2827
Comments (57)
sorted by:
77
superchump555 77 points ago +77 / -0

Hehe.. Scorched earth policy coming. All RINOS and traitors be doooomed

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
18
Tread_not_on_me 18 points ago +18 / -0

Fuck the welfare rats infesting our government. Can’t get fired. Always get paid. Lazy and fucked in the head. A friend of mine worked for them for a summer and he told me 4 or 5 guys came in and did fuck all

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Tread_not_on_me 3 points ago +3 / -0

No that’s just the ones who didn’t do ANYTHING. The others were run of the mill public sector lazys. They might have done something, but it wasn’t expedient. F em all. There’s probably 1 out of 100 who are working hard and they should have been speaking up about it

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
Tread_not_on_me 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, I’m not trying to persecute you ‘pede. I only wish the best for my fellow patriots. The only way we can fix it is by cutting all restrictions on firing and run the government like a business. It’s a swamp all the way down to your local city fucking dmv.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
conservativeyuppie 0 points ago +2 / -2

Lol, clearly you don't understand shit about how the federal government works. Let me educate you. I'm a federal employee and I've gone directly to my boss out of frustration to ask if we could fire certain people and her answer was a flat no. There's someone on a team of mine that does literally NO work and gets combative if you even ask her to do something. 3 of us have REPEATEDLY made complaints to management about this and fucking nothing. Someone did get in trouble though. Wanna know who? We did. Because the incompetence on the team at some point got too much that we were too blunt and direct in calling it out to their faces. Yup, not doing your work isn't a problem, but GOD FORBID you use the "wrong tone" because you'll get into trouble for that. I still won't quit my bitching to them but it does literally nothing. We even caught that same chick on a hot mic during a virtual meeting talking mad shit about her boss and I told her boss about it and that still wasn't enough for any disciplinary action at all. She's a union steward too (surprise surprise) so there's literally nothing you can do to get her fired. And because salaries are based on seniority and how many years you've worked in gov, she gets paid more than I do. Good fucking luck to me if there's a government shutdown.

My boss is the average DC lib who hates Trump but even she is totally a fan of his plan to make it easier to fire federal employees. It's literally the only thing she's openly given him credit for because even the kool-aid drinking normie libs in government are fucking sick and tired of this bullshit. And by the way, standards in government are so low that I can finish my work, cover for other people's work, and still have time to fuck around for hours a day, which is probably the only reason I'm able to spend so much damn time on this site as I do.

1
Tread_not_on_me 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is either a copypasta or you didn’t read my comments. By speaking up I don’t mean to the fatter rats up the sewer rungs, I mean to ordinary people who pay taxes and people who make policy. People who can actually do something. We’re on the same side lol

3
superchump555 3 points ago +3 / -0

New Stimulus bill is bogus. i am expecting Trump Will SHUT Government Down as Ordinary Citizens are not getting money and are facing tyranny. and Most of these FEDERAL are BLM/ACLU and vote democratic

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Futuramawe 1 point ago +1 / -0

When people who run small businesses can get paid, then the non politicians get paid. Not a moment before. The people come first.

32
InarosPrime 32 points ago +32 / -0

The problem with shutting down the government is that it includes the courts. There are still many cases yet to be decided. A couple of them have a chance of flipping the entire election upside-down.

The electoral college meeting does not prevent their votes from being disqualified by the courts. The real deadline you should be considering is January 10th, which is when Congress accepts the votes. After that, it is harder to change who is inaugurated on the 20th.

34
deleted 34 points ago +35 / -1
14
themedallion [S] 14 points ago +14 / -0

The scenario I'm posing is rather a short shutdown. In my example, let's say that we go into shutdown enough to stymie ourselves into a constitutional crisis whereas the Supreme Court must rule whether the election stands. This would bolster our case because we would have evidence of foreign, federal, state, and local interference with respect to the election. This would make the problem "widespread". The election process would not follow the constitution because key dates are outlines explicitly. Failure to follow those rules could be grounds for our defense.

6
InarosPrime 6 points ago +7 / -1

The other side has to accept the result. A court decision is hard for them to argue against. Using shenanigans to down the process and somehow invalidate it won't end well.

