobiology, and Parham's Immune System. Peter Parham is a genius when it comes to his work with MHC molecules and the co-evolution of human populations with viruses.

1
pepe_patriot_1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m just going to preface and say everything you just listed did nothing to convince me that germs and Viruses are contagious. With that being said, I enjoy the topic so I appreciate your response.

1 I don’t think I implied viruses and toxins were the same. I said that cells produce viruses to eliminate the toxins from the body. They’ve gone by many names, but microzymas is one of the first terms given

“ Bacteria are non-toxic, and non-virulent as long as body secretions and excretions are normal. When toxemia exists, that is, when metabolic wastes accumulate in the system in excess, causing the secretions and excretions of the body to become abnormal and poisonous, a non-pathogenic bacterium can turn into a so-called pathogenic one simply by feeding on toxic wastes. ” Dr Virginia Vetrano

^ I have a bunch of similar quotes that explain a similar mechanism that exists.

2 Let’s say that point number 2 is true. I’m ok with being wrong. But why is it that no viruses have fulfilled all of Koch’s postulates? You say viral spreading is viral mediated and not cell mediated, but we already see headlines saying after you’ve “had Covid twice” you’re no longer contagious. Or the “Covid with asymptotic symptoms” phenomenon

3 I don’t think I tried to associate any processes with pleomorphism. I should have branched that thought into a different point. My point to pleomorphic viruses is that it explains why this “year’s flu is worse than last year’s flu” propaganda. It’s a flu, but are expressed differently depending on the environment

4 It’s not a conspiracy theory. There are plenty of scientists who believe this, but clearly not a majority. That’s why it’s called terrain theory. And why I prefaced by saying I don’t believe germ theory

“... report on a virus on a coordinated manner without directly injecting people with covid via a flu shot.”

I’m not trying to prove Covid alone was injected into people and why it exists. But it’s an explanation for why the polio found in the US is different than the polio in the “wild” in tribes that do not have access to vaccines. Just as you confirmed, a virus test exists to test the anti-bodies. Which are used in the shot

6 and 7 Similar to number 2. I’m not aware of any mechanism that allows for “catching” something from animals. I’d be happy for evidence of the contrary since it’s apparently so common. I’ve never caught a flu or cold from any animal I’ve ever owned in life. And I’m 30. That’s a long time to be around animals and not catch a cold from even one animal. And I let those fuckers lick my face after licking their asses. Sure, catch some fleas, or maybe you accidentally touch their poop and then you get an infection. Maybe even the squirrel with rabies bites you. But I’m not aware of any situation in which I can catch a cold from a dog walking by me from breathing their air exhaled from their nose.

8 thanks I’ll look into those

“... molecules and the co-evolution of human populations with viruses.” <—— pleomorphic viruses

Like I said, I appreciate your response. It fascinates me. But there’s absolutely 0 chance I’ll ever concede on my “conspiracy theory” when there is plenty of research supporting terrain theory. I believe Galileo was even mocked for not believing the earth was the center of the universe at one point. Now he gets the final laugh from his grave and his science is “accepted”

5
de9ebkmd7 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah that was my thought, words often have multiple or precise technical meanings in scientific and engineering contexts.

4
Skogin 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don’t buy it.

1
zooty 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. And in this case that's not the correct one.

https://www.immune.org.nz/vaccines/efficiency-effectiveness#:~:text=Vaccine%20efficacy%20and%20effectiveness%20are,use%20in%20the%20general%20population.

I don't believe he intended to use that word and the 60-70% is surely related to how effective the vaccine will be in use but it's very interesting that that word did slip in there.

24
BorisWave 24 points ago +24 / -0

The "OH SHIT" look on the interviewers face at the end when he realises what the guy said.

20
Thingthing22 20 points ago +20 / -0

Would the sterilization be hereditary?

26
ProfessorRomendev 26 points ago +27 / -1

It wouldn’t matter cause a sterilized person can’t have kids

10
deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
11
T__X 11 points ago +11 / -0

There's probably a federal grant funding a study somewhere to look into it as we speak...

5
uzi5v2 5 points ago +5 / -0

AOC is that you?

3
Tuarac 3 points ago +3 / -0

love it!!

20
Drinkup4 20 points ago +22 / -2

Sterilization was the Nazi's first plan for the Jews, but they decided that would be impractical and take to long to get rid of them.

17
Shalomtoyou 17 points ago +17 / -0

I remember once reading the laws the Nazis were passing, gradually, limiting the rights of Jews. Can't hold this job, can't hold that, can't take this.

But the creepiest one was: "Such and such date is the last day Jews will be permitted to have children."

3
deleted 3 points ago +7 / -4
6
Anon1970 6 points ago +7 / -1

Democrats sterilized people, not 'we'.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +5 / -6
2
Anon1970 2 points ago +3 / -1

Just, no...

15
CALI_MAGA_MAMA 15 points ago +15 / -0

Pretty sure i read somewhere that bill gates was in trouble in india for "accidentally" sterilizing a bunch of girls with vaccinations.

2
nonUSdonalder 2 points ago +2 / -0

as far as i know, he paralyzed them..

1
CALI_MAGA_MAMA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay, so still don't take a bill gates vaccine. 👍

2
nonUSdonalder 2 points ago +2 / -0

wise words to live by :)

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
12
CzechForTrump 12 points ago +12 / -0

Doesn't he mean "immunization"?

11
Skogin 11 points ago +11 / -0

TRUNINANASHABADAPREZURE!

9
BlmAnimalFarmFodder 9 points ago +9 / -0

Oh so, they only want to PARTIALLY commit genocide.

