13
posted ago by JSullz59 ago by JSullz59 +13 / -0

By now it's a joke whenever YouTube or Twitter through on "This claim about election fraud has been dispooooted" but is there any legal avenue to go after these disclaimers?

This is from the Twitter Election Disputed page.

"Officials and experts warned ahead of Election Day that most interference in US elections, whether from foreign or domestic players, comes in the form of misinformation campaigns, many of which are intended to create distrust in the US’s electoral process."

MUTHAFUCKA IT'S YOU. You're the one sowing this distrust and misinformation.

Comments (3)
sorted by:
1
TheBigKahuna 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes

1
Cbllbc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Candace Owen's won some suit related to Facebook. That might be a good starting point.

1
jackneefus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Social media has enjoyed special exemptions from legal action on the basis that they are neutral platforms. Going after them consists of removing that exemption on the grounds that they have not been neutral.