Scott Adams does an awesome job of giving a plausible alternative explanation to what we saw and that version is what the left will use very soon. The video is still a very powerful tool of persuasion though and it gives us an opportunity to investigate further. Were the ballots counted correctly, did they originate from real voters? All kinds of real information could be gathered based on this.
Scott gives legitimate counter-arguments that lawyers will use. He says it's suspicious, but it's not full-proof. It comes down to a few points:
The "witnesses were sent home" could have been a miscommunication over ballot cutters (removing the ballots from envelopes) being done, while counters were not.
The actions in the video aren't completely out of the ordinary. In particular, the people in the video may just be scanning ballots as normal; they didn't know who put ballots there - they just saw stacks of ballots and ran them.
It's possible that the ballots could have even been placed there legitimately, but the ballots themselves were fraudulent from harvesting, etc.
At minimum, the batch of ballots that they scanned should be further analyzed.
Well get mad about it then, but I don't see how that helps you. It's a good idea to see what the left might be thinking or arguing. We can poke holes in this argument, or use the video to investigate further, or you can just insult the person who's telling you something you don't want to hear.
Scott Adams does an awesome job of giving a plausible alternative explanation to what we saw and that version is what the left will use very soon. The video is still a very powerful tool of persuasion though and it gives us an opportunity to investigate further. Were the ballots counted correctly, did they originate from real voters? All kinds of real information could be gathered based on this.
TLDW:
Scott gives legitimate counter-arguments that lawyers will use. He says it's suspicious, but it's not full-proof. It comes down to a few points:
At minimum, the batch of ballots that they scanned should be further analyzed.
Well get mad about it then, but I don't see how that helps you. It's a good idea to see what the left might be thinking or arguing. We can poke holes in this argument, or use the video to investigate further, or you can just insult the person who's telling you something you don't want to hear.
Yes, because he has only one skill and that's it. He has nothing to add to society beyond that because he draws cartoons.
We're still waiting for Season 03 of Dilbert.
He gets in to it pretty quick. 4:14 and I think he talks about it for 10 minutes or so.
Asshole!