Update:
Made a Layman's Explanation video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5FShKVjRdk&t=21s
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Qa9QaZkWXt3H/
https://rumble.com/vbmho1-laymans-explanation-of-the-wheel..html
https://rumble.com/vblspz-smoking-gun-part-2-ratio-transfers-proved-entire-algorithm-reversed-net-200.html
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gEGxdNYkQVz7/
https://twitter.com/KingSolomon006/status/1335090649352327168
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imU52cjeGbA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pVAKm8JqvU
Smoking Gun, Part 2: Ratio Transfers Proved; Entire Algorithm Reversed, net 200,353 votes for Biden in seized precincts in Atlanta. Affidavits signed.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gEGxdNYkQVz7/
Watch the video. You will know.
Summary:
Final hijacked state is 287,424 total votes. 242,434 Biden, 42,109 Trump, Net gain 200,325
Final hijacked state is 14.65% Trump.
All hijacked precincts after release report: 93,327 Trump out of 504,700.
That is 18.49%, if we subtract the hijacked votes from the final aggregate state
we get: 51,218 Trump out of 217,276, which is 23.57% Trump.
That the final hijacked state of all precincts can have their total votes changed to a uniform number, such as 20,000 total votes per precinct, and the percentage remains the same (14.65%), which is proof that a simple linear algebra algorithm was adjusting requisite precinct totals against a flat polarized template.
The precincts seized more than once were most likely to be early in alphanumeric order, proving the software takes the first available precinct from an ordered alphanumeric list by County, Precinct.
1: There are 371 unique precincts were this investigation.
2: There are 182 unique precincts involved in more than one ratio transfer.
3: There are 217 unique ratios were transferred.
4: That…
A: Clayton County has only 2 precincts in multi ratio transfers.
B: That Dekalb has 19 precincts in multi transfers.
C: That Fulton boasts a staggering 157 precincts in multi ratio transfers.
D: That Gwinnett has only 3 precincts in multi ratio transfers.
5: In accordance to the Mothersheet and the original SCYTL and NYT Data, there are 1041 total precincts
6: In accordance to the Mothersheet and the original SCYTL and NYT Data, there are 12681 unique overall ratios.
7: That 1.71% of the unique ratios are confirmed, post analysis and investiation, to be true positives, that no false positives were caught, nor any false negatives ignored.
That of these 1.71% of the ratios, (217/12681), 246 precincts from Fulton are involved (66.30% of all precincts caught), and 71 precincts from DeKalb (19.13% of all precincts caught are involved.
8: That DeKalb has 190 precincts from the original database; that Fulton has 383 precincts on the from the original database. Furthermore that this means 37.3% of DeKalb’s precincts are involved, and likewise that 64.2% of Fulton’s precinctswere involved, and that this “Ratio Transfer” phenomenon does not even occur once in several of the counties in the Mothersheet (Rockdale and Newton), only twice in Henry County, and only 6 times in Cobb, which itself has over 100 precincts (thus less than 6% of its precincts have been flagged. Which is ten times as many less than Fulton’s by proportion)."
9: (Explained in video):
That a distinct Wheel Number of 2231 was found, such that the virtual precincts were divided into 23 branches with 97 leaves; all wheel numbers above 2231 fail catastrophically (with polynomial increases of failure in the immediate range above 2231) until the trivial limit at the highest recorded denominator of 3784 (Fulton Precinct AP01A, November 5th, 21:16 AM).
10: That the fraud is proven by the fact that all hijacked precincts in their final states can be filled with the same number of votes per precincts, and it equals the same flip of trump to total (confirming a live algorithm was balancing the zero point average from a blank template using equal weight on each precinct).
Original Source, Spreadsheets, readmes and images used in video:
https://gofile.io/d/PnJkyQ
https://gofile.io/d/8lbok2
Use LibreOffice (free) to open the spreadsheets.
https://www.libreoffice.org/download/download/
Resource links:
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/q0n4te5flx
https://www.math.purdue.edu/~eremenko/dvi/euler.pdf
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%280.81%29%280.015%29%282000%5E2%29%283%2F%28pi%29%5E2%29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_of_unity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_totient_function#
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Limit_to_Infinity_of_Summation_of_Euler_Phi_Function_over_Square
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkrQ1cjJZfQ&t=7755s
Live Simulation of Ratio Transfer Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes&t=1060s
How to calculate chance of transfer video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1i6fdCG6gs
My love for God.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ES2Ctj6MHjQ&t=22s
The fate of nation is now in your hands.