1
Raos044 1 point ago +1 / -0

The other side openly cheated massively. I am all for not setting bad precedents but at this point, I don't give a fuck if they accept it or not.

1
InarosPrime 1 point ago +1 / -0

The more "legitimately" Trump wins, the less likely the situation turns into a civil war. Avoiding a civil war is in everyone's best interest.

7
ProphetOfKek 7 points ago +7 / -0

Pretty sure shutdown is only nonessentials. SCOTUS is essential.

3
A_whole_nother_thing 3 points ago +3 / -0

"harder to change" LOL that's an understatement

3
VetforTrump2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fuck them judges. They are half the problem.

17
iamherefortheluls 17 points ago +17 / -0

he can't. Presidential veto can be over-ridden with 2/3 vote of House and Senate.

If GOP betrayed him, he can't stop this by veto.

10
juicemoney9 10 points ago +10 / -0

Not that we dont have an idea already, that vote would really tally who in Congress is a Patriot and who is a globalist commie faggot

2
TickleMissle 2 points ago +2 / -0

So basically two....or MAYBE three patriots

16
whiskey_shitz 16 points ago +16 / -0

Why not? The government is practically shut down over a damn cold anyway.

16
Mintap 16 points ago +16 / -0

No legitimate vote = no government funding

12
tremendous_trump2020 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yes!

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
12
deleted 12 points ago +13 / -1
6
AmannamedRJ 6 points ago +6 / -0

Careful. Trump blinked last shutdown and demoralized a LOT of people

6
hodlmybeer 6 points ago +6 / -0

Only 16% would be shut down. Everything else is deemed essential.

6
Aclothorsomething 6 points ago +6 / -0

Maybe this is the perfect time to use the September 2018 Emergency EO

5
Batch77 5 points ago +5 / -0

shut it down and all gov workers will not get a paid vacation. No money if it shuts down. Let the asss holes that stab us in the back feel the f pain. Shut it down.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
Viewer01 4 points ago +5 / -1

Defunds the fed. Paralyses the machine. Calls up the unregulated militia.

4
webthing 4 points ago +4 / -0

I trust Trump will do the right thing.

3
six5_SMK 3 points ago +3 / -0

If business owners can go without opening, Federal Employees can go without pay.

1
conservativeyuppie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair enough, but why the fuck is the response to that to just shut everything down? Let the damn businesses open back up like they always should have been, we federal employees had nothing to do with that idiotic decision.

3
you_can_do_it 3 points ago +3 / -0

Quick question - does this pause funding for the 3 letter agencies as well?

1
VetforTrump2 1 point ago +1 / -0

It should

1
E-dantes 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope

1
Airos_Brightblade 1 point ago +1 / -0

It depends on what is determined essential. Some will be furloughed while others will still get funding they need to perform their duties (think CBP/ICE)

2
Patriot20800 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also to figure out the non-essential govt workers we don’t need anyway.

I think thousands need to get a job in the private sector.

2
VetforTrump2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just get us to martial law and let us go get these politicians and these dirty ass pole riggers. Start with the governor, ojnties cities and even the police chief and sheriffs if they don't defend the constitution. These brownshirt naZis all need to be eliminated

2
BeardedNinjaPede 2 points ago +3 / -1

FedGov employee here. I'll "endure" another shutdown if it gets rid of Section 230. I was happy to shutdown last time to get a border wall.

The government doesn't really do much in December anyways with everyone taking leave.

2
Censorddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what I've been saying!!

2
Indianapede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Like I give a shit if they shut down.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
obviouslytom 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem with a "government shutdown" is that only 12% really does shut down. The rest stays running perfectly fine.

1
MsAnthropic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shut it down anyway. The whole system is corrupt.

1
Vir4030 1 point ago +1 / -0

The meeting of the electoral college is not funded by the federal government.

1
bubbletea 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shit it down to protect workers from covid

0
Morokei 0 points ago +1 / -1

Shut it Down!!

We have no government anyway. No DOJ. No fbi.

Just need the loyal military.

-16
IslamIsEvil -16 points ago +4 / -20

well no, that's really just disruptive and counterproductive

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0