2727
Comments (68)
sorted by:
98
Illuminaughtie 98 points ago +98 / -0

they are gaslighting on an unprecedented scale

42
darkhorsereddit3 42 points ago +42 / -0

It’s really is. We are past the point of having to prove the evidence. We have numbers, you don’t like numbers? Pictures, don’t like those? Viddya. Not your thing? Eye witness testimonies...

We are at the point to where the deboonkers are going to have to start providing some proof there wasn’t voter fraud.

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
12
LongKahn 12 points ago +12 / -0

I fucking LOVE this. LETS MAKE THEM PROVE AN ACTUAL FUCKING ELECTION HAPPENED

15
TruthWillOut 15 points ago +15 / -0

Justin Gray is not a "reporter", Justin Gray is a "repeater", just like everybody else in the corrupt MSM.

9
RussianAgent13 9 points ago +9 / -0 (edited)

the deboonkers are going to have to start providing some proof there wasn’t voter fraud

If we had a legitimate election system that would be the job of the state and county election boards. They would be held to financial accountability standards, with each ballot being treated like a $100k instrument. Signing off on an election where fraud occurred - even if you weren't aware of the fraud - would be grounds for fines and potentially prison time.

7
undefined 7 points ago +7 / -0

They discovered that they, with nearly zero effort, can get the testicles of powerful people into their hands under the threat of bad coverage.

It's what power hungry effeminate men or women do when they get power hungry.

4
Greatest_adventure 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fallen to Chinese influencers.

49
sun_wolf 49 points ago +49 / -0

In a free market, yes, reporters love scoops. In a monopoly, where all the TV news networks and all the newspapers and all the magazines are owned by the same six corporations, no, then reporters do not pursue scoops because if the scoop is off-limits, then pursuing it will get them blacklisted.

21
Psalm5v10 21 points ago +21 / -0

Reporters may love scoops, but they love their jobs more. They certainly know what scoops would get them fired.

15
Gesirisi 15 points ago +15 / -0

They love their jobs, and they love being alive, more than scoops.

7
censorthisss 7 points ago +7 / -0

Obamagate was the biggest political scandal in a very long time (only recently topped by the 2020 election fraud) and they didn't go near that story.

Trying to convince us that they'd go after election fraud that was perpetrated by Democrats is laughable.

22
T__X 22 points ago +22 / -0

Reporters love being able to sleep at night and leave the house in the morning knowing that their home and family won't be threatened or harmed by a job of leftist terrorists.

"When they fear you, they don't fuck with you."

Reporters fear the left, they don't fear the right.

8
Gesirisi 8 points ago +8 / -0

They fear the deepstate, the cabal. CIA, CCP, Soros and his ilk... God knows what else is involved. Underwater super intelligent ocean people, whoever the fuck is actually running this psychotic box of fireworks known as America

3
LaPastillaEscarlata 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why would they fear that shit, they are just as much a part of the swamp as the deep state and the establishment etc. They are all comrades. They love Soros. They are yes xirs. These corporate media giants don't hire real reporters/journalists.

2
censorthisss 2 points ago +2 / -0

At least half of them are deep state, CIA, Soros lackeys, etc. Another 25% are married to politicians or lobbyists and the other 25% are probably the people you describe.

1
acasper 1 point ago +2 / -1

I think a ”job” of leftists is the last thing we should be using to refer to a group. Maybe a “splatter” or a “shrill”

16
Patriot3976 16 points ago +16 / -0

They ran russian collusion instead of quid pro Joe, hunter laptop, fisagate, or Clinton foundation pay 2 play. They don't love scoops, except if it's Trump's 2 scoops then it's a story how he is power hungry.

3
censorthisss 3 points ago +3 / -0

Remember that huffpo headline that was like, "Trump may have said something at some point in an elevator somewhere."

I'm not even exaggerating. It was that insane lol

3
Patriot3976 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah how many bullshit stories came out with "anonymous white house staff" and other bull crap.

12
Despitetospite 12 points ago +12 / -0

They wouldn't insult Fox news (until they started agreeing) and Parlor if it was just about ratings

11
PEPEpeepee 11 points ago +11 / -0

Record every name of every person gaslighting and running interference. This goes to war they need to die.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
10
EtTuRINO 10 points ago +10 / -0

Wasn't it CBS that had a scoop on Jeffrey Epstein?? What happened? Oh, that's right, it went away.

Didn't Anderson Cooper say many years ago that he was working on a story about a high quantity of child porn in upper levels of the Pentagon?? What happened? Oh, that's right, it went away.

And guys, 17 different intelligence agencies told us Russia made a difference in the 2016 election and we totally believe that but for 2020 the election was flawless. Also those 17 agencies also agreed that Iraq had WMDs.

9
sportsbettingtruth 9 points ago +9 / -0

I work in the industry and that's exactly what it is

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
6
RARA2 6 points ago +6 / -0

Everyone who hadn’t seen James O’Keefe leaked CNN audio go see it!

5
RussianAgent13 5 points ago +5 / -0 (edited)

That's amazing. An activist reporter who is either outright lying or has his head buried in the sand.

How much did he talk about Bobulinski?

Or here's a juicy story for you:

A member of military intelligence was working with a team monitoring election data, and has claimed in sworn testimony that Dominion executives and DHS officials flat out lied when they said their machines don't connect to the Internet. Dominion machines are all over Georgia and supposedly got a contract after proving how secure they were - while in reality they are sending our votes all around the world.

Or they aren't, and the fact that the Colonel made such a shocking claim is the story. Either way that kind of stuff would get lots of eyeballs and HUGE interest from the public if you aired it on TV. That is a MASSIVE STORY and a scandal no matter what side of the election fraud argument you're on. Any serious reporter would be crazy not to cover it - unless what he said isn't true about journalism today.

