There's a well known guy on this forum with that name who goes around saying exact same things that you said. Always gets heavily downvoted. So I made a joke and asked if you were him on an alt account.
Ahh, OK. Cool, my bad for not knowing everyone on the site? I do not bend the knee to the almighty Sid & Lin, that's all. Trump will win bigly because it is ordained by the true Almighty. That's what we all want, yes? It will be by the hand of the lords servant Giuliani however, not these faggots paper gods Lin & Sid.
I don't like that when the guy asks if she has evidence that voting info went overseas, she replies that she has statistics and analysis of vote flipping.
This isn't the first time she (unintentionally?) doesn't answer the direct question about evidence.
I hope she has stuff that's more compelling than what got tossed today in Nevada. This situation is maddening. It's perfectly okay for dead people to vote. WTF
I've seen it. Just like Nevada. And it was tossed. That's why I hope she has the evidence about data going to Germany or Spain or wherever. Those machines aren't even supposed to be online. So this could be important, and she didn't answer the question. I hope it wasn't intentional.
They know this as well. We are loyal to the constitution and ONLY the constitution. And God of course, but in terms of the laws of man, we have that great Godly governing document to live by. We honor and will die to protect it if need be. If SCOTUS honors the Constitution of the United States, we will defend them from foreign or domestic enemies to the last of us. We are not loyal to SCOTUS. We are not loyal to Trump. We are patriots. We are loyal to our country and its founding principles. It just so happens that Trump is also one of us and is loyal to the same.
So much fraud, cheating, lying, and stealing, and so few Congressional GOP representatives seem to be bothered. That’s because swamp likes it that way. It is up to us to save our country, the people, as it always has been. Everyone here should be ready for whatever steps become necessary.
Saying, "I have a bag of shredded ballots" means nothing. They could be (and likely are) test ballots.
See the witness from yesterday who talked about printing hundreds of ballots so that the machines can be tested. They're identical to real ballots and even have votes filled in. This is required by law and about the only thing they did that followed the law.
Actually, this means slightly less than saying, "I have a witness that will testify that Hugo Chavez rigged his election 20 years ago. Now overturn the 2020 U.S. election".
Still illegal:
42 USCS § 1974 provides that every officer of election shall retain and preserve, for a period of 22 months from the date of any general, special, or primary election of which candidates for the office of President, Vice President, presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, or Resident Commissioner from the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico are voted for, all records and papers which come into his or her possession relating to any application, registration, payment of poll tax, or other act requisite to voting in such election, except that, when required by law, such records and papers may be delivered to another officer of election and except that, if a state or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico designates a custodian to retain and preserve these records and papers at a specified place, then such records and papers may be deposited with such custodian, and the duty to retain and preserve any record or paper so deposited shall devolve upon such custodian. Any officer of election or custodian who willfully fails to comply with these requirements will be fined not more that $ 1,000 and/or imprisoned not more than one year.
Now tell me how testing materials not used in the election fit into to that.
Answer: They don't.
It's possible that Powell could be on to something but what she has, by itself, is nothing. She's on TV again promoting "evidence" that she cannot connected to anything.
"Your honor, here is a bag of test ballot that we shredded/ spoiled so that they could be fraudulently inserted into voting machines. We kept all the bags. Except for the bags that Sidney Powell stole."
All they said was that they were under contract and had been for years, pretty much. I can't blame them because they were essentially getting doxxed by our side after Wood started posting shit on Twitter.
We should ask question about stuff. There is a whole lot of very questionable things. What we should not do is jump to conclusion and start posting shit on Twitter that we can't substantiate.
There are very good reasons to have shredder trucks at places and very bad reasons. We don't know which is true. The correct thing is to attempt to find out before you go blast somebody's information all over Twitter and accuse them of illegal acts.
Let's be clear: When you have been accused of fraud and mishandling the election, there is no good reason to have a shredding company at a place handling the election. Period.
Further: You are making your own assumptions that she doesn't have actual ballots, or that a lawyer that has had more success than you doesn't know what ballots are or aren't.
You're a hypocrite, and you're being hypocritical.
He wants to see Sydneys kracken?
Who doesn't?
Newsmax is like Fox Jr.
They're not really our friends.
I'm only trusting OAN and RSBN, and of course some of you crazy bastards in this place
I agree. It is just enough Rep/Conservative to keep normies there. Not enough info to red pill you or keep up with the biggest info out.
https://thedonald.win/p/11QlFm3Dsa/about-sidneys-shredded-ballots-w/c/
Go Doom on Xbone faggot.
Doomers get the rope before commies just to show them we mean business.
Yup, that's it. You got me.
FUCK YOU
Anaconda is that you?
I told your momma not to tell you the nickname she gave me.
Nice comeback.
I had no idea what you were talking about and didn't realize a comeback was in order.
There's a well known guy on this forum with that name who goes around saying exact same things that you said. Always gets heavily downvoted. So I made a joke and asked if you were him on an alt account.
Ahh, OK. Cool, my bad for not knowing everyone on the site? I do not bend the knee to the almighty Sid & Lin, that's all. Trump will win bigly because it is ordained by the true Almighty. That's what we all want, yes? It will be by the hand of the lords servant Giuliani however, not these faggots paper gods Lin & Sid.
Shouldn't you get back in line to suck Lin's dick while Sid pegs you?
I think I found the gay guy you're looking for. u/HighIQIndividual
See a Doomer on Crack Addict
Look at the scoreboard. Giuliani is way up on your saviors Sid & Lin. How many of their cases have been tossed now? lol, cucks.
