Win uses cookies necessary for site functionality, as well as for personalization. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.
In many ways all the odds are against us. The swamp has grown for decades and has permeated federal, state, local governments, the media, pop culture, education, and partnered with criminal elements nationwide.
This is a huge moment in our country's history. If we lose then the victors will inscribe in the history books that the last four years were just an unfortunate anomaly to be left in the graveyard along with the rest of our "overrated" freedoms.
I know the feeling! I was always so eager to get north of Wesley Chapel because that's when traffic started to thin out and the scenery got even nicer.
I seem to remember looking at the results coming in on election night and noting that Trump was doing unusually well in Delaware. To the point that I actually looked manu times to see the updates there.
Why don’t poll-watchin’ pedes just register as Democrats so they can actually see what’s happening and keep things in check? Undercover MAGA. I mean, it’s a simple idea and there might be reasons this wouldn’t work—just throwing it out there.
Yes I have been wondering this for a month. It's shocking to me that not one seemed to do that.
Any for that matter, why did none sneak in cameras. I doubt they physically checked people coming into the center, although I guess it's possible they put them through metal detectors.
We all have jobs man. But it was a wake up call for a ton of us. When I voted in ‘16 the black guy scanning the ballots had an Obama hat on (deep blue area). That should have been my wake up call not to trust these dishonest people.
You’d be right. The observers are usually people involved with local party politics. You can’t just say “I’m a commie, errr, Democrat” and expect to be let in. It would have to be a deep, long term undercover stake out.
Surely the fraud is not explicit to most of the party members. It is not like the DNC sends out a newsletter with fraud instructions. Given counting machines, you probably only need like 12-20 conspirators per state for "high level" fraud like the video shows in Georgia State Farm Arena?
Going undercover will probably expose "low intensity fraud" though, like unfair calls on borderline valid votes etc, or more explicit fraud, like counting mail-in ballots without return address.
If 230 straight up goes away, they will be held liable and can be sued for what their users put on their platform. Thus they are going to lock it down tighter than a Chinese concentration camp, and ethically cleanse anyone for the smallest of things.
Right, but here’s the issue, 230 already does not apply to publishers.
The key isn’t kill 230, it’s to verifiably establish Twitter/Facebook/YouTube are not platforms.
230 should exist for actually neutral platforms, The financial burden in lockdown should be placed on Twitter Facebook blah blah blah because people move away from them.
The court says otherwise. When the trump account banned people, the court ruled they couldn’t due to it being a digital town square, so to speak. Am I wrong about that ruling?
I’m a computer scientist and technology/law historian.
A company does not have those rights when they tap in to the national communications infrastructure.
Such logic would mean Private Telephone Companies can refuse subscribers, drop subscribers, censor phone calls. That’s what was happening in the first decades of the telephone. Laws put a stop to that.
Even earlier, Ben Franklin put a stop to that very same thing in the transmission of content to remote printing presses and the distribution delivery of newspapers. His massive “internet” and censorship protection was such a huge pillar in our new form of government that he was recognized as one of the founding fathers.
We could — no, should — apply the laws of private telephone exchanges to social media collaboration providers. If our phone companies had added Facebook like services to our phones, before the wireless internet, we would have had all the protections already legally built in.
This was decided long ago regarding private telephone companies....
....and even longer ago by Ben Franklin.
Folks have not been taught why Franklin was one of our founding fathers.
Franklin’s network was the equivalent of FaceBook, Twitter, Reddit of today.
His contribution to our Country was creating uncensored postal routes — a huge accomplishment — as all communications including newspapers and news to local printing presses went by post.
Use of the internet infrastructure (which are de facto the 21st century postal routes) does NOT give the courier the right to open your letter and add their own commentary.
And then people seek free alternatives that don't ban every single thing, and a new law can be written that protects smaller companies but not large monopolies.
The problem is section 230 worked great until a couple years ago, when some court re-interpreted it.
Eliminate 230 and every small outfit, including TD.win will get bankrupted in lawsuits. Then the small outfits will become controlled/owned by unfriendly forces.
Unfortunately he threw the case out "with prejudice" which means it can't go up the ladder. Apparently it cannot go to supreme court now (is what I am hearing)? Could be fake news but I am no lawyer.
"With prejudice" doesn't mean you can't go up it just means you can't file at the base level again. If "with prejudice" meant what you're saying nothing could be elevated.
Do these judges actually say why they are dismissing the suits? Do they look at the 12 binders of affidavits and mathematical analysis and say there's no evidence, or are they dismissing them for some weird technicalities like late filing or no standing or something?
Want to remain optimistic but if Trump appointed judges aren't being persuaded then I worry about SCOTUS.
