I think the strategy seems to be to claim incompetence, bad procedures, not understanding the law,..... These are all easy things for legislatures to overlook, historians to rewrite, and many people to grudgingly accept.
What they need to avoid is clear evidence of coordinated fraud - that pisses people off, triggers investigation, and facts are stubborn things.
That is the whole dem strategy and that is why the late night counting party video is so powerful.
There are hundreds of pieces of evidence and one by one they may be disputable. The problem is that half the public has no experience so they have to be convinced that these things are unusual and compelling, while the other half (probably only 1/3) agrees with the result so don't care.
Taken together, all that evidence is damning.
They also use the excuses like Trump incites people to vote against him, or the dems had a better ground game, or even the bias in Big tech and Big media. Those things are legal and they claim would explain the crazy fraud numbers in some cities.
The worst POS epla-justi-nation was Tucker saying people just wanted "things to go back to normal". Yeah, right. ESAD tucker.
But they do this to get the momentum behind the idea that they may have stole it, but they stole it "fair and square" by creating an incompetent system and lying to the public for four years. Not so. Even against all that Trump got more votes.
Against the law! Everything has to be saved for 2 years or more! Prison time coming if they are doing it!
Maybe the penalties for deleting the data are less severe than the penalties for getting caught for the fraud. That's my theory.
I think the strategy seems to be to claim incompetence, bad procedures, not understanding the law,..... These are all easy things for legislatures to overlook, historians to rewrite, and many people to grudgingly accept.
What they need to avoid is clear evidence of coordinated fraud - that pisses people off, triggers investigation, and facts are stubborn things.
That is the whole dem strategy and that is why the late night counting party video is so powerful.
There are hundreds of pieces of evidence and one by one they may be disputable. The problem is that half the public has no experience so they have to be convinced that these things are unusual and compelling, while the other half (probably only 1/3) agrees with the result so don't care.
Taken together, all that evidence is damning.
They also use the excuses like Trump incites people to vote against him, or the dems had a better ground game, or even the bias in Big tech and Big media. Those things are legal and they claim would explain the crazy fraud numbers in some cities.
The worst POS epla-justi-nation was Tucker saying people just wanted "things to go back to normal". Yeah, right. ESAD tucker.
But they do this to get the momentum behind the idea that they may have stole it, but they stole it "fair and square" by creating an incompetent system and lying to the public for four years. Not so. Even against all that Trump got more votes.