Duh. The entire government (probably most governments around the world) are nakedly engaged in this coup. They do not care if you catch them. They will would record themselves slapping you in the face then deny it when shown the footage.
Incontrovertible evidence means nothing to these people.
I am not convinced that those people thought they were committing a crime.
I am not convinced the ballots under the table were 'hidden intentionally'..... I have no information as to when they were put under the table.
I do not understand why everyone was ushered out at 10:30.... but these people remained behind and thought they could handle ballots without observers. This is the hot issue.
Need more information as to the votes INSIDE those official suitcase containers.
I think this is a good point to re-iterate what the constitutional lawyer was talking about yesterday in the GA hearing.
Proving fraud is entirely not required. Proving the proper procedure was not followed is enough to invalidate an election, or call into question the ballots handled without proper chain of custody.
Put in other words stolen from Scott adams. If I leave my bank vault open every night, doors open, and no alarm on. Do I REALLY need to count the money in the vault to know some or all is missing? When a proper chain of custody is broken the reasoning flips, I don't have to prove fraud has been committed because you can't prove the process has been followed.
Suppose there was some honest mistake and half valid explanation for ushering everyone out and pulling ballots from under the table ( although lets be honest that looks veeeeeery suspicious ). Merely counting without proper observers there breaks the proper process. as pointed out in the hearing, small breaks in proper process affecting a lot less ballots than those counting machines chugged through have invalidated elections before.
As to a lot of people on the ground? Yeah I'd bet most of them just thought this was normal and were doing as instructed.
Duh. The entire government (probably most governments around the world) are nakedly engaged in this coup. They do not care if you catch them. They will would record themselves slapping you in the face then deny it when shown the footage.
Incontrovertible evidence means nothing to these people.
It's going to take violence.
I can't believe they're so brazen about committing these crimes in essentially broad daylight in a country that basically invented freedom via guns.
I am not convinced that those people thought they were committing a crime.
I am not convinced the ballots under the table were 'hidden intentionally'..... I have no information as to when they were put under the table.
I do not understand why everyone was ushered out at 10:30.... but these people remained behind and thought they could handle ballots without observers. This is the hot issue.
Need more information as to the votes INSIDE those official suitcase containers.
I think this is a good point to re-iterate what the constitutional lawyer was talking about yesterday in the GA hearing.
Proving fraud is entirely not required. Proving the proper procedure was not followed is enough to invalidate an election, or call into question the ballots handled without proper chain of custody.
Put in other words stolen from Scott adams. If I leave my bank vault open every night, doors open, and no alarm on. Do I REALLY need to count the money in the vault to know some or all is missing? When a proper chain of custody is broken the reasoning flips, I don't have to prove fraud has been committed because you can't prove the process has been followed.
Suppose there was some honest mistake and half valid explanation for ushering everyone out and pulling ballots from under the table ( although lets be honest that looks veeeeeery suspicious ). Merely counting without proper observers there breaks the proper process. as pointed out in the hearing, small breaks in proper process affecting a lot less ballots than those counting machines chugged through have invalidated elections before.
As to a lot of people on the ground? Yeah I'd bet most of them just thought this was normal and were doing as instructed.