We cannot unsee what we have seen.
We cannot unhear what we have heard.
Bump it to the top.
Watch it all.
God Bless the United States, our Republic shall not fall this day.
Honorable mention to all pedes, and our data team (that provided the raw SCTYL and NYT data).
Had I not found this website after the election, I never would have had the clues and reports available to me to start my search. The Grand Unification of Ratio Transfers and Fraction Magic has been made manifest.
I salute all of you Patriots.
Our nation has been saved.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v582kPp43Mg
Update:
Made a Layman's Explanation video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5FShKVjRdk&t=21s
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Qa9QaZkWXt3H/
https://rumble.com/vbmho1-laymans-explanation-of-the-wheel..html
---------------------
https://rumble.com/vblspz-smoking-gun-part-2-ratio-transfers-proved-entire-algorithm-reversed-net-200.html
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gEGxdNYkQVz7/
https://twitter.com/KingSolomon006/status/1335090649352327168
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=imU52cjeGbA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pVAKm8JqvU
Smoking Gun, Part 2: Ratio Transfers Proved; Entire Algorithm Reversed, net 200,353 votes for Biden in seized precincts in Atlanta. Affidavits signed.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/gEGxdNYkQVz7/
Watch the video. You will know.
Summary:
Final hijacked state is 287,424 total votes. 242,434 Biden, 42,109 Trump, Net gain 200,325
Final hijacked state is 14.65% Trump.
All hijacked precincts after release report: 93,327 Trump out of 504,700.
That is 18.49%, if we subtract the hijacked votes from the final aggregate state
we get: 51,218 Trump out of 217,276, which is 23.57% Trump.
That the final hijacked state of all precincts can have their total votes changed to a uniform number, such as 20,000 total votes per precinct, and the percentage remains the same (14.65%), which is proof that a simple linear algebra algorithm was adjusting requisite precinct totals against a flat polarized template.
The precincts seized more than once were most likely to be early in alphanumeric order, proving the software takes the first available precinct from an ordered alphanumeric list by County, Precinct.
1: There are 371 unique precincts were this investigation.
2: There are 182 unique precincts involved in more than one ratio transfer.
3: There are 217 unique ratios were transferred.
4: That…
A: Clayton County has only 2 precincts in multi ratio transfers.
B: That Dekalb has 19 precincts in multi transfers.
C: That Fulton boasts a staggering 157 precincts in multi ratio transfers.
D: That Gwinnett has only 3 precincts in multi ratio transfers.
5: In accordance to the Mothersheet and the original SCYTL and NYT Data, there are 1041 total precincts
6: In accordance to the Mothersheet and the original SCYTL and NYT Data, there are 12681 unique overall ratios.
7: That 1.71% of the unique ratios are confirmed, post analysis and investiation, to be true positives, that no false positives were caught, nor any false negatives ignored.
That of these 1.71% of the ratios, (217/12681), 246 precincts from Fulton are involved (66.30% of all precincts caught), and 71 precincts from DeKalb (19.13% of all precincts caught are involved.
8: That DeKalb has 190 precincts from the original database; that Fulton has 383 precincts on the from the original database. Furthermore that this means 37.3% of DeKalb’s precincts are involved, and likewise that 64.2% of Fulton’s precinctswere involved, and that this “Ratio Transfer” phenomenon does not even occur once in several of the counties in the Mothersheet (Rockdale and Newton), only twice in Henry County, and only 6 times in Cobb, which itself has over 100 precincts (thus less than 6% of its precincts have been flagged. Which is ten times as many less than Fulton’s by proportion)."
9: (Explained in video):
That a distinct Wheel Number of 2231 was found, such that the virtual precincts were divided into 23 branches with 97 leaves; all wheel numbers above 2231 fail catastrophically (with polynomial increases of failure in the immediate range above 2231) until the trivial limit at the highest recorded denominator of 3784 (Fulton Precinct AP01A, November 5th, 21:16 AM).
10: That the fraud is proven by the fact that all hijacked precincts in their final states can be filled with the same number of votes per precincts, and it equals the same flip of trump to total (confirming a live algorithm was balancing the zero point average from a blank template using equal weight on each precinct).
