He's saying that this particular video may have an innocent explanation that will come up, later. He's also saying why a non-observed, high stakes election using vulnerable machinery in the US would be loaded with fraud.
So, Adams says this one piece of evidence is not essential. What IS essential is to know that bullies forced witnesses away. We have lots of evidence of forced secrecy.
OP is either a shill or not careful enough with its posting.
exactly- it goes even further - focusing on evidence that can turn out to not be true is risky because it undermines the totality of the claim. It's throwing a hail mary while you are already ahead. He is saying that we already have enough irrefutable concrete evidence of people kicking out observers by force and that should be enough. He is basically saying we should be focusing on what can be provable and make the point that this alone is enough to invalidate the election. He is saying there was motive (cheeto hitler!!!) and there was opportunity (kicked out observers) - and where motive and opportunity exists you get fraud.
There is no reason for a bunch of suitcases full of ballots to be hidden away in some location and then for counting to take place without observers present of those hidden ballots. I don't accept that there is a rational reason for this.
his point is that these people are morons, so would it be out of the norm for morons to not know how many ballot boxes there are in a disorganized operation, then start counting once you find them? He is saying that is plausible. His point is that it doesn't matter if it was fraud or not because there are already massive confirmed reports of observers being kicked out by force. And a non transparent election is a fraudulent election based on that fact alone.
Also Adams:
Doesn't believe in innate evil...
Doesn't think Soros is a bad guy...
Has lots of Hollywood friends (pedos) to keep close...
Has no fucking spine and dares not take any unpopular opinion.
i don't really see anything wrong with his analysis - he is saying that it definitely warrants following up and is suspicious enough for investigation. He then is saying that what we are seeing is consistent with multiple scenarios, some of which is fraud some of which is not fraud.
No, I don't agree. When you compare the vote dumps, and compare to the GA video, it's the only vote dump that is OVERWHELMINGLY Biden. 225k to 99k - 1:30am.
he is explaining two scenarios, one in which this shows fraud and one in which it doesn't and says that both are plausible - he then says that either way there is enough to see that it warrants investigation. He then says that he is 100% certain that there was massive fraud based on broader facts that need no confirmation because it is confirmed true. His point is that these types of too good to be true videos are unnecessary because we already know that the the observers were kicked out - and that is all that matters. The observers were kicked out. That is all that matters. That is enough.
Ok I can understand that point, but Scott is being Naïve in saying no video is needed, the greater court of public opinion and the media at large, requires things like a video and a vote dump correlation to unlock gates to get greater exposure.
To add to it, this woman was caught palming a thumb drive looking suspicious earlier in the day.
did you watch the whole thing - he is saying that if it is debunked that it harms the fight because it undermines the totality of the claim of broad fraud. And he is saying that it is not needed because what can be proven is already strong enough to discredit the election.
No, I stopped watching... How do you debunk a video, that is verified with 4 witness affidavits, 4 different angles, produced by the company who is in charge of security for the location???
He's already wrong, because the Governor, who was against everything, is now calling for a signature audit, because of the video...
so you didn't listen to his argument but decided it was worth commenting on? He is not saying the video could be fake (as in altered) he is saying that there could be a plausible explanation for what we are seeing on the video that is not fraud. Again, his point is that the argument against certifying the election is being overly confused with a never ending search for fraud, when we already have enough evidence in the fact that observers were kicked out by force to make the case. He is basically saying that we are giving people strawmen that they can defeat while ignoring the most compelling argument that no one can defeat because it is a universal truth - observers were kicked out on a massive scale.
I listened to his initial argument, I did watch some of the video, I did not continue to watch it.
My goal is to get a Signature Audit... not to prosecute these individuals. The Video provides probably cause ( which is all you need ) in order to call for an audit. Scott appears to want to hold this video up as evidence to be submitted in court. I don't care at that level.
Fuck that clown. I never watch his bullshit videos
OP's post is dishonest. Go ahead and watch.
He's saying that this particular video may have an innocent explanation that will come up, later. He's also saying why a non-observed, high stakes election using vulnerable machinery in the US would be loaded with fraud.
