6289
CROSS THE RUBICON (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by PEPE_the_Frog ago by PEPE_the_Frog +6291 / -2
Comments (648)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
37
pnwhomebrewer 37 points ago +38 / -1

Pompey and the senate were corrupt pieces of shit. Caesar did nothing wrong. Was he perfect? No but he was in the right.

It was the COMMONERS who carried Caesars body in the streets and killed/chased the swamp rat fucks out of town. Caesar had the backing of the soldiers, small business owners, slaves and working class.

Trump will join Caesar as one of the best men to ever live. Taking down swamp rats and slaying grade A pussy.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
1
EtTuRINO 1 point ago +1 / -0

Caesar did nothing wrong

He did plenty wrong. You can say the others were worse at the time but FFS, he literally went around buying elections for people. FYI, he was good friends with Pompey and key political allies but both of their ambitions clashed.

And if it wasn't for Pompey listening to the senate, he would've won the war.

-9
Scipio_Americanus -9 points ago +1 / -10

Umm, no. Caesar was told to withdraw from Gaul and disband his troops. His refusal was breaking the law. He used his legions to attack migrating civilians and enslaved them to sell them for profit. And while Sulla marched on Rome before him, that action was also considered horrific and anti-Republican to Roman historians.

15
pnwhomebrewer 15 points ago +15 / -0

I said Caesar wasn’t perfect. Moral standards then were different then now. You don’t think Pompey and others did fucked up shit too?

And I really don’t give a shit if Caesar was breaking the “law” set in place by Roman bureaucrats. He did what was necessary.

1
EtTuRINO 1 point ago +1 / -0

He did what was necessary.

They were already getting tribute from Gaul. He didn't have to slaughter them, he did it because he was tired of dealing with small insurrections in an area he viewed well below him. He was a man of ambition who didn't want to be stuck in Gaul having to babysit the area all the time.

12
ImperialxWarlord 12 points ago +12 / -0

He was told to do so by a corrupt senate that just needed him to leave his post of governor so he could lose his immunity so they could put him on trial and destroy everything he did. The corruption of the late Roman republic makes our shit show look like a joke.

1
EtTuRINO 1 point ago +1 / -0

And while Sulla marched on Rome before him, that action was also considered horrific and anti-Republican to Roman historians.

Sulla's rival, Marius, created the anti-Republic power struggle that would follow with Caesar. Sulla won a civil war and returned the senate. He isn't considered anti-Republic at all. In fact, he marched on Rome TWICE because the other political party couldn't stop (and never really did) trying to completely take over the republic.