Not to mention how reporters shouldn't be on either side of the election fraud argument in the first place. How would he know if the claims of fraud are true or not if he hasn't investigated them?

Considering how stupid somebody would be to rationalize all this away, I'm going to have to assume he's a liar.

2
ex67v 2 points ago +2 / -0

excellent post. underrated.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
Greatest_adventure 2 points ago +2 / -0

We can thank FB for the deterioration of REAL communications. Follow me? Unfollow me? Binary crap that has no place in true discourse.

4
We_Are_138 4 points ago +4 / -0

2 SCOOPS 2 TERMS

4
CleanYourRoom 4 points ago +4 / -0

in a world where you will be blacklisted defamed and assaulted maybe a scoop isnt a priority

3
dumdumexpress 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, O'Keefe will make him a scoop and then he'll get what that word means.

3
behemoth887 3 points ago +3 / -0

reporters sure but none of you are reporters. you're all just democratic party spokesmen.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
oshead 3 points ago +3 / -0

Problem is they are not reporters. Since the "Inter web" became the thing, everyone is a reporter. So they cannot compete with everyone being a reporter. Like the post says, these "Activists" want Access, Adoration and Adjacent to Power. Basically "Influencer's". That's the new norm.

3
verycute 3 points ago +4 / -1

First you have to distinguish between reporters and propagandists. Then it is easier to recognize characteristics.

3
NZbacon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Big difference between a reporter and a journalist.

Very few journalists exist these days.

2
RussianAgent13 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the classic reporter is the true journalist that no longer exists.

Journalism today is equivalent with activism.

2
Nearlydearly2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I love this post. Useful conversational ammo.

2
socal_maga 2 points ago +2 / -0

The didn't love Trumps 2 scoops...

1
motrhed3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Justin Gray's tweet will not age well.

1
RoosterHeadBad 1 point ago +1 / -0

Independent unbiased reporters are doing this. But they are being deplatformed and silenced while you cheer and attempt to mock them. Remember?

1
trockr 1 point ago +1 / -0

Simpler explanation- they hate America and will do anything in their power to see it destroyed.

1
Bigdeal 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol who would believe this after hearing the CNN daily briefing giving them the dnc’s matching orders. So called reporters are just worker bees for the democrats

1
ex67v 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh they'd be scooping alright if it were somehow conservatives were the ones caught committing fraud.

Their bias is so incredibly transparent. And they somehow think they can make a statement like this and we'll just quit. Clowns.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
theflabmaster 1 point ago +1 / -0

You get kicked out of the club when you piss off the establishment. If the scoop gets you kicked out, then it will be ignored

1
VoteCyborgTrump2040 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol, they love scoops? Where's all the coverage of Hunter Biden's laptop then? Fucking clowns. They should be the first against the wall.

1
ztrich007 1 point ago +1 / -0

Real reporters are willing to throw away their entire careers for every ounce of truth.

1
rentfREEEE_since2016 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol. somebody spam the Veritas video on his twitter feed.

1
RememberNichelle 1 point ago +1 / -0

None of these people are reporters. They don't care one bit about facts, or finding out what factually happened.

They are "journalists." Not very good journalists, but that's what gets taught at today's "journalism schools." They are propagandists, not reporters at all.

1
47urOFH3d 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't even have the lung capacity to respond with the proper suuuuuuuuuuuure...

1
Haven91 1 point ago +1 / -0

BINGO

1
JIVEprinting 1 point ago +1 / -0

got a date stamp on the tweet? cuz the kraken is wrecking his stuff as we speak

1
Big_Boss_Stones 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most "scoops" are things that people dont want to be public. They are either personal, embarrassing, or crimes. Reporting on these types of things puts you at odds with people, especially in the days of twitter and social media, everyone has their camps. Why risk making enemies when everyone can be your friend?

1
AenAllAin 1 point ago +1 / -0

he mispoke, I think he meant poops and gaslights.

1
TheTudes 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just want to say to @JustinGrayWSB — “what are you? two little monkeys - see no evil and hear no evil that murdered speak no evil”

1
Fabius 1 point ago +1 / -0

“The press is a gang of cruel faggots. Journalism is not a profession or a trade. It is a cheap catch-all for fuckoffs and misfits—a false doorway to the backside of life, a filthy piss-ridden little hole nailed off by the building inspector, but just deep enough for a wino to curl up from the sidewalk and masturbate like a chimp in a zoo-cage.”

1
ShampocalypseWOW 1 point ago +1 / -0

Corrupt Media That No One Trusts: "Don't you think if there was really evidence of fraud committed by our allies in politics who we rely on for our existence, we'd have covered it by now because that'd be like, a good story (whatever THAT means)??? Checkmate, DRUMPF!"

1
goingbigly 1 point ago +1 / -0

Linda Tripp would disagree. So would Tara Read.

1
rootGoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

Today I learned:

Reporters are...

  • lonely
  • suck ups

I already knew they were liars.

1
bigmikesballsack 1 point ago +1 / -0

What a cuck. Anything he hasn’t looked at “doesn’t exist.”

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0 (edited)
1
Loiuzein 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's so shitty. I grew up on reporters eager to score scoops, who would work their way into access and burn their pass for a great reveal.

1
IvIA6A 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because reporters aren't interested in journalism, they prefer opining over twitter and making declarations that fraud doesn't exist without reviewing any evidence, without trying to identify any of these individuals for comment, or elections officials for what was in those boxes, what was told to the Republicans and reporters that were vacated.

No, reporters are fucking lazy. "What Ice cream did you get?" Give me a fucking break.

1
Ejax 1 point ago +1 / -0

They like scoops so much they tried desperately to scoop yellow snow in russia. Journos are only interested in digging dirt on conservatives. Always been that way.