7621
Comments (622)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
30
Ninjatude 30 points ago +31 / -1

I read the article as well.

Their claim basically hinges upon the assertion that these were previously, legally opened ballots.

That assertion would be a lot more believable if they would show us the video of how the containers ended up underneath the table.

My thinking is that the table had a connected platform underneath with the containers on it, so that when it was brought onto the floor, the, boxes were brought in as well. It's a "magic trick", which explains why nobody saw the ballots being placed underneath the table.

At this point, the burden of evidence to show video evidence of when the containers were placed is on the "debunkers", as it's clear that this video should exist if their claims are true.

33
SanFranShitty 33 points ago +33 / -0

Previous legally opened ballots that were taken out of a hidden location late into the night after all the observers left. Okay sure 🙄

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
11
Skogin 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yes, from the first viewing of the surveillance video, I’ve assumed that there is a lower shelf under the table and the cases came in with it. She’s not a small woman, and she is really tugging that table to move it a short distance. If it was empty, one could half pick-up the table and drag it.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
10
FireannDireach 10 points ago +10 / -0

Their claim falls apart on the standards of chain of custody. That's what's going to fuck them right in the ass, all the way to SCOTUS.

They never expected scrutiny to get this far (because they're fuck ups) and they never thought to think a million dollar arena would have internal security cameras (they're really fuck ups).

And, they never expected Rudy. None of them.

6
NYC_4_Trump 6 points ago +6 / -0

They never expected scrutiny to reach this far because they never committed fraud this large. The fraud was so big they paused counting to have extra time to commit the fraud.

9
FireannDireach 9 points ago +9 / -0

Maybe, for GA. But when people like Dr. Tarver talks about this kind of thing being normal in "urban" districts going back years, you have to wonder - how real have any of our elections for the past 40, 50, 60 years been? Is this really new, or bigger than ever? How do we even know?

And that is the part that could spark off a literal shooting civil war. Imagine the public's reaction if it's suddenly dumped on them that their votes never counted? At every level, not just Presidential elections?

How could any country not implode with that being revealed?

8
IHeartMyDoggy 8 points ago +8 / -0

The video is constantly on the table from the time it was wheeled in to the time they pulled the ballots out, right? So if they never see on tape someone putting the ballots under the table, then they had to come in stored with the table

11
Bogey 11 points ago +11 / -0

Did they wheel the table in? If so... then that's interesting. Almost all tables at these event are collapsible. That way they cna easily stored. If they wheeled in a table in with table cloth and everything, that's something out of a heist film.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
bighomiebeenchillin 1 point ago +2 / -1

they pushed that shit right up in there lmao bitch was strugglin to get that table set

2
Tiocfaidh_ar_la 2 points ago +2 / -0

As absurd as it seems that they went full magic trick mode with a secret compartment, if the cases were never put under the table, then that is the only viable possibility. The cameras were on ALL day.

4
Bogey 4 points ago +4 / -0

Realistically they were brought in as normal stuff. When you're working, you tend to ignore all the boxes moving around and focus on the boxes you need to worry about. Most people would ignore boxes brought in and placed under a table as just extra material or some such.

That's why you need observers kicked out. Nobody to ask "hey, where did that come from". Mainly because 'under that table' isn't a good enough answer.