16
Comments (5)
sorted by:
3
handpeople 3 points ago +3 / -0

Its a bargaining chip, ask them to remove it and they are exposed. If they remove it, then they can put something else in place, under a lot of pressure, or, they can get serious about fixing it bigly and Trump would probably sign.

1
superchump555 1 point ago +1 / -0

country is going through major crisis. article 230 to be vetoed and dealt with separately. Its Freedom vs Tyranny now. The same people who are rooting for 230 if Biden wins will cry for Repeal

1
nuhbin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Styx is right about the consequences... without 239nthen Facebook can pretend that they have to delete all your content because it's illegal in California to day bad things about [insert democrat demographic here]

he might be wrong/might be right about being able to leave it in place and defeat the censorship with a law that supercedes 230

there is also the legal argument that the entire 230 immunity clause is predicated on "action in good faith" (or something to that effect) by the corporations, so a good lawsuit and judgement might just change the way 230 is interpretated by the courts going forward

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
1
keepwinning 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agree