Go back to Twitter piece of shit
My post seems to have triggered some faggots. You soy cucks do realize this is theDonald.win, right? Not sid-n-lin-circlejerk-cuck-rally.com?
I don't like that when the guy asks if she has evidence that voting info went overseas, she replies that she has statistics and analysis of vote flipping.
This isn't the first time she (unintentionally?) doesn't answer the direct question about evidence.
I hope she has stuff that's more compelling than what got tossed today in Nevada. This situation is maddening. It's perfectly okay for dead people to vote. WTF
I missed the Nevada hearing today. What happened? They threw it out? The fuck, there was so much evidence??????
Yep.
40,000 people voted twice. 1500 dead people voted.
Judge tossed it. No evidence.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/nevada-judge-denies-trump-campaign-lawsuit-seeking-to-toss-election-results/ar-BB1bDSgU
Yes because she should just tell newsmax everything she has just to satisfy your curiosity
Fuck you.
I mentioned one thing. Not "everything". Are you stupid?
My concern, as stated, is that she can win. Nothing about my curiosity. Asshole.
It's all in the suit, bro. Regardless of what she says on TV. Have you not seen the evidence she has in these Kraken suits?
I've seen it. Just like Nevada. And it was tossed. That's why I hope she has the evidence about data going to Germany or Spain or wherever. Those machines aren't even supposed to be online. So this could be important, and she didn't answer the question. I hope it wasn't intentional.
Might not be able to talk about direct evidence before the judge. They would be unhappy about her doing that.
We have all the evidence. What good is it if there is no honest body to review it and adjudicate based on it?
It's time to go code red, team.
1 million patriots need to surround the SCOTUS when they rule on this. Let them know we don't intend to fuck around.
Backs might need to the SCOTUS to protect them.
They know this as well. We are loyal to the constitution and ONLY the constitution. And God of course, but in terms of the laws of man, we have that great Godly governing document to live by. We honor and will die to protect it if need be. If SCOTUS honors the Constitution of the United States, we will defend them from foreign or domestic enemies to the last of us. We are not loyal to SCOTUS. We are not loyal to Trump. We are patriots. We are loyal to our country and its founding principles. It just so happens that Trump is also one of us and is loyal to the same.
Well said, Patriot.
So much fraud, cheating, lying, and stealing, and so few Congressional GOP representatives seem to be bothered. That’s because swamp likes it that way. It is up to us to save our country, the people, as it always has been. Everyone here should be ready for whatever steps become necessary.
Get three patriots to guard her office asap
It’s not overturning the election it’s proving Trump won fair and square
CNN: Sidney Powell shredded Joe Biden’s ballots and walk away with the evidence in her purse
What is the 11th circuit case she is talking about? At about 1:10 she mentions appeal that was rejected. Um?
Make sure she knows we have software for that! Scan the pieces and run it through the Puzzle Solver!
Saying, "I have a bag of shredded ballots" means nothing. They could be (and likely are) test ballots.
See the witness from yesterday who talked about printing hundreds of ballots so that the machines can be tested. They're identical to real ballots and even have votes filled in. This is required by law and about the only thing they did that followed the law.
Actually, this means slightly less than saying, "I have a witness that will testify that Hugo Chavez rigged his election 20 years ago. Now overturn the 2020 U.S. election".
Still illegal:
42 USCS § 1974 provides that every officer of election shall retain and preserve, for a period of 22 months from the date of any general, special, or primary election of which candidates for the office of President, Vice President, presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, or Resident Commissioner from the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico are voted for, all records and papers which come into his or her possession relating to any application, registration, payment of poll tax, or other act requisite to voting in such election, except that, when required by law, such records and papers may be delivered to another officer of election and except that, if a state or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico designates a custodian to retain and preserve these records and papers at a specified place, then such records and papers may be deposited with such custodian, and the duty to retain and preserve any record or paper so deposited shall devolve upon such custodian. Any officer of election or custodian who willfully fails to comply with these requirements will be fined not more that $ 1,000 and/or imprisoned not more than one year.
Now tell me how testing materials not used in the election fit into to that.
Answer: They don't.
It's possible that Powell could be on to something but what she has, by itself, is nothing. She's on TV again promoting "evidence" that she cannot connected to anything.
"or other act requisite to voting in such election"
"Your honor, here is a bag of test ballot that we shredded/ spoiled so that they could be fraudulently inserted into voting machines. We kept all the bags. Except for the bags that Sidney Powell stole."
You're missing a few key points.
We knew who shredded the ballots for them.
The person in charge of the company basically got scared and released a statement.
I would imagine Sidney went after that instantly.
Yep this. I'll go with Sidney vs. some rando internet deboonker. Damiano needs a good reboonking!
I saw that. Read it again.
All they said was that they were under contract and had been for years, pretty much. I can't blame them because they were essentially getting doxxed by our side after Wood started posting shit on Twitter.
We should ask question about stuff. There is a whole lot of very questionable things. What we should not do is jump to conclusion and start posting shit on Twitter that we can't substantiate.
There are very good reasons to have shredder trucks at places and very bad reasons. We don't know which is true. The correct thing is to attempt to find out before you go blast somebody's information all over Twitter and accuse them of illegal acts.
Let's be clear: When you have been accused of fraud and mishandling the election, there is no good reason to have a shredding company at a place handling the election. Period.
Further: You are making your own assumptions that she doesn't have actual ballots, or that a lawyer that has had more success than you doesn't know what ballots are or aren't.
You're a hypocrite, and you're being hypocritical.