So, Adams says this one piece of evidence is not essential. What IS essential is to know that bullies forced witnesses away. We have lots of evidence of forced secrecy.
OP is either a shill or not careful enough with its posting.
exactly- it goes even further - focusing on evidence that can turn out to not be true is risky because it undermines the totality of the claim. It's throwing a hail mary while you are already ahead. He is saying that we already have enough irrefutable concrete evidence of people kicking out observers by force and that should be enough. He is basically saying we should be focusing on what can be provable and make the point that this alone is enough to invalidate the election. He is saying there was motive (cheeto hitler!!!) and there was opportunity (kicked out observers) - and where motive and opportunity exists you get fraud.
There is no reason for a bunch of suitcases full of ballots to be hidden away in some location and then for counting to take place without observers present of those hidden ballots. I don't accept that there is a rational reason for this.
his point is that these people are morons, so would it be out of the norm for morons to not know how many ballot boxes there are in a disorganized operation, then start counting once you find them? He is saying that is plausible. His point is that it doesn't matter if it was fraud or not because there are already massive confirmed reports of observers being kicked out by force. And a non transparent election is a fraudulent election based on that fact alone.
I think he enjoys being a troll more than anything.
Also Adams: Doesn't believe in innate evil... Doesn't think Soros is a bad guy... Has lots of Hollywood friends (pedos) to keep close... Has no fucking spine and dares not take any unpopular opinion.
edit: lol. A down vote. Hey Scott!
Is he retarded now? At best they counted illegally, and it was clearly intentional.
i don't really see anything wrong with his analysis - he is saying that it definitely warrants following up and is suspicious enough for investigation. He then is saying that what we are seeing is consistent with multiple scenarios, some of which is fraud some of which is not fraud.
No, I don't agree. When you compare the vote dumps, and compare to the GA video, it's the only vote dump that is OVERWHELMINGLY Biden. 225k to 99k - 1:30am.
he is explaining two scenarios, one in which this shows fraud and one in which it doesn't and says that both are plausible - he then says that either way there is enough to see that it warrants investigation. He then says that he is 100% certain that there was massive fraud based on broader facts that need no confirmation because it is confirmed true. His point is that these types of too good to be true videos are unnecessary because we already know that the the observers were kicked out - and that is all that matters. The observers were kicked out. That is all that matters. That is enough.
That is his point.
Ok I can understand that point, but Scott is being Naïve in saying no video is needed, the greater court of public opinion and the media at large, requires things like a video and a vote dump correlation to unlock gates to get greater exposure.
To add to it, this woman was caught palming a thumb drive looking suspicious earlier in the day.
did you watch the whole thing - he is saying that if it is debunked that it harms the fight because it undermines the totality of the claim of broad fraud. And he is saying that it is not needed because what can be proven is already strong enough to discredit the election.
No, I stopped watching... How do you debunk a video, that is verified with 4 witness affidavits, 4 different angles, produced by the company who is in charge of security for the location???
He's already wrong, because the Governor, who was against everything, is now calling for a signature audit, because of the video...
so you didn't listen to his argument but decided it was worth commenting on? He is not saying the video could be fake (as in altered) he is saying that there could be a plausible explanation for what we are seeing on the video that is not fraud. Again, his point is that the argument against certifying the election is being overly confused with a never ending search for fraud, when we already have enough evidence in the fact that observers were kicked out by force to make the case. He is basically saying that we are giving people strawmen that they can defeat while ignoring the most compelling argument that no one can defeat because it is a universal truth - observers were kicked out on a massive scale.
I listened to his initial argument, I did watch some of the video, I did not continue to watch it.
My goal is to get a Signature Audit... not to prosecute these individuals. The Video provides probably cause ( which is all you need ) in order to call for an audit. Scott appears to want to hold this video up as evidence to be submitted in court. I don't care at that level.
Oh you poor delusional man. Why was everyone told to go home? Counting was over for the day. Explain please?
Scott’s a fucking moron. “Credibility of the Georgia video is as credible as the Covington kids video”.
Literal ass-faggot.