5906
RUDY GIULIANI HAS 5000 SWORN AFFIDAVITS!!! (twitter.com) ⚠️ HIGH ENERGY⚠️
posted ago by Mindshift ago by Mindshift +5906 / -0
Comments (179)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
387
uzi5v2 387 points ago +388 / -1

And Russiagate was gaslit with ONE witness who was lying.

174
UnderCoverTrumper 174 points ago +174 / -0

They like didn't even sign an affidavit right? I think they never even went under oath. LOL.

130
lordvon 130 points ago +131 / -1

So zero affidavits

69
Brooklyn_Patriot_76 69 points ago +69 / -0

admissibility of sworn affidavits has been un-re-deboonkadoodled. learn more about the integritization of our elections here.

33
behemoth887 33 points ago +33 / -0

i saw libs shilling about how they could just make up a lie and sign an affidavit, and they were met with a response of "ok go sign the affidavit and see what happens"

for some reason they didn't go through with it.

28
PowerWordKek 28 points ago +28 / -0

But but but... I've seen no evidence in a court of law.

So haha. 39,0936,362372 cases deboooonked!

COPE

8
RedditIs4Retards 8 points ago +9 / -1

Zero affidavits

Zero oaths

27
Donald_Gear_Solid 27 points ago +27 / -0

Their cousin's brothers friends dogs uncle totally saw Drrrumpff pee on a bed with hookers.

18
Brooklyn_Patriot_76 18 points ago +18 / -0

Orange Man and the 7 dwarves confirmed. needs to be imparched with triumphlanazure!

5
side_o_beef 5 points ago +5 / -0

Confused Hunter for Donald. How convenient

7
Donald_Gear_Solid 7 points ago +7 / -0

Hunter is some scooby do bad guy lol. Every time they take off Trumps mask it's Hunter. "I would have gotten away with it too if it were not for this damn meddling crack pipe!"

22
BetsyFreedom85 22 points ago +22 / -0

When they did go under oath for questioning, not a single one of the 65 “witnesses” that were questioned said there was evidence of Russian collusion. They didn’t want to perjure themselves. Watch The Plot Against the President. So good.

9
UnderCoverTrumper 9 points ago +9 / -0

Thanks for clarifying!

8
BetsyFreedom85 8 points ago +8 / -0

👍😊 That’s my understanding from what I’ve read/seen, but you’re definitely correct to say no one under oath testified to any collusion. It was literally a massive gaslight media/dem propelled narrative for 3 years.

5
Vests123 5 points ago +5 / -0

They only lied to the American people in front of the cameras and not under oath.

8
bill_in_texas 8 points ago +8 / -0

The basement bunker hearings that Schiff held WERE under oath, which is why when we finally got the transcripts, all the people who went on TV to shout about muh kuhloozion, said privately and under oath that no, no they never saw any collusion.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
33
deleted 33 points ago +34 / -1
12
Fenianlad 12 points ago +12 / -0

I saw it happen at a rock concert. I could totally read his lips what he was saying.

5
side_o_beef 5 points ago +5 / -0

rock concert while someone was shooting out of the mandalay

2
remember1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

HAL3000 can confirm

2
Fenianlad 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m sorry, I can’t allow you to vote that way Dave.

4
fjobb 4 points ago +4 / -0

Was it even a speaker phone? I thought they were saying he could just hear the other side (so extremely muffled at best)?

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
16
LogicalPatriot 16 points ago +16 / -0

Aaaaand that witness was a 4th hand informant who HAPPENED TO BE CONNECTED TO RUSSIA HIMSELF.

The irony.

Who would of guessed that the claims of Russian collusion were actually true? Just about the accuser and not of Trump.

2
DiscoverAFire 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean, I would have guessed. That's SOP for dems.

7
bigdickhangsright 7 points ago +7 / -0

They knew the story was horseshit but him saying it anonymously divorced them from liability.

6
ItsOKtoVoteTrump 6 points ago +6 / -0

"sometimes secondhand hearsay is better than direct knowledge"