25
posted ago by ColoRobo ago by ColoRobo +25 / -0

I tried to post a screen shot of the email but I can’t seem to post pictures to this site sometimes for some reason. Enjoy the wall of text.

My initial email to him:

I would like to know what steps you are taking to support our President, the Republican Party and the integrity of our elections which no logical, rational person can deny were tampered with on a large scale during the 2020 presidential election. I follow this issue very closely and can not recall your name being mentioned in any public statements. I understand I can’t possibly see every statement and story in the current political news cycle but I would like to believe my elected representatives are acting in accordance with their stated goals and expected duties. I sincerely hope that you and the Republican Party as a whole understand, our support is for President Donald Trump. Any Republican representatives not publicly and vocally supporting the president, the integrity of our elections and not calling out the massive amounts of obvious election fraud and the media’s collective blackout of coverage on the topic will be remembered during the next election cycle. Remember, more than 70% of the people that just voted for President Trump are ready to leave the Republican Party if a new, truly Conservative party were started by the President. More than 90% of those same voters and more than 30% of democrat voters believe the election is being illegally stolen by Joe Biden. Now is not the time for weak leadership. This is a defining moment in our countries history. I expect my elected representatives to loudly and proudly stand for the very basic principles that make this the greatest country this planet has ever seen. Thank you for your time.

His response:

“ Thank you for contacting me about the results of the 2020 election. I appreciate the opportunity to hear from you. This is an important time of robust discussion in our country as we certify the results of an election where more Americans participated than any other election in American history.

Because of the pandemic, this election cycle saw an unprecedented number of mail-in ballots and early voting. As a result, the election results have been announced very slowly in several states. Oklahoma requires that absentee ballots must be received by the close of the polls on Election Day, which allows our state to complete our count within hours of the election close. Clearly, several states do not have election systems as efficient or transparent as the Oklahoma process. This is an issue we should address for every future federal election.

During the long delay, multiple stories of fraud, questions about legal ballots and double counting have arisen. Free and fair elections rely on our ability to ensure that every legal vote is counted. It is essential that evidence of voter fraud or irregularities be brought forward. In 2000, Al Gore challenged the election results in Florida for over a month, taking his case to the Supreme Court two times. In 2018, Stacey Abrams challenged the election results for Governor in Georgia for ten days, then filed a lawsuit to change the way elections are conducted in Georgia. Our judicial system is the appropriate place to ensure the integrity of our elections. President Trump has every right to question irregularities and ask for recounts where the law permits. I support his pursuit and believe the Americans who voted in this election should have their questions answered and know that the President who will serve the next four years was duly elected.

Election results announced the night of the election by the media are always considered unofficial. Usually there is a clear winner and both candidates agree on the final outcome, but multiple times in American history elections have been very close and it has taken weeks to determine the final winner. The United States Constitution provides a detailed timeline for the days and weeks following a presidential election. The Electoral College is scheduled to vote, by law, on December 14th 2020.

Between November 4, 2020,and December 14, 2020, states are responsible for counting and certifying their vote count. Several states have already completed their certification. Federal law requires the governors of each state to prepare documents known as Certificates of Ascertainment. These certificates list the names of the electors chosen by the voters and the number of votes received. These certificates must be delivered to the Archivist of the United States and the electors before December 14th, 2020. The electors will cast their votes on December 14th and provide the Certificates of Ascertainment and the Certificates of the Vote to the President of the Senate (the Vice President of the United States). A joint session of Congress is set to meet on January 6th, 2021, and will count the votes and declare the results. The election results are not final until this process occurs.

Several Oklahomans heard through social media or some news sites that I prematurely called Joe Biden, “President elect” or I have not supported President Trump’s legal challenges; both of those accusations are false. I simply stated have stated that Joe Biden should continue to receive intelligence briefings while the results are being certified.

Many people may not know that prior to Election Day, both candidates for President receive daily intelligence briefings months before the November election to help them prepare for the task. This has been a longstanding practice for national security to help both candidates be ready for the many complicated international and domestic challenges that we face each day. Obviously, President Trump already receives all the intelligence information that he requests each day. Late this summer, Joe Biden also started receiving these intelligence briefings each day, but on Election Day those briefings stopped.

As a country, we found ourselves in a similar situation in 2000 during the Bush v. Gore election. The outcome of the presidential election was undetermined for over a month. While the matter worked its way through the courts, George Bush was cut off for three weeks from the intelligence briefings. But, by late November, George Bush was allowed to start receiving intelligence briefings again, just as he did during the campaign. For several weeks after that, both candidates received the briefings until the election was finally determined. This is a reasonable model for the present situation.

