I see your distinction. Now let me draw the parallels.
Before Day ONE of his Presidency: the Obama Administration sabotaged the incoming Administration by pressing false charges against Flynn.
For three years his actions were hobbled by a special counsel that came about as a result of said shenanigans.
He was impeached for actions that he took that were not illegal.
And now they are trying to remove him using a rigged election.
Guess who else had to stop a rigged election to get re-elected? Lincoln.
The democrats have NEVER accepted President Trump as the duly elected POTUS. Everything that happened since November 2016 has been the result of a slow-motion coup against a duly elected President.
And in case you're saying that I'm wrong to say that President Trump isn't the parallel here: consider that in 2000 Al Gore was given the right to challenge the presidential election all the way up to SCOTUS. He conceded only when SCOTUS ruled against him on Dec 13.
There is a case ON THE DOCKET for SCOTUS regarding PA:
I see your distinction. Now let me draw the parallels.
Before Day ONE of his Presidency: the Obama Administration sabotaged the incoming Administration by pressing false charges against Flynn.
For three years his actions were hobbled by a special counsel that came about as a result of said shenanigans.
He was impeached for actions that he took that were not illegal.
And now they are trying to remove him using a rigged election.
Guess who else had to stop a rigged election to get re-elected? Lincoln.
The democrats have NEVER accepted President Trump as the duly elected POTUS. Everything that happened since November 2016 has been the result of a slow-motion coup against a duly elected President.
And in case you're saying that I'm wrong to say that President Trump isn't the parallel here: consider that in 2000 Al Gore was given the right to challenge the presidential election all the way up to SCOTUS. He conceded only when SCOTUS ruled against him on Dec 13.
There is a case ON THE DOCKET for SCOTUS regarding PA:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/20a98.html
This will not be the only case but it will be the first.
The three lawyers who successfully argued against Al Gore before SCOTUS were: Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Comey Barrett.
GUESS WHERE THEY ARE NOW!?
Brush up on your history mate. You're about to see it happen again.