Original Source, Spreadsheets, readmes and images used in video:
https://gofile.io/d/PnJkyQ
https://gofile.io/d/8lbok2
Use LibreOffice (free) to open the spreadsheets.
https://www.libreoffice.org/download/download/
Resource links:
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/q0n4te5flx
https://www.math.purdue.edu/~eremenko/dvi/euler.pdf
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%280.81%29%280.015%29%282000%5E2%29%283%2F%28pi%29%5E2%29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_of_unity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_totient_function#
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Limit_to_Infinity_of_Summation_of_Euler_Phi_Function_over_Square
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkrQ1cjJZfQ&t=7755s
Live Simulation of Ratio Transfer Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes&t=1060s
How to calculate chance of transfer video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1i6fdCG6gs
My love for God.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ES2Ctj6MHjQ&t=22s
The fate of nation is now in your hands.
We cannot unsee what we have seen.
We cannot unhear what we have heard.
Bump it to the top.
Watch it all.
God Bless the United States, our Republic shall not fall this day.
--------------------
Honorable mention to all pedes, and our data team (that provided the raw SCTYL and NYT data).
Had I not found this website after the election, I never would have had the clues and reports available to me to start my search. The Grand Unification of Ratio Transfers and Fraction Magic has been made manifest.
I salute all of you Patriots.
Our nation has been saved.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v582kPp43Mg
Edward Solomon, you're a dang genius. I've been following your YouTube videos and posted a couple of links to them here. You need a translator about half as smart as you to explain to the math illiterate here (I was a math major, but even I have to pause and rewind some of your stuff).
God bless you and your family
I was a math major as well and I'm having to rewind too lol
Came in to say similar things. The way this is being presented and articulated is not at all accessible or digestible. Solomon needs to connect with someone to make a better way of presenting this. The video itself is two and a half hours long, and is a part two video on top of that.
Yeah. Brevity and common language is what raises eyebrows. If something can be presented in 10 (or better, 5) minutes of clear language anyone (like, say, a judge) can understand, THAT is when things tend to happen.
You provide the full data and full explanation too, as attachments or whatever, but you lead with the short, sweet, simple summary.
Bingo. Which is why Matt Braynard has had great success; he triple-checks the double-check on his info and he dumbs-it-down to the end user via the K.I.S.S. (Keep It Simple Stupid) method.
Yep. I think the problem is that highly-intelligent people assume that everyone can operate at their level, and this is HUGELY not so. They have a very severely distorted assessment of others' capabilities to absorb, process and understand complicated information.
While it's not great for communicating with highly-intelligent, high-bandwidth people, K.I.S.S. is enormously effective on the population at large.
Yup. Smart people assume everyone else is smart too, and that they're nothing special.
Dunning-Kruger effect..
Bingo.
I think even very intelligent people just simply forget to dumb down the nomenclature while explaining. They know better but just like most people force of habit takes over.
Yup. Happened to me many times. Gotta have continual awareness of it while speaking (or writing) for a general audience.
A mathematical calculation is used to distribute a number of votes in a particular precinct, mostly to Biden, then later, the function Transfers to a different random precinct, to continue to add to the vote update there. The same calculated Ratio is used when the Transfer is made into the next precinct. (The associated video provides evidence of the scheme and explains each time this transfer happens.) —> This Continues using a set of related Ratios which are applied through various precincts and controlled along a weighted average until you have the totals you wanted.
off-topic but I read "K.I.S.S. (Keep It Simple Stupid)" in Dwight Schrute's voice
Great advice, hurts my feelings every time
As presented, I can’t even evaluate his videos, and I’m someone that’s fully of the belief that there’s been fraud in this election in the swing states in question, if only because it would be really weird if there were not fraud after 4 years of trump being Orange Hitler and the left making the voting schemes less secure than ever. I understand the gist of what he’s trying to say, but I cannot personally verify this, and I don’t even think I could cleanly tell anyone else about it beyond what the conclusions are. If I understand correctly, that he believes he’s found out how an algorithm was used to spread out fraudulent votes among different precincts to reach whatever total they determined they needed.
I will say that, in all of this, I think the most common and likely source of the most fraud would have come from good old fashion ballot harvesting and allowing votes to be counted that shouldn’t have been while throwing out votes for Trump. I’m sure everyone used all avenues to commit fraud here, but those are likely to be the largest sources of them because they’re the easiest to pull off and get away with. Then they mixed in other forms of fraud, coordinated or not, so that there are so many different layers of cheating that you would have to address all of them, which is really hard. Maybe 5-20K votes from Dominion changes here, 20-30K ballots harvested there from hobos, old folks home here harvested for 5K, throw out 10K Trump votes, allow backdating of ballots from USPS to get another 20K bump if they’re for Biden, etc.
