I dont know, they are claiming there are people who separate the ballot from the envelope, and put them in some sort of container, for them to be counted later. I believe mail in vote validation requires an envelope in order to validate. If this is a two step process, validate, then put aside for counting later (when observers are not required), its FUCKING RETARDED. Does it violate GA state law that the legislators specified, I dont know. So 1. Are they indeed cutters. 2. Is it legal to count votes outside the sight of observers.
I need to go back and watch the video again. Was up until 2:30 am finishing the hearing video and I’m tired. I know they pulled the black table in front of the scanner but don’t know how/where they were working. I know this is fraud—it’s the clown world we live in that requires us to go to Herculean lengths to prove this.
Yeah, but it shouldn't. The fact that the laws were ignored, chain of custody tainted, etc. to such an extent that it could make a difference... that is enough on its own to invalidate the election.
If a website's security certificate is invalid, should you enter your banking info and just trust that they are who they say they are? No. Same concept applies here.
Also they specifically made it almost impossible to have direct proof of anything, for example they kicked out republicans and didn't allow cameras (oops they still got caught because that's how widespread this was). Not to mention that if people come forward their lives get ruined (the opposite of what happens if you come forward to help the left).
On an assembly line you have people who do a specific function a million times. What they are alleging is that that entire room full of people that were sent home's only function was to open the envelopes and seperate them from the ballots to be counted by these 4 people after the ballot cutters purpose was complete.
Yeah but aren’t signatures supposed to be verified by a Republican and Democrat at the opening process? That’s where the signature verification check is supposed to count, as Elena Parent ridiculously argued last night. So if this is their claim, they are removing the signature verification at ALL points which is illegal even against their new stupid rule they made up earlier.
gasp NO. it can't be...They're just ballot cutter/checking guys. DEBOONKED. just cope dRumpftard, there's no such thing as voter fraud, human beings are incorruptible and we have the best elections in the world REEEEEEEE
Let's be real, they could come up with some deboonk excuse for almost anything. You could have a video of Ruby throwing away a stack of Trump ballots and they'd have some "akshually" fact check that the media would parrot with authority.
I saw the video this morning where fulton county certified the results and the head of the election board literally SAID they were in there counting ballots but it was "normal procedure"
The whole Deboooonking is predicated on these people not being ballot counters, but "cutters". Rudy needs to be able to scrutinize that claim.
What the heck are ballot cutters now?
I dont know, they are claiming there are people who separate the ballot from the envelope, and put them in some sort of container, for them to be counted later. I believe mail in vote validation requires an envelope in order to validate. If this is a two step process, validate, then put aside for counting later (when observers are not required), its FUCKING RETARDED. Does it violate GA state law that the legislators specified, I dont know. So 1. Are they indeed cutters. 2. Is it legal to count votes outside the sight of observers.
I need to go back and watch the video again. Was up until 2:30 am finishing the hearing video and I’m tired. I know they pulled the black table in front of the scanner but don’t know how/where they were working. I know this is fraud—it’s the clown world we live in that requires us to go to Herculean lengths to prove this.
Yeah, but it shouldn't. The fact that the laws were ignored, chain of custody tainted, etc. to such an extent that it could make a difference... that is enough on its own to invalidate the election.
If a website's security certificate is invalid, should you enter your banking info and just trust that they are who they say they are? No. Same concept applies here.
Also they specifically made it almost impossible to have direct proof of anything, for example they kicked out republicans and didn't allow cameras (oops they still got caught because that's how widespread this was). Not to mention that if people come forward their lives get ruined (the opposite of what happens if you come forward to help the left).
2 is definitely illegal. Georgia requires vote counting to be open to the public.
Which is why the alleged "fact checker" claims that no one was asked to leave, but the observers left on their own. The facts say otherwise though.
Even if they alluded they would not be needed (lied) it would still be kicking them out from a legal perspective, using reasonable person theory.
I don't fucking care what they are.
WHY DID THEY LIE AND SEND THE OBSERVERS HOME AND THEN CONTINUE WORKING ONLY AFTER THEY WERE NO LONGER BEING WATCHED?
Give me a legitimate answer to that question and then and only then will I entertain your explanations of why these activities might be legitimate.
Until then, all you're doing is covering your ass.
On an assembly line you have people who do a specific function a million times. What they are alleging is that that entire room full of people that were sent home's only function was to open the envelopes and seperate them from the ballots to be counted by these 4 people after the ballot cutters purpose was complete.
Yeah but aren’t signatures supposed to be verified by a Republican and Democrat at the opening process? That’s where the signature verification check is supposed to count, as Elena Parent ridiculously argued last night. So if this is their claim, they are removing the signature verification at ALL points which is illegal even against their new stupid rule they made up earlier.
Yes and both sides were not there. Either way the law was broken.
How very government: use 25 people to the do the job of 5.
Cutting up ballots they don't like, knowing the dems
This deboonk itself can be debooooonked because they can be seen running them through the tabulators. "Cutters" now that is real cope.
none of their deboonking will hold up in court assuming an honest judge.
I mean... numbers were generated at that time. Someone was counting during that period.
Now I know I'm probably out on a limb here, but I'm going to wager a guess it's the people we have on camera running votes through tabulators.
gasp NO. it can't be...They're just ballot cutter/checking guys. DEBOONKED. just cope dRumpftard, there's no such thing as voter fraud, human beings are incorruptible and we have the best elections in the world REEEEEEEE
honk-honk
Let's be real, they could come up with some deboonk excuse for almost anything. You could have a video of Ruby throwing away a stack of Trump ballots and they'd have some "akshually" fact check that the media would parrot with authority.
No doubt. But Kavanaughs yearbook was proof of a satanic gang rape cult.
I saw the video this morning where fulton county certified the results and the head of the election board literally SAID they were in there counting ballots but it was "normal procedure"
It does say "ballot counters" in the tweet though!
Yeah, so what are they? I would like to know.