So doing nothing and letting dem governors act like faggot dictators in perpetuity is a winning strategy how? Should Lincoln have let Dem governors secede and break up the country? Should Eisenhower have let dem governors enforce segregation and allow dems and their Klan footsoldiers the right to terrorize US Citizens? During a coup and a fraudulent election counter measures will not be sunshine and genial back and forth. And frankly if faced with a Nationalist Right wing dictatorship or an Internationalist Left wing one I'll choose the former.
It should be pretty evident at this point that plenty of well-informed people, rather than tripping over their own rank hypocrisy in cheering alea iacta est as you assume at a glance, may in fact be keenly aware that most of the historical Roman dictators were appointed in times of crisis, to save the Roman Republic, though their reputations have been smeared over the ages by a societal elite fearful of any check on their power, and further, that our Republic is in dire need of aggressive reform which the recent few weeks should have already shown is virtually impossible to achieve via systematic means.
I see you're already embroiled in several other debates in which you've been called out on your own hypocrisy vis-a-vis Honest Habeas Corpus Abe, so I'll leave you to it!
Well the thing is dictatorship is a matter of perspective historically. There's benevolent and malevolent dictators. A fine line for sure but depends which side of the spear you're on.
Very true; I probably would have been a loyalist back then, as I would have supported my King, especially since it wasn't really King George III that was screwing over the colonists, but rather the (ironically elected) Parliament of Great Britain. And ironically, the King actually used his reserve powers to push Parliament to back off and used royal edicts to try and quell the sentiment, but it was too little, too late.
The whole move to Canada thing though--ugh, too cold. Maybe I would have moved to the Bahamas LOL.
I am definitely still a loyalist, though, in 2020--absolutely loyal to His Excellency* Donald Trump, President of the United States of America.
(* His actual legal title; Mr. President being for use inside the US).
Based Level: 100
Down with the rotted republic. Long live King Donald!
WE THEOCRATIC MONARCHIST NOW CUCKS! DEAL WITH IT!
Caesar Donald
That is why I say King Donald rather than Dictator Donald. Dictatorships are a corrupted form of monarchism where the sovereign rules for his benefit rather than that of his nation.
Username checks out.
Consul.
So doing nothing and letting dem governors act like faggot dictators in perpetuity is a winning strategy how? Should Lincoln have let Dem governors secede and break up the country? Should Eisenhower have let dem governors enforce segregation and allow dems and their Klan footsoldiers the right to terrorize US Citizens? During a coup and a fraudulent election counter measures will not be sunshine and genial back and forth. And frankly if faced with a Nationalist Right wing dictatorship or an Internationalist Left wing one I'll choose the former.
We always play by the rules. We always vote. We are peaceful and patient. Doesn't work out so well, I'm afraid.
LMFAO. Cry more, cuck. DJT will be your next president. How do you feel about that?
It should be pretty evident at this point that plenty of well-informed people, rather than tripping over their own rank hypocrisy in cheering alea iacta est as you assume at a glance, may in fact be keenly aware that most of the historical Roman dictators were appointed in times of crisis, to save the Roman Republic, though their reputations have been smeared over the ages by a societal elite fearful of any check on their power, and further, that our Republic is in dire need of aggressive reform which the recent few weeks should have already shown is virtually impossible to achieve via systematic means.
I see you're already embroiled in several other debates in which you've been called out on your own hypocrisy vis-a-vis Honest Habeas Corpus Abe, so I'll leave you to it!
Well the thing is dictatorship is a matter of perspective historically. There's benevolent and malevolent dictators. A fine line for sure but depends which side of the spear you're on.
Finally, another American monarchist on here!!!
In the 1770's they called you loyalists
Very true; I probably would have been a loyalist back then, as I would have supported my King, especially since it wasn't really King George III that was screwing over the colonists, but rather the (ironically elected) Parliament of Great Britain. And ironically, the King actually used his reserve powers to push Parliament to back off and used royal edicts to try and quell the sentiment, but it was too little, too late.
The whole move to Canada thing though--ugh, too cold. Maybe I would have moved to the Bahamas LOL.
I am definitely still a loyalist, though, in 2020--absolutely loyal to His Excellency* Donald Trump, President of the United States of America.
(* His actual legal title; Mr. President being for use inside the US).
Nah, Emperor Donald I or bust.
Rubicon Don!