6706
Comments (237)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
27
neehl 27 points ago +27 / -0

I need to go back and watch the video again. Was up until 2:30 am finishing the hearing video and I’m tired. I know they pulled the black table in front of the scanner but don’t know how/where they were working. I know this is fraud—it’s the clown world we live in that requires us to go to Herculean lengths to prove this.

10
day221 10 points ago +10 / -0

Herculean lengths to prove this

Yeah, but it shouldn't. The fact that the laws were ignored, chain of custody tainted, etc. to such an extent that it could make a difference... that is enough on its own to invalidate the election.

If a website's security certificate is invalid, should you enter your banking info and just trust that they are who they say they are? No. Same concept applies here.

Also they specifically made it almost impossible to have direct proof of anything, for example they kicked out republicans and didn't allow cameras (oops they still got caught because that's how widespread this was). Not to mention that if people come forward their lives get ruined (the opposite of what happens if you come forward to help the left).

5
neehl 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes. That’s what makes me so angry. The whole election is fraudulent to begin with, over and over and over and over we have testimonies, witnesses, HARD EVIDENCE of fraud and people are freaking acting like Forky from Toy Story when presented with the evidence and that “debunks” our claims. I’ve never been more angry in my life.

5
JimmyJam 5 points ago +5 / -0

THIS. We should not even need to prove fraud. All that needs to be proven is that the laws required to prevent fraud from taking place were not followed. If the laws the legislature puts in place to ensure a fair and transparent election are not followed, how can anyone be reasonably assured of a fair election? You can't. All the actually evidence of fraud is just icing on the cake as far as I am concerned.

It is clear there were deliberate actions in urban polling locations to lock out adversarial oversight. It is unacceptable and should lead to those locations having their votes, at an absolute minimum, subject to an intense audit.