163 posted 134 days ago by LibertarianGuy 134 days ago by LibertarianGuy +163 / -0 6 comments share 6 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (6) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 6 ▼ – PedeofMD 6 points 134 days ago +6 / -0 Good point. I said the same thing. permalink save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – Zadok 3 points 134 days ago +3 / -0 It isn't much of a deterrent, but some people are afraid of spending the rest of their lives in jail. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – DangleBarry 2 points 134 days ago +2 / -0 In both Senate races, the "official" count was that nobody got a majority of votes (50%+1). When that happens, by law, there is a runoff between the top two candidates. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – TheJake 2 points 134 days ago +2 / -0 THIS NEEDS TO BE THE WARCRY IN THE STREETS permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – becky21k 1 point 134 days ago +1 / -0 I have said this several times too. You don't hold a runoff if you don't need to. permalink save report block reply ▲ -1 ▼ – NvCrone -1 points 134 days ago +1 / -2 The obvious question, or more precisely, the elephant in the room. permalink save report block reply
Good point. I said the same thing.
It isn't much of a deterrent, but some people are afraid of spending the rest of their lives in jail.
In both Senate races, the "official" count was that nobody got a majority of votes (50%+1).
When that happens, by law, there is a runoff between the top two candidates.
THIS NEEDS TO BE THE WARCRY IN THE STREETS
I have said this several times too. You don't hold a runoff if you don't need to.
The obvious question, or more precisely, the elephant in the room.