Process violations are the easiest path to victory here, if we can get them up to SCOTUS. Even if there was no fraud they’re bound to have violated all kinds of laws and processes because volunteer workers are a shit show. Especially in the kind of areas we’re taking issue with.
On another note, I think plenty of RINOs were either in on this or would prefer it to happen as well, which makes the waters murkier because legacy media can honestly say that even many of the GOP doesn’t support any of the fraud accusations. Their lives were a lot easier before Trump.
Fucking hell, my man. I work in finance, but couldn't understand half the shit OP's video was talking about. Thanks for dumbing it down a bit. This makes a lot more sense!
Thank you for this. It helps make it a little more clear to non-math majors.
Ok, I've watched his explanation now and I can see how he converged on the natural:fraud distribution, but there is one big problem with all of this:
It means that ballot stuffing had to accompany the vote distribution algorithm across all these different precincts. How was that done in so many different places? If they did it - we need smoking gun evidence of one of the accomplices doing the actual ballot stuffing, as nothing less is going to convince a judge.
That's pretty much what it comes down to. Patriot investigators have to audit all the precincts in the Reference Sheet in the spreadsheet file.
You don’t have to do it locally. Ballots without downticket votes can be loaded in the main fraud centers and distributed anywhere. This is why the push for the consolidated harvesting operations.
So rig it electronically to get the desired goldilocks win for Biden, then inject fraud ballots on site as needed to cover their tracks? Am I getting that right?
Dumbing it way down
Natural set is 500 - 400 Trump. Fraud set has to flip that to 515 - 500 Biden.
So the algorithm covertly injects 115 fake Biden ballots in the electronic results as they report out live and after which they have to be physically added to to the actual ballot pile on site so the books balance at the end.
Am I getting that right?
I like you.
This was just a sophisticated ballot stuffing. They use a computer algorithm to spread their stuffing as even as possible in real time so that it might go unnoticed. It was to make it appear close and NOT suspicious. In a closer race these things may have been virtually undetectable, or we may not have looked. The clear cases of fraud with 98% vote counts and 300% turn outs is what alerted us to it.
This analysis by Edward Solomon is a historic moment. I don't know who or what tipped him off but this is incredible.
The commies who programmed the algorithm fubbernucked themselves by using a discrete number of precinct update target ratios and then never figured someone would notice those ratios moving unchanged from one precinct to another in consecutive updates. They won't make that mistake again
It wasn't just that they reported the same ratio at consecutive times, it was actually incredibly unlikely that they would ever report the same ratio at all. The relevant counterpoint would I guess be the existence of hash collisions and birthday attacks, but I think it's probably not a very good argument when the number he gave was on the order of 10,000 I think and not just 365.
And if you went to audit, you’d find minor discrepancies in each precinct and unless you looked at every single precinct you’d probably not be able to overturn the election.
This is where there is a serious problem with this theory. GA claims to have done a hand count audit. Forget signatures for a moment - just consider ballots, ballot envelopes, and the tabulation numbers from the voting machines. If those counts match - same # of ballots as same # of envelopes as same # of tabulation numbers, then that means the ballot box stuffing had to occur wherever the algorithm redistributed the votes. So we need evidence of that. Is his analysis correct? Theoretically, yes. But if we cannot show smoking gun evidence of the actual physical ballot stuffing in the "virtual precincts", then no judge is ever going to take it seriously.
And even then it's not uncommon for recounts to shift votes in small numbers one way or another. You can just run the gambit that no one will check out, and then explain it away as a glitch.
It confirmed it as I watched it.i travel for a living and would never believed someone as unpopular/lacking in support would have won legit.
Well said and all true!
Ballots harvesting/stuffing is probably a supplement to the machine manipulation, meaning that it does not have a huge discrepancy in case of recount. It is also strange that states allow for recount rather easily as if they knew nothing would be found but refused to do the audit.
Dude, the wheel is the clear
Can we help summarize the findings into simple explanation for laypersons? It must be distilled down to the simplest terms at the start in order for this to be viral.
