Update:
Made a Layman's Explanation video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5FShKVjRdk&t=21s https://www.bitchute.com/video/Qa9QaZkWXt3H/ https://rumble.com/vbmho1-laymans-explanation-of-the-wheel..html
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gEGxdNYkQVz7/
https://twitter.com/KingSolomon006/status/1335090649352327168 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imU52cjeGbA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pVAKm8JqvU
Smoking Gun, Part 2: Ratio Transfers Proved; Entire Algorithm Reversed, net 200,353 votes for Biden in seized precincts in Atlanta. Affidavits signed.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gEGxdNYkQVz7/
Watch the video. You will know.
Summary: Final hijacked state is 287,424 total votes. 242,434 Biden, 42,109 Trump, Net gain 200,325
Final hijacked state is 14.65% Trump.
All hijacked precincts after release report: 93,327 Trump out of 504,700. That is 18.49%, if we subtract the hijacked votes from the final aggregate state we get: 51,218 Trump out of 217,276, which is 23.57% Trump.
That the final hijacked state of all precincts can have their total votes changed to a uniform number, such as 20,000 total votes per precinct, and the percentage remains the same (14.65%), which is proof that a simple linear algebra algorithm was adjusting requisite precinct totals against a flat polarized template.
The precincts seized more than once were most likely to be early in alphanumeric order, proving the software takes the first available precinct from an ordered alphanumeric list by County, Precinct.
1: There are 371 unique precincts were this investigation. 2: There are 182 unique precincts involved in more than one ratio transfer. 3: There are 217 unique ratios were transferred.
4: That… A: Clayton County has only 2 precincts in multi ratio transfers. B: That Dekalb has 19 precincts in multi transfers. C: That Fulton boasts a staggering 157 precincts in multi ratio transfers. D: That Gwinnett has only 3 precincts in multi ratio transfers.
5: In accordance to the Mothersheet and the original SCYTL and NYT Data, there are 1041 total precincts 6: In accordance to the Mothersheet and the original SCYTL and NYT Data, there are 12681 unique overall ratios.
7: That 1.71% of the unique ratios are confirmed, post analysis and investiation, to be true positives, that no false positives were caught, nor any false negatives ignored.
That of these 1.71% of the ratios, (217/12681), 246 precincts from Fulton are involved (66.30% of all precincts caught), and 71 precincts from DeKalb (19.13% of all precincts caught are involved.
8: That DeKalb has 190 precincts from the original database; that Fulton has 383 precincts on the from the original database. Furthermore that this means 37.3% of DeKalb’s precincts are involved, and likewise that 64.2% of Fulton’s precinctswere involved, and that this “Ratio Transfer” phenomenon does not even occur once in several of the counties in the Mothersheet (Rockdale and Newton), only twice in Henry County, and only 6 times in Cobb, which itself has over 100 precincts (thus less than 6% of its precincts have been flagged. Which is ten times as many less than Fulton’s by proportion)."
9: (Explained in video):
That a distinct Wheel Number of 2231 was found, such that the virtual precincts were divided into 23 branches with 97 leaves; all wheel numbers above 2231 fail catastrophically (with polynomial increases of failure in the immediate range above 2231) until the trivial limit at the highest recorded denominator of 3784 (Fulton Precinct AP01A, November 5th, 21:16 AM).
10: That the fraud is proven by the fact that all hijacked precincts in their final states can be filled with the same number of votes per precincts, and it equals the same flip of trump to total (confirming a live algorithm was balancing the zero point average from a blank template using equal weight on each precinct).
Original Source, Spreadsheets, readmes and images used in video: https://gofile.io/d/PnJkyQ https://gofile.io/d/8lbok2
Use LibreOffice (free) to open the spreadsheets. https://www.libreoffice.org/download/download/
Resource links: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/q0n4te5flx https://www.math.purdue.edu/~eremenko/dvi/euler.pdf https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%280.81%29%280.015%29%282000%5E2%29%283%2F%28pi%29%5E2%29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_of_unity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_totient_function# https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Limit_to_Infinity_of_Summation_of_Euler_Phi_Function_over_Square https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkrQ1cjJZfQ&t=7755s
Live Simulation of Ratio Transfer Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes&t=1060s
How to calculate chance of transfer video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1i6fdCG6gs
My love for God. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ES2Ctj6MHjQ&t=22s
The fate of nation is now in your hands.
