Agreed. I mean if you have a lab and manage to get a sample of it you could test what's in it and even get the sequence of whatever mRNA they're using. But that's a pretty heavy investment of both money and knowledge to be able to know for sure what's in these, and normal people probably won't trust an independent scientist even if they are on the level.
If they were going to sneak in a reverse transcriptase enzyme, why not go for an easier vector to integrate like a DNA plasmid?
Seems pretty circuitous and inefficient to me.
the scary thing is we have ZERO way of knowing if any of that stuff is in there, just their WORD
Agreed. I mean if you have a lab and manage to get a sample of it you could test what's in it and even get the sequence of whatever mRNA they're using. But that's a pretty heavy investment of both money and knowledge to be able to know for sure what's in these, and normal people probably won't trust an independent scientist even if they are on the level.
What makes a retrovirus a retrovirus is the inclusion of a reverse transcriptase enzyme, by definition.