Comments (19)
sorted by:
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
BuckMelanoma 5 points ago +5 / -0

He’s convinced this is a Covington moment for the Right. To hell with that. Covington happened when a single still image went viral, not a video clearly showing what is happening.

4
lasTRUMPcard 4 points ago +4 / -0

He lives in California. He can't help but say bOtH SiDeS

3
Tom94 3 points ago +4 / -1

Him like cerno are fucking traitors in the same boat.

3
mugatucrazypills 3 points ago +3 / -0

He thinks he's cleverly pacing us for a Biden win and that Trumpism will win in some sort of moral high ground via 6D chess(cope). His larping is fatiguing.

He betrayed Trump repeatedly when it mattered like a total Judas. He's a weak coward that helped the CCP win.

3
augustinius 3 points ago +3 / -0

Let's all remember one thing: Scott Adams is on our side.

He's a proponent of his own world-view, which is admittedly bizarre and the product of someone who means well but has no belief in God.

Tons of things are happening. Not everyone can stay on top of everything. Let's show him the light and keep him around, as he's a better ally and conduit toward Truth than many other influencers. Tim Pool ain't got shit on Scott Adams.

5
slag 5 points ago +5 / -0

Scott Adams is on our side

I think he's on Scott Adams's side. Like Tim Pool. He often has coherent logical takes and can provide a fresh perspective. The ability to think outside the box is useful and has provided some crazy predictions. He also flip flops and minces words after the fact to hedge, and even changes odds in real time. Just another data point.

2
augustinius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah that's a better analysis, but he's still a generally helpful presence. It's good to have influencers like him as an example of how to come back to the truth after flip-flopping.

Most humans are inconsistent, after all...

3
slag 3 points ago +3 / -0

If Scott is a master persuader, why would you trust him? :) Reminded me of a class I took from a former spook who had 0 qualms about lying since, by virtue of its necessity, lying was moral. Why would you believe someone like that?

Take Scott with a grain of salt, but verify against other sources to get your own sight picture.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Llmallary 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only basis for this to be fake news would be if the video was manipulated or if the actions depicted in it were misinterpreted. Nobody has suggested the video wasn’t legit, so the innocent explanation for toting ballots around in suitcases is what?!?!?

2
lasTRUMPcard 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly. There have been no plausible denials so how can the assumption be it's fake? Fuck it, the moon landing was fake.

2
manmadegod 2 points ago +2 / -0

Super important guy- for a...uh? Cartoon?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0

If they have cutters that are responsible for doing the validation (which requires the envelope)., separating ballots from envelopes, and then those votes are counted at a different time without observers, the system is fucking retarded. His whole premise is predicated on the fact there are cutters who only separate the ballots from the envelopes. If that is not the case, he has no argument. If it is, he does.

2
Anon6992374 2 points ago +2 / -0

Doesn't surprise me that the guy that believes we live in a computer simulation is able to jump through a bunch of intellectual hurdles to remain "fair and balanced."

There's so much other video that directly contradicts his assumption about "envelope cutters" showing the people opening the ballots or "cutting them" were the same that stayed behind.

DEBOONKED

2
handpeople 2 points ago +2 / -0
  1. Saying observers were envelope cutters, I understand they were observers and signed affidavits to the fact. Are they cutters, or observers? If there are people who separate ballots (cutters) from envelopes, and they count them later, how is the signature validation done? Do you verify and then count later? Not sure what the legality of that is. It would not make sense to not have observers when the ballots are counted. Easy enough to verify.
  2. Ok, containers are not suitcases, never thought they were, obviously. Could be official containers. So what.
  3. The poll workers have not to my understanding been under penalty of perjury, cannot deboonk without that. Ball is in their court.
  4. Is ballot harvesting legal in GA as he says they might have counted only the harvested ballots. I dont know.

So yes, what he is saying is not surprising, we need follow up. They might be able to explain this. But... This is not happening in isolation, this is part of a large amount circumstantial suspicious evidence. Shut downs happening in multiple states coordinated. An axe does not prove murder, an axe, a body, and a motivation is.

1
TrumpsWall 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow. What was that?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0