We cannot unsee what we have seen.
We cannot unhear what we have heard.
Bump it to the top.
Watch it all.
God Bless the United States, our Republic shall not fall this day.
Honorable mention to all pedes, and our data team (that provided the raw SCTYL and NYT data).
Had I not found this website after the election, I never would have had the clues and reports available to me to start my search. The Grand Unification of Ratio Transfers and Fraction Magic has been made manifest.
I salute all of you Patriots.
Our nation has been saved.
Edward Solomon, you're a dang genius. I've been following your YouTube videos and posted a couple of links to them here. You need a translator about half as smart as you to explain to the math illiterate here (I was a math major, but even I have to pause and rewind some of your stuff).
God bless you and your family
I was a math major as well and I'm having to rewind too lol
Came in to say similar things. The way this is being presented and articulated is not at all accessible or digestible. Solomon needs to connect with someone to make a better way of presenting this. The video itself is two and a half hours long, and is a part two video on top of that.
Yeah. Brevity and common language is what raises eyebrows. If something can be presented in 10 (or better, 5) minutes of clear language anyone (like, say, a judge) can understand, THAT is when things tend to happen.
You provide the full data and full explanation too, as attachments or whatever, but you lead with the short, sweet, simple summary.
Bingo. Which is why Matt Braynard has had great success; he triple-checks the double-check on his info and he dumbs-it-down to the end user via the K.I.S.S. (Keep It Simple Stupid) method.
As presented, I can’t even evaluate his videos, and I’m someone that’s fully of the belief that there’s been fraud in this election in the swing states in question, if only because it would be really weird if there were not fraud after 4 years of trump being Orange Hitler and the left making the voting schemes less secure than ever. I understand the gist of what he’s trying to say, but I cannot personally verify this, and I don’t even think I could cleanly tell anyone else about it beyond what the conclusions are. If I understand correctly, that he believes he’s found out how an algorithm was used to spread out fraudulent votes among different precincts to reach whatever total they determined they needed.
I will say that, in all of this, I think the most common and likely source of the most fraud would have come from good old fashion ballot harvesting and allowing votes to be counted that shouldn’t have been while throwing out votes for Trump. I’m sure everyone used all avenues to commit fraud here, but those are likely to be the largest sources of them because they’re the easiest to pull off and get away with. Then they mixed in other forms of fraud, coordinated or not, so that there are so many different layers of cheating that you would have to address all of them, which is really hard. Maybe 5-20K votes from Dominion changes here, 20-30K ballots harvested there from hobos, old folks home here harvested for 5K, throw out 10K Trump votes, allow backdating of ballots from USPS to get another 20K bump if they’re for Biden, etc.
Process violations are the easiest path to victory here, if we can get them up to SCOTUS. Even if there was no fraud they’re bound to have violated all kinds of laws and processes because volunteer workers are a shit show. Especially in the kind of areas we’re taking issue with.
On another note, I think plenty of RINOs were either in on this or would prefer it to happen as well, which makes the waters murkier because legacy media can honestly say that even many of the GOP doesn’t support any of the fraud accusations. Their lives were a lot easier before Trump.
Can we help summarize the findings into simple explanation for laypersons? It must be distilled down to the simplest terms at the start in order for this to be viral.
My best summary so far is “ perfect ratios of Biden and Trump voters are seen simultaneously in multiple precincts all switching together coordinated many times over many days, proving votes were being switched in small numbers at many precincts to add up to cause a large shift in the total vote making it hard to detect. “
The algorithm switched people’s votes (or switched stuffed fake ballots) to perfect ratios distributed over a randomized set of precincts to hide the trail and make it harder to audit (so no one precinct has a huge obvious discrepancy), resulting in the total number of votes needed for Biden to be reached after all precincts are “counted”The proof is because we see the exact same ratio of votes in several precincts at once over many days and they all change coordinated together, proving that the votes at these precincts were being manipulated by an algorithm to give the required total votes when all added up.”
There is no way that the same perfect ratio of Biden and Trump voters voted at the exact same times in many precincts AND all changed to new perfect ratios at the exact same time. And there’s no way these perfect ratios all added up to giving Biden the exact lead he needed to win.
Here is a brief explanation he put together. Example 2 and the simulation are easy to understand
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes
Get it to Colonel Waldron and Rudy Guliani. They will get it distilled.
