870
Comments (27)
sorted by:
47
rtravisf 47 points ago +47 / -0

Rudy literally shit on him.

34
cuckslasher 34 points ago +35 / -1

imagine being a 30 something soicuck and trying to go all aggressive on RICO Rudi

19
secretbern 19 points ago +19 / -0

Ignorant of his record, believes only what he here’s on NPR and CNN. Foolish move. Rudy took down the mob, rebuilt NYC and stared into the abyss on 9-11. King of the fucking jungle.

19
Okillmakeanaccount 19 points ago +19 / -0

Italians must be embarrassed of this cuck.

15
tom_machine 15 points ago +16 / -1

This faggot’s asshole is probably still sore from Rudy’s epic takedown of the 5 families.

4
Harper42190 4 points ago +4 / -0

underrated comment lol

4
tang81 4 points ago +4 / -0

Eh... every family has a Fredo.

15
MagaChief 15 points ago +15 / -0

how long did it take him to write that bullshit? what a prick

13
KnightKreider 13 points ago +13 / -0

That shit was handed to him to read. These people are all Muppets.

4
Harper42190 4 points ago +4 / -0

He was reading shit ppl tweeted at... someone that was claiming to be a lawyer but posted the fuckin law wrong... that is where he got the idea to try to swear in Rudy lol

3
AlphaOmaga 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tired of these pricks using the word “widespread” when they know this was “tactical”.

Widespread fraud is disputed at this point. Tactical election fraud is real. And that’s all it takes in swing states.

1
sun_wolf 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Targeted election fraud” might be easier to say and more difficult for them to flatly deny. But good angle for sure. They have weaponized the word “widespread” but whenever they weaponize a word, we are able to counter-weaponize another word. That just seems to be the nature of language.

10
generated_name 10 points ago +10 / -0

Where is the 37 cases crap coming from? I hang out here. I watch War Room and Crowder, and listen to Mark Levin. I still can't come up with enough cases, even without including Trump's, that reach that number. In fact this was the first time I've heard it as 37. Before it was 34. And almost every case I can think of weather it was Trump or not, is up for appeal. So they aren't "lost". Who is coming up with that number?

3
Harper42190 3 points ago +3 / -0

CNN, WaPo... who knows

1
sun_wolf 1 point ago +1 / -0

Democrats always attach a number to their lies when they are desperate. I assume some kind of persuasion/brainwashing/social control experiments have been done by the CIA and they have figured out that normies are more likely to believe a lie if it has a number attached to it. “17 Intelligence agencies said there was Russia Collusion!” The power in that statement was always the 17. “97% of scientists!” “72 cents on the dollar!” Notice that once a number is selected, it never changes.

4
Harper42190 4 points ago +4 / -0

He should sue him for real... the second time he said it... he said "you're attempting to seek a pardon"

3
Postal 3 points ago +3 / -0

Doesn't this cuck now have personal security around his home?

1
Monkey_Scrotum_Fever 1 point ago +1 / -0

good he should

3
no_further 3 points ago +3 / -0

Great job Rudy!!

2
BidenMumbling 2 points ago +2 / -0

ooo Shit that was golden. At the end, someone needs to add "YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"

2
lumahumpa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lika a boss

2
TrumpCovid 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good fuck someone needs to punch that degenerate sodomite.

1
ikuyas 1 point ago +1 / -0

he is lightweight

1
swamp_clorox 1 point ago +1 / -0

Notice how they have changed their vocab to "wide spread voting irregularities"

1
secretbern 1 point ago +1 / -0

Love that guy.

1
HotCarl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rudy, a heavyweight, takes on a flyweight. This is why we have weight classes.

1
niconicoreeee 1 point ago +1 / -0

masterclass in BTFOwnage, go Rudy!