I see Theodore Kaufman's 1941 book "Germany MUST Perish" where he called for the destruction of the German people through sterilization is still on the table.

9
Anonimouse2 9 points ago +9 / -0

Remember the Gates' polio "vaccine" in Africa spread polio derived from something meant to stop polio.

"One of the biggest obstacles this year is the proliferation of so-called "vaccine-derived" polio outbreaks."

http s://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2019/11/15/779865471/polio-vaccine-may-be-preventing-the-end-of-polio

8
BillBarrsSkelatons 8 points ago +8 / -0

*seasonal too

7
latsbruh 7 points ago +7 / -0

De population has been discussed for decades, they have an excuse to do it and not get blamed.

6
TAIWANNUMBERONE 6 points ago +6 / -0

Now look up what the white percentage of the population in America is and you have your answer.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
0
Thanagor 0 points ago +1 / -1

Surrendering the West's achievements such as vaccines to the left without a fight isn't how we win wars.

Vaccines at a conceptual level are immensely beneficial tools we have to fight the 1st or 2nd greatest killer in human history (take your pick on whether tyranny or disease takes 1st slot). The fact that it is open to corruption, abuse, etc. simply places vaccines right up there with government, etc. as must-have tools we must deny our adversaries with regular vigilence, real expertise, and unflinching ownership over.

Treat vaccines like you'd treat your voting system - make it transparent, voluntary, and fully auditable as a precondition to acceptance. That is all.

Edit: I want to say I don't intrinsically disagree with where you're coming from. I think Alex Jones and those like him have earned immense credibility as 'canaries in the coal mine' warning of outlier influences, corruption, etc. the rest of the population fell asleep to for decades until it was nearly too late. With that being said, I don't think we need to accept the premise the left presents and we can outright deny their claims to our culture, education, films, vaccines, media, etc. by actually moving past 'conserving' what is right and moving to proactively lay out our own standards that must be met as a precondition to any acceptance/consumption above all else. This idea springs from how the founders treated the British government's attempts to inflict Tyranny - it's not about the degree of abuse, its about whether or not the government can both execute power and determine the limits of their power - the resulting abuses are non-negotiable with that reality in play and its why they went bananas about TEA, lol. I'm on board with fighting the tyranny, but I'd like to pursuade you and others to fight to expell tyranny from what is rightfully ours (what our ancestors made and gifted to us) rather than simply fighting to cede any ground lost with the aim of expelling tyranny.

4
Tuarac 4 points ago +4 / -0

so we're living thru Utopia now? I guess life does imitate art...

4
CALI_MAGA_MAMA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh, that's why Obama wants to take it on live tv. He's old and doesn't want to have kids anyway.

4
2ndenthusiast 4 points ago +4 / -0

i didn't think i could be shocked again, but here we are. this must be what made sidney powell go absolutely livid.

4
pepperconchobhar 4 points ago +4 / -0

My daughter is a millennial. Right now there's a quiet conversation happening between the ladies of that generation.

Girls who got the Gardasil vaccine are having a MUCH harder time making babies than the ones who didn't.

Right now, this conversation is happening in the back rooms of the internet. Nobody has proof, but they're sharing their experiences. My daughter has started asking the young women on infertility groups in normie web if they had the shot and a LOT are saying that they did.

The primary cause of infertility for these girls is ovarian failure. They're going into premature menopause. This problem doesn't just jack up their reproductive ability. They're genuinely sick. They're having the problems of menopausal women. Irregular to no periods, osteoporosis, hair loss where you want it, serious hair growth where you don't, skin dryness, dryness of the mucosal membranes (usually diagnosed as Sjogren's Syndrome), unexplained weight gain and depressed metabolism, depressed sex drive... Other weird one is that their vitamin d status remains depressed even with supplementation. I don't get that one, but I do know this is a problem with older women.

I didn't get that shot for my daughter. But my best friend did. Her daughter is a few years younger than mine and is now chronically ill and infertile. She's only 25.

What the hell are we doing to our kids?

And I don't think that this generation's issues are all caused by vaccines. (I'm not even sure if these girls are suffering from a vaccine reaction, but I wouldn't doubt it.) They're the sickest generation of humans to EVER LIVE. Type two diabetes kicking in when they're still kids, autoimmune disease, and early-onset Alzheimer's Disease are all on the rise.

EARLY ONSET ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE! ALZHEIMER'S that kicks in before these kids turn THIRTY!

Every year the boys sperm count drops by another percent... And that ones been going on for awhile now. The males of all Western nations will be infertile in less than a generation if this doesn't stop soon. And I don't see anyone even looking into it!

Yeah. I'm freaking out. Tens of millions of young people are sick as dogs and we don't know exactly why. Our bodies have been under assault since the 1940's by 'better living through chemistry' and I don't know if we can fix it in time.

It would help if somebody would FUCKING INVESTIGATE THESE PROBLEMS.

4
ThaDtothaOtothaN 4 points ago +4 / -0

My work is first in line to get them this month luckily they will not make it mandatory so I declined.

3
ProudlyConservative 3 points ago +3 / -0

WTF!!?; 🤔🙄😣

3
Madhax47 3 points ago +3 / -0

How about we shoot the vaccine to mars and hang Bill Gates instead

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
2Kings616 1 point ago +1 / -0

Holy cow.

1
iSignedUpForThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where's the rest of the video????

1
Theyreallinonit 1 point ago +1 / -0

wtf

1
Theyreallinonit 1 point ago +1 / -0

wtf

1
Foxbat 1 point ago +1 / -0

The correct word would have been immunize or protect, or treat, or affect. But he went with sterilize.

1
Trumper926 1 point ago +1 / -0

What the fuck

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1