6289
CROSS THE RUBICON (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by PEPE_the_Frog ago by PEPE_the_Frog +6291 / -2
Comments (648)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
aaafirefly123 3 points ago +3 / -0

I would say the Principate were a “Republic in name Only” but they were de facto dictators. The most use the senate had during the principate was providing legitimacy to the Imperator.

It was Diocletian that created the “Dominate” in which he was the divinely ordained absolute ruler of Rome. He created what we would call today an absolute monarchy, but it was one in which succession was determined by appointment not by blood.

This changed with Constantine who took the principle of the dominate and made succession de facto hereditary rather than by appointment.

Constantine’s dynasty was, after all, the first imperial dynasty of the Dominate.

3
ImperialxWarlord 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m aware that the principate was a republic in name only, but the senate did have some power and decision making abilities. They conspired against Domitian and did pick some emperors.

Diocletians tetrarchy was...interesting to say the least.

Sadly even though he made it a de facto hereditary succession it still didn’t fix the issue of succession. Maybe if Crispus had succeeded him he could’ve fixed it but sadly we’ll never know.