Watched the video. In total the Trump team is alleging ~64,000 disqualifiable ballots. The current gap in votes is 34,000, so if they are successful in invalidating these ballots they would necessarily need to be almost entirely Biden ballots to close the gap. Trump would need to have no more than 23.4% of the ballots that are disqualified which is a tall order. I hope they are but I'm not aware of any demographics in Nevada that swung so heavily in Biden's favor. Would appreciate hearing from anyone that's looked more thoroughly at those votes.
Where's the perjury charges judge? If they all just lied to you in your court then you have to charge each witness and let them have discovery in a criminal trial. Oh, you don't want discovery but will call them criminal none the less.
There are only two options available to Trump: the SCOTUS option or the 'Lincoln' option.
All the legal/media drama you see now is just to prepare the masses, perhaps wake up a few more neutral folks and some Dems who still have their conscience intact.
Which of the two will Trump pick? It's a coin toss, we'll find out.
They seem to happen 10-15 minutes after the twee, and it doesn't happen on EVERY tweet so yes, they appear to have a team of people actually checking them.
Sounds like there are some investigations that should be done. Why would these not be done. It's fucking outrageous to not investigate claims of fraud. Who needs to be hung before this is taken serious. We are talking thousands of votes in multiple states. Do your fucking job government, I despise government and will never work in it.
Okay...so SCOTUS time? When? 12/8 is the deadline really for any challenges. That is the "safe harbor" date that leads to 12/14 being a rubberstamp if SCOTUS don't do a damn thing.
We already won. Let's go celebrate with the president.
Stay loud and stay pissed.
Failing is not an option. If we fail we'll never get another chance to stop these traitorous commies from stealing the country.
Now or never gentlemen.
In many ways all the odds are against us. The swamp has grown for decades and has permeated federal, state, local governments, the media, pop culture, education, and partnered with criminal elements nationwide.
This is a huge moment in our country's history. If we lose then the victors will inscribe in the history books that the last four years were just an unfortunate anomaly to be left in the graveyard along with the rest of our "overrated" freedoms.
What? Arent we "going" if we lose?
Agreed. Failing to uphold justice is not a option.
Driving up from Tampa. Four hour drive for us!
I’ve got family in Tampa and Vidalia, GA. That’s a haul, you’re a real hero, hope you have a blast!
Thank you for going! I live in New Hampshire but my heart is there with you guys. God bless America 🇺🇸
I feel bad. I’m 10 minutes away from the airport right now.
Wish it was at the Rome Airport again. Would only be about an hours drive then.
You're a unsung hero for going that far. Keep up the high spirits we'll need it soon enough.
I know the feeling! I was always so eager to get north of Wesley Chapel because that's when traffic started to thin out and the scenery got even nicer.
^^^^
Idk. The MSM is pretty great at ignoring major stories
I’ll be there!!
DEBOOOOOONKED
DEPOOOOOONTED
DEFROOOOOOTED
DESLOOPTED
REBOOOOOONKED!
PREBOOOOONKED! https://thedonald.win/p/11QlB8lElo/bunk-theory-explains-relation-of/
BADONKADOOOONKED
I love this place
This place loves you
I love the female firebrand pedes muhself.
They keep saying Trump needs to "flip 3 states", but he's about to flip 6 of them.
Way more. This was a landslide.
Any suits filed in Delaware??
Word on the ground is good chance Trump won Delaware.
How fucking awesome would THAT be
I seem to remember looking at the results coming in on election night and noting that Trump was doing unusually well in Delaware. To the point that I actually looked manu times to see the updates there.
Why don’t poll-watchin’ pedes just register as Democrats so they can actually see what’s happening and keep things in check? Undercover MAGA. I mean, it’s a simple idea and there might be reasons this wouldn’t work—just throwing it out there.
Yes I have been wondering this for a month. It's shocking to me that not one seemed to do that.
Any for that matter, why did none sneak in cameras. I doubt they physically checked people coming into the center, although I guess it's possible they put them through metal detectors.
We all have jobs man. But it was a wake up call for a ton of us. When I voted in ‘16 the black guy scanning the ballots had an Obama hat on (deep blue area). That should have been my wake up call not to trust these dishonest people.
The Dems with government/school jobs have a pretty good lock on the Dem watcher positions. They make sure they know who everybody is in the room.
After we fix this. That’s what we need moving forward. Blue hair dye spies.
I’ll fucking do it.
They had to be vetted and verified Antifa and BLM. I'd bet money on it.
(Other than their old-time proven fraudsters like the mother-daughter team from hell)
You’d be right. The observers are usually people involved with local party politics. You can’t just say “I’m a commie, errr, Democrat” and expect to be let in. It would have to be a deep, long term undercover stake out.
Donations.
