Comments (4)
sorted by:
1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is how it would look if things got serious with or without Sterling. When it comes down to crunch time, there will be serious doubt and hardcore questioning into our evidence, thats the way it always works. Our evidence would need to stand up to all scrutiny. Here is my problem, we may not get that chance. Our side says this, their side says that, however, they are not under oath, they have not been questioned under penalty of perjury. They admit their is fraud, but say its not enough without letting us look. Thats the problem. Our case has to stand up, but apparently, they dont even need to make a REAL case.

1
jgssjs12 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree completely.....smh…….WE GOT THIS!!!!

right?

1
handpeople 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe.

-1
jgssjs12 [S] -1 points ago +1 / -2

Damn man.....before this report I thought that this video was the turning of the tide!!! But fucking Gabriel offers a reasoning for everything in that video that makes just enough sense that the people we need to SEE the fraud will doubt it enough now to stand by and do nothing....