62
Comments (6)
sorted by:
4
couranto 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don’t know if I’d call it trashing. But Perdue is a tone deaf idiot.

3
skyehye 3 points ago +3 / -0

idk i wouldnt take this too seriously. Theyre both probably rinos but unfortunately we need them in the senate. After that we can begin too weed out the rinos and prepare for next round of elections to run against all these assholes.

4
sully 4 points ago +4 / -0

Having two R defectors in the Senate is no different than having two Democrats. The only difference is McConnell is still majority leader.

If both of them win, don't expect them to vote with the R's. We're fucked in the Senate either way, and most decisions will be tied and broken by Pence, and that's best case scenario as long as one other R doesn't defect.

0
Belleoffreedom 0 points ago +1 / -1

Having two R defectors in the Senate is no different than having two Democrats.

wrong.

The only difference is McConnell is still majority leader.

right. And that is YUUUUGE, whether DJT prevails, but even more so if he does not. If we have to do damage control, we need the Senate, because we do not have the House. (Although, we might get it if DJT prevails.)

1
sully 1 point ago +1 / -0

wrong

Okay then, explain.

A 50v50 vote in the senate is a 50v50 vote in the senate. Party affiliation doesn't matter. My point was one extra R defecting, which is entirely possible because of Romney.

Voting for Perdue and Loeffler is only accomplishing keeping McConnell as majority leader and that's pretty much it, which is meaningless if we never get to 50 Senate votes. We need to also focus on overturning losses from other R Senate candidates like John James to really solidity our Senate win. Otherwise we're absolutely fucked, and that' the honest truth.

1
TheReaper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Loeffler has been pretty strongly in the Trump corner on votes so far.