We need an operation “Jump Frog”
From now on, we make sure we have one pede run as dem in every position in every primary across the country.
OPERATION COVERT COMMIE!
Surely the fraud is not explicit to most of the party members. It is not like the DNC sends out a newsletter with fraud instructions. Given counting machines, you probably only need like 12-20 conspirators per state for "high level" fraud like the video shows in Georgia State Farm Arena?
Going undercover will probably expose "low intensity fraud" though, like unfair calls on borderline valid votes etc, or more explicit fraud, like counting mail-in ballots without return address.
They actually had closed door meetings to teach fraud. Multiple affidavits attesting to this.
DISPOoOOoOOoooOootEd
That disputed tag has become an absolute cringe fest. It's so 1984.
This dispooted tag is widely considered by election experts to be dispooted.
But has it been deeebbbooooonnnkkkkeeeddd?
Has become?
wow what a nice red angry color, i definitely belive this DIIIIISPOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOTATION
Line holding status:
Held.
Very That!!!!!
How the fuck can Twitter put DISPOOOTED claims on stuff that has actual evidence. They’re fabricating an entire alternate universe
Yup and until Section 230 is killed they can continue to do so, with impunity.
?
If 230 straight up goes away, they will be held liable and can be sued for what their users put on their platform. Thus they are going to lock it down tighter than a Chinese concentration camp, and ethically cleanse anyone for the smallest of things.
We need the recent court interpretation of 230 to be reversed.
The original 230 kept the companies from censoring.
Right, but here’s the issue, 230 already does not apply to publishers.
The key isn’t kill 230, it’s to verifiably establish Twitter/Facebook/YouTube are not platforms.
230 should exist for actually neutral platforms, The financial burden in lockdown should be placed on Twitter Facebook blah blah blah because people move away from them.
Yes, but that includes TDwin! All the platforms will be gobbled up by someone in bankruptcy.
Gotta love libertarians who don't understand the difference between what is essentially a digital town square and private sites like this one.
The court says otherwise. When the trump account banned people, the court ruled they couldn’t due to it being a digital town square, so to speak. Am I wrong about that ruling?
I’m a computer scientist and technology/law historian.
A company does not have those rights when they tap in to the national communications infrastructure.
Such logic would mean Private Telephone Companies can refuse subscribers, drop subscribers, censor phone calls. That’s what was happening in the first decades of the telephone. Laws put a stop to that.
Even earlier, Ben Franklin put a stop to that very same thing in the transmission of content to remote printing presses and the distribution delivery of newspapers. His massive “internet” and censorship protection was such a huge pillar in our new form of government that he was recognized as one of the founding fathers.
We could — no, should — apply the laws of private telephone exchanges to social media collaboration providers. If our phone companies had added Facebook like services to our phones, before the wireless internet, we would have had all the protections already legally built in.
Ahhh....NO!
This was decided long ago regarding private telephone companies....
....and even longer ago by Ben Franklin.
Folks have not been taught why Franklin was one of our founding fathers.
Franklin’s network was the equivalent of FaceBook, Twitter, Reddit of today.
His contribution to our Country was creating uncensored postal routes — a huge accomplishment — as all communications including newspapers and news to local printing presses went by post.
Use of the internet infrastructure (which are de facto the 21st century postal routes) does NOT give the courier the right to open your letter and add their own commentary.
And then people seek free alternatives that don't ban every single thing, and a new law can be written that protects smaller companies but not large monopolies.
The problem is section 230 worked great until a couple years ago, when some court re-interpreted it.
Eliminate 230 and every small outfit, including TD.win will get bankrupted in lawsuits. Then the small outfits will become controlled/owned by unfriendly forces.
GET TO THE RALLY FOLKS!
Fuck the NFL.
National FAGGOT League
Having refball on my side is bizarre as a Chiefs fan. Oh, free first down sick! But what the fuck did they even do?
Vote early. Vote often!
I’M GONNA DISPPOOOT
Weren't we supposed to hear an update on this case this morning at 10am?
I'm not finding anything on that ruling.
Judge Ruled agaist trump. Said that cheating is a constitutional right for democrats to win
Unfortunate. Up the ladder we go then.
Unfortunately he threw the case out "with prejudice" which means it can't go up the ladder. Apparently it cannot go to supreme court now (is what I am hearing)? Could be fake news but I am no lawyer.edit: I'm wrong, I was gaslit. Glad I am wrong!
"With prejudice" doesn't mean you can't go up it just means you can't file at the base level again. If "with prejudice" meant what you're saying nothing could be elevated.
Thank you for the clarification, twitter fags were gaslighting in the comments and I believed them. I edited my post so it's corrected.