My best summary so far is “ perfect ratios of Biden and Trump voters are seen simultaneously in multiple precincts all switching together coordinated many times over many days, proving votes were being switched in small numbers at many precincts to add up to cause a large shift in the total vote making it hard to detect. “
The algorithm switched people’s votes (or switched stuffed fake ballots) to perfect ratios distributed over a randomized set of precincts to hide the trail and make it harder to audit (so no one precinct has a huge obvious discrepancy), resulting in the total number of votes needed for Biden to be reached after all precincts are “counted”The proof is because we see the exact same ratio of votes in several precincts at once over many days and they all change coordinated together, proving that the votes at these precincts were being manipulated by an algorithm to give the required total votes when all added up.”
There is no way that the same perfect ratio of Biden and Trump voters voted at the exact same times in many precincts AND all changed to new perfect ratios at the exact same time. And there’s no way these perfect ratios all added up to giving Biden the exact lead he needed to win.
Here is a brief explanation he put together. Example 2 and the simulation are easy to understand
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes
Get it to Colonel Waldron and Rudy Guliani. They will get it distilled.
"There is specific evidence that the vote counts were constructed and adjusted in real time using predictive polling data combined with live vote totals, but with roughly 200,000 of the votes being actively balanced for a 14.7% maximum Trump share of the affected votes. This would only have been possible with precinct coordination with a central location or server via the internet. "
Ballot e-Stuffing.
He has already mentioned he is putting a more clear presentation he will be using.
My confidence in that is low considering how the ‘raw data’ of this has been going. He needs to work together with other people to make this more presentable, I don’t think he’s capable of doing it on his own based on it not having begun with that.
Yeah, honestly, this presentation may expose the entire method and operation of the vote fraud, but it means absolutely nothing to me. Getting to the end and seeing something about the Grand Unification blah blah caused me to discount the entire post, let alone the video. I'm not a mathematician, so I guess I'm totally clueless about the value of this post. It's like someone shouting, "It's Planks Constant! It proves everything!" Meaningless unless one knows what Planks Constant is.
Seems a bit unfair to dismiss it just because we don't understand it.
I think that's the premise how this entire thing has been perpetrated. As soon as you start talking about groups conspiring together, or semi complex fraud, we are programmed to shut off. It's human nature and because of AI and mass data collection the powers that be understand that better now than ever.
Not to mention decades of fake news has dulled us to actual reality.
My father legit thinks biden won because it's too much to fraud too commit.,he dosent understand that digitization has made old school ballot stuffing a thing of the past, and thinks biden squeaked by because trump talks mean.dosent help he still thinks the news would be reporting possible fraud.
The point is that, fair or not, that is exactly what most people are going to do.
Well, as long as the right people understand it that matters most.
Having worked in the legal field, I assure you that the majority are not intelligent enough to grasp complicated, technical explanations without it being significantly dumbed down.
Absolutely agree. I just poorly stated my inability to understand it made it almost impossible for me to appreciate it. I certainly don't want to take away from it's value just because I don't understand.
See if only you had grow up under the common core program, then you would understand. $
Can you give me your best explanation? He might as well be talking mandarin.
Essentially, there is a “natural set” of votes and “flip set” the software uses. These are two predefined percentages of the total vote. Example, 100k votes if 70% are natural and 30% are “flip”, then that means 70k aren’t going to be manipulated but 30k will be used to manipulate. These 30k will be passed into “virtual precincts” within the software itself. These virtual precincts have a predefined ratio applied to them (15:2, 19:2, 15:7, etc) what ratio they decide. There are 3-4 of these virtual precincts within the software that have their own ratio. So, the software can now calculate how many Biden votes he needs of this 30k flip set to meet a certain total percentage they want. Software then sends these 30k votes through these “virtual precincts”, the change the votes. Example, when virtual precinct, if the ratio is 15:2, receives 17 votes it makes 15 Biden and 2 Trump. They do this for all 30k votes. How Trump “broke the algorithm” was the predefined % they used for the total votes in the flip set wasn’t enough to overcome Trumps lead using the “natural set”. So, then comes the Fulton County video of the ladies pulling suitcases out to shove more ballots through the machines.
I can go into more detail but I understand the high level approach Solomon is explaining and I have a software background.
Here is an explanation video he did. Example 2 and the simulation are easy to understand https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes
Thank you. I knew that Trump was winning so much, that's when they called the lid and the pipe broke.
So if there's a physical audit, none of these votes would be able to be verified, correct?
We just need to do another, in person vote.