Simply stated, we should follow that precedent and allow both candidates to receive the same pre-election intelligence briefings while the process of confirming election results works its way through the process. On November 23, the Administrator of the General Services Administration (GSA), Emily Murphy, made the necessary resources and services available to Biden and his team in the event of a presidential transition. As a result, Biden has begun to receive the appropriate intelligence briefings. This does not change, impede, or question President Trump's ability to ensure every legal vote is counted.

National security is not a partisan political issue - it is essential for every American. Two decades ago, the 9/11 Commission Report emphasized the importance of continuity for national security purposes even in a disputed election. Continuing the intelligence briefings does not acknowledge a winner in the race, it only assures that we are keeping our priority focus on national security.

I hope this information is helpful. Please feel free to contact me again to learn more about my work in the United States Senate for all of us.

In God We Trust,

James Lankford United States Senator”

What do y’all think? Is it enough?

It seems like sort of an answer accompanied by a ton of political noise. If these guys truly support the President, how do we force them to be more vocal about it?

Comments (25)
sorted by:
6
Sherlocks_Pocket 6 points ago +6 / -0

It’s hard to complain. Seems sensible. Still he’s a loser. Totally not MAGA. Thanks Oklahomie

2
ColoRobo [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

No problem Pocket Pede.

5
Classicalliberal 5 points ago +5 / -0

Primary him is my response.

2
ColoRobo [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed.

5
Mrsattorney 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes. I don't see any of these Republicans getting out there and standing up for Trump. Mitch McConnell just might be the worst one when it comes to hiding. I am disgusted by their behavior.

2
ColoRobo [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s truly amazing how many words they can use to really say nothing. It’s probably the most thorough non-answer I’ve ever received.

4
francis_key 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't understand why the Senator made this point:

"Late this summer, Joe Biden also started receiving these intelligence briefings each day, but on Election Day those briefings stopped. ... Simply stated, we should follow that precedent and allow both candidates to receive the same pre-election intelligence briefings while the process of confirming election results works its way through the process."

That was never brought up.

2
ColoRobo [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I found that super odd also. I never asked about that. Soft justification of Biden. I’m not on board.

4
CoupCoupKaChew 4 points ago +4 / -0

He seems remarkably fixed on the idea that fucking Joe BIDEN of all people deserves to be informed about National Security while the whole fucking election has been a shadow government action to take out the winner - President Trump. Fuck him and his stance - I don't trust this fucking cuck.

3
ColoRobo [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree. I didn’t even ask about any of that.

3
Barack-Obama2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Bullshitty response. Respond and be less nice.

3
Trumpdeasses 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just tell him you would like to see him backing the president by being front row and center at the rally tomorrow night. That should smoke him out.

2
thesas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ask him if he is concerned that according to hunter bidens laptop received mone for influence? Will he consider Biden legitimate? We all need to understand that they almost all.are swamp and were appointed not elected

1
ColoRobo [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good call. I will include it in my response.

2
MagaChief 2 points ago +2 / -0

Reply to him with one sentence:

Do you think Joe Biden should receive security briefings on China, Ukraine and Russia given his and his sons prior conflicts of interest where money has been funneled potentially in violation of federal criminal law?

2
WhoWasThatMaskedMan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your assessment is correct. It's good-government boilerplate, so he answered by not really answering.

1
ColoRobo [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

It really was a very thorough non-answer.

2
Classicalliberal 2 points ago +2 / -0

We also need to ask him about his position on the great reset

1
ColoRobo [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m sure I would receive 5 paragraphs about why it’s okay Biden got a dog or some shit.

2
Classicalliberal 2 points ago +2 / -0

The contingency plan is to get red state pedes to band together and put real pressure on their states to reject federal authority.

1
djtverystablegenius 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am deeply disappointed in Lankford.

Citing 9/11 as the penalty for a transition Lankford does not approve of is inappropriate. Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and Iran have been operationally crippled. Because of Project Veritas we know this idea comes from CNN's Mark Zucker.

Do you use Dominion voting machines in Oklahoma by any chance?

2
ColoRobo [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t believe so. I think we are so red they don’t even try. Both Oklahoma Biden voters are total cunts.

2
djtverystablegenius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oklahoma is based. Great people.

2
ColoRobo [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you. They really are for the most part as long as you stay out of Tulsa and OKC. They’re turning into typical liberal shitholes.

1
djtverystablegenius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oklahoma appears to use optical scanners instead of Dominion.