No problem, there's a lot of disinformation out there
Yeah that’s not true at all. The PA case was dismissed with prejudice and, iirc, it’s sitting at the foot of SCOTUS now
Thanks for correcting me! I updated the post.
He got cold feet
Do these judges actually say why they are dismissing the suits? Do they look at the 12 binders of affidavits and mathematical analysis and say there's no evidence, or are they dismissing them for some weird technicalities like late filing or no standing or something?
Want to remain optimistic but if Trump appointed judges aren't being persuaded then I worry about SCOTUS.
Dispooooooted
I typically am too transfixed on Chanel or some of the other's beauty to notice.
Chanel plays up the stereotypical classic reporter style in the way she dresses, acts, and speaks.
I'm sorry I can't hear you the light of her beauty is too distracting.
One post in 16 minutes?
Did a watermain break and the site stopped counting?
ThIs ClAiM aBoUt ElEcTiOn FrAuD iS dIspUtEd
Limbaugh pissed me off today, too worried about optics. Drag your balls across their face GEOTUS
Limbaugh isn't concerned about optics, only observing that they are. He thinks we should have gone to war long ago.
Watched the video. In total the Trump team is alleging ~64,000 disqualifiable ballots. The current gap in votes is 34,000, so if they are successful in invalidating these ballots they would necessarily need to be almost entirely Biden ballots to close the gap. Trump would need to have no more than 23.4% of the ballots that are disqualified which is a tall order. I hope they are but I'm not aware of any demographics in Nevada that swung so heavily in Biden's favor. Would appreciate hearing from anyone that's looked more thoroughly at those votes.
Dead, underage, illegal, mentally ill, invalids, po box dwellers and the homeless voters do not vote for Trump
Why is this downvoted. Is it true or not?
It is true but I don’t have link, sorry. Heard it on War Room this eve
I think it was here too on Lou Dobs https://thedonald.win/p/11QlFkupQO/giuliani-latest-update/c/
Where's the perjury charges judge? If they all just lied to you in your court then you have to charge each witness and let them have discovery in a criminal trial. Oh, you don't want discovery but will call them criminal none the less.
Decision made next Friday? The 11th? or today?
I would take that to mean next Friday, the 11th, since this is from today.
The judge already cucked and tossed out the lawsuit.
Gotcha. Makes sense. Wasn't sure if it was possibly a video from a few days ago re-tweeted or something.
I'm sorry but this lawyer seemed like a dope... Maybe he's not but I tried watching it yesterday and he seemed lost. Correct me if I'm way off.
There are only two options available to Trump: the SCOTUS option or the 'Lincoln' option.
All the legal/media drama you see now is just to prepare the masses, perhaps wake up a few more neutral folks and some Dems who still have their conscience intact.
Which of the two will Trump pick? It's a coin toss, we'll find out.
He doesn't really get to "pick" the SCOTUS option. Either they pick it up, or they don't.
And if they don't, we turn on them like they turned on us.
Are they just marking any Trump tweet with that bullshit disclaimer, or do they have a special team of mutilated lunatics personally reviewing them?
They seem to happen 10-15 minutes after the twee, and it doesn't happen on EVERY tweet so yes, they appear to have a team of people actually checking them.
Section 230.
Sounds like there are some investigations that should be done. Why would these not be done. It's fucking outrageous to not investigate claims of fraud. Who needs to be hung before this is taken serious. We are talking thousands of votes in multiple states. Do your fucking job government, I despise government and will never work in it.
🇺🇸Trump 2020🇺🇸
Small place with limited parking. Going to be a disaster if you go so plan accordingly.
This will be a celebration rally of "FOR MORE YEARS"
Realistically, how confident are we that this will be turned in his favor?
It sure would be nice if OAN legitimized themselves more and got off weird KlowdTV, time to make your own streaming service.
He pinned it
3hr 27 min drive from here. I'll never make it in time. QQ
LETS GOOOOOOOOO!
"will make his decision Friday" does he mean before midnight?
15 hours away. Ugh. Please come to PA!!!!
Native Nevadan here
Shit was rigged
They illegally kept the polls open and that's how we got Cortez-Masto
Yep.
I never read the comments anymore.
Twitter still trying their hardest to protect their Globalist efforts.
Has the judge made a decision yet?
Okay...so SCOTUS time? When? 12/8 is the deadline really for any challenges. That is the "safe harbor" date that leads to 12/14 being a rubberstamp if SCOTUS don't do a damn thing.
SCOTUS has to take the cases first.
Supposedly the legal team was there today, although I can't find any solid evidence of it.
wait so what was the ruling today?
Today's ruling was NV. SCOTUS isn't making a ruling any time within our limited scope of vision.
I heard this as well but I haven’t heard anything else other then that. Hope we can land it.