I believe he said he has given the info to those in higher places and boots are on the ground to certain precincts. He knows what specific presents were a part of this from the software perspective. The precincts used are changed throughout the night. The precincts don’t make, the software chooses which ones it will use their votes. But there were quite a few in Fulton it used and he points out the exact ones which can be audited.
This sounds exactly like what the Colonel was starting to explain in Michigan hearing, so I'm pretty sure the right people know.
Very good explanation. I also suspect the pause in counting in Michigan and Wisconsin may have been to increase the size of flip set because they couldn't continue using what the had been without making the ratios so extreme that it would look suspicious. This somehow broke the algorithm and caused the instantaneous increase in Biden votes
Or that is what the day before Election Day “software updates” were for.
I think the pause happened because Trump won 3% plus of day of super voters that were Democrat.
The base they were adding these votes to was not as big as they thought it would be as they hadn't figured Trump would have "Reagan Democrats"
One thing not clear to me is if they were flipping a massive amount of votes, wouldn't there be a paper trail and wouldn't this be easily discovered during a hand recount of the paper ballots?
Which is why I didn't ask Edward.
Thank god I gave up after the first 5 minutes when my head started to hurt. Who knows what this mental strain is doing to our physiology :s
I am a triple major: math, physics, computer science. I just gave up and trusted him.
I was not a math major and I have no fucking clue what he is saying but Damn it sounds great!!! Carry the fuck on Patriot!!!!
ALL BRAIN
400lb hacker confirmed
Lmfao
Just his brain
Lol
We should all forward this to dr. Shiva...he seems to have a path to get heard
Agree, and Shiva can explain for normies.
I was a math major aswell. What confused you? I'm asking for my own math satisfaction... I would like a quick math chat... don't get those anymore.
I wasn't confused, just had to back up and replay in a few places to make sure I was following properly. He also was skipping around a bit, which was distracting. I'm confident I could give this presentation for him now if need be, I'm that conversant with what he's done.
I’m not illiterate, but damned if that wouldn’t be much easier to follow in layman terms. I understand that it needs to be like that if it is used for the cause, but the shitty mathematician in me needs the cliff notes. Edited to say thank you for the hard work of putting all of that info. Didn’t mean to sound ungrateful.
Take a look at the simulation this genius did with Starcraft of all things. It's linked here in this thread. Skip ahead to the simulation first, then go back to the beginning for the math behind it, easier to understand that way. He's being logical and building foundation first, but it helps beginners to have the mental images from the simulation in their minds before they see the equations.
Highly poetic that one of the villains in SC2 was the Terran Dominion hahah
BTW, if you haven't already, you need to connect with Shiva at MIT. He'll welcome your analysis and shouldn't be ego-centric from what I've seen.
His Twitter DM's are open. Though I'm not sure if he reads any of it.
The problem with any math-based analysis is that if the judge does not dismiss this outright then the defence is allowed to and gonna bring their own math experts that will attest the results are not mathematically impossible.
The nice thing about math. Your expert can say 2+2=5 but he can't make it Stick
I guess, but with something as complicated as this, it seems like it would be too easy to have your expert "debunk" it in some convoluted way so that the judge would have no idea who was right.
Whoever comes firstest with the mostest normally has the upper hand, and it's a lot easier to defend your position when the data backs it up as opposed to having to create the appropriate data to try and argue the opposite. Though I won't deny that seems to be well within the left's wheelhouse.
It’s not a math. It’s a person that designed an algorithm that matches the expected outcome. He knew the numbers that he needs to produce so he found an algorithm that would generate them. However, that doesn’t prove this algorithm was installed on the machines.
So this is not a case of 2+2 = 5. It is a case of one math expert says if 4 = 2 + 2 whereas another expert saying 4 = 3 + 1, that is, if one knows the results one can create more than one algorithm that would generate them.
That’s why none of 40-odd cases allege fraud (apart from lawsuits filed by Sideny)
Not going to argue math with you. There's the fractional odds your example can't answer. I over simplified tongue in cheek with 2+2. The odds of these fractions landing just how they did again and again approach astronomically small. But yeah, you can be the lawyer who claims it's possible to flip a coin heads 50000 times in a row. I'll be with the lawyer on the other side saying, "show me".
The lawyer wouldn’t say that. They would just bring their own math experts who would show that different algorithms might have been possible. Maybe Biden was getting 70% but 20