"There is specific evidence that the vote counts were constructed and adjusted in real time using predictive polling data combined with live vote totals, but with roughly 200,000 of the votes being actively balanced for a 14.7% maximum Trump share of the affected votes. This would only have been possible with precinct coordination with a central location or server via the internet. "
Ballot e-Stuffing.
He has already mentioned he is putting a more clear presentation he will be using.
My confidence in that is low considering how the ‘raw data’ of this has been going. He needs to work together with other people to make this more presentable, I don’t think he’s capable of doing it on his own based on it not having begun with that.
Yeah, honestly, this presentation may expose the entire method and operation of the vote fraud, but it means absolutely nothing to me. Getting to the end and seeing something about the Grand Unification blah blah caused me to discount the entire post, let alone the video. I'm not a mathematician, so I guess I'm totally clueless about the value of this post. It's like someone shouting, "It's Planks Constant! It proves everything!" Meaningless unless one knows what Planks Constant is.
Seems a bit unfair to dismiss it just because we don't understand it.
See if only you had grow up under the common core program, then you would understand. $
Can you give me your best explanation? He might as well be talking mandarin.
Essentially, there is a “natural set” of votes and “flip set” the software uses. These are two predefined percentages of the total vote. Example, 100k votes if 70% are natural and 30% are “flip”, then that means 70k aren’t going to be manipulated but 30k will be used to manipulate. These 30k will be passed into “virtual precincts” within the software itself. These virtual precincts have a predefined ratio applied to them (15:2, 19:2, 15:7, etc) what ratio they decide. There are 3-4 of these virtual precincts within the software that have their own ratio. So, the software can now calculate how many Biden votes he needs of this 30k flip set to meet a certain total percentage they want. Software then sends these 30k votes through these “virtual precincts”, the change the votes. Example, when virtual precinct, if the ratio is 15:2, receives 17 votes it makes 15 Biden and 2 Trump. They do this for all 30k votes. How Trump “broke the algorithm” was the predefined % they used for the total votes in the flip set wasn’t enough to overcome Trumps lead using the “natural set”. So, then comes the Fulton County video of the ladies pulling suitcases out to shove more ballots through the machines.
I can go into more detail but I understand the high level approach Solomon is explaining and I have a software background.
Here is an explanation video he did. Example 2 and the simulation are easy to understand https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes
Thank you. I knew that Trump was winning so much, that's when they called the lid and the pipe broke.
So if there's a physical audit, none of these votes would be able to be verified, correct?
We just need to do another, in person vote.
Very good explanation. I also suspect the pause in counting in Michigan and Wisconsin may have been to increase the size of flip set because they couldn't continue using what the had been without making the ratios so extreme that it would look suspicious. This somehow broke the algorithm and caused the instantaneous increase in Biden votes
One thing not clear to me is if they were flipping a massive amount of votes, wouldn't there be a paper trail and wouldn't this be easily discovered during a hand recount of the paper ballots?
Which is why I didn't ask Edward.
Thank god I gave up after the first 5 minutes when my head started to hurt. Who knows what this mental strain is doing to our physiology :s
I am a triple major: math, physics, computer science. I just gave up and trusted him.
I was not a math major and I have no fucking clue what he is saying but Damn it sounds great!!! Carry the fuck on Patriot!!!!
400lb hacker confirmed
Lmfao
Just his brain
Lol
We should all forward this to dr. Shiva...he seems to have a path to get heard
Agree, and Shiva can explain for normies.
I was a math major aswell. What confused you? I'm asking for my own math satisfaction... I would like a quick math chat... don't get those anymore.
I wasn't confused, just had to back up and replay in a few places to make sure I was following properly. He also was skipping around a bit, which was distracting. I'm confident I could give this presentation for him now if need be, I'm that conversant with what he's done.
I’m not illiterate, but damned if that wouldn’t be much easier to follow in layman terms. I understand that it needs to be like that if it is used for the cause, but the shitty mathematician in me needs the cliff notes. Edited to say thank you for the hard work of putting all of that info. Didn’t mean to sound ungrateful.
Take a look at the simulation this genius did with Starcraft of all things. It's linked here in this thread. Skip ahead to the simulation first, then go back to the beginning for the math behind it, easier to understand that way. He's being logical and building foundation first, but it helps beginners to have the mental images from the simulation in their minds before they see the equations.
Highly poetic that one of the villains in SC2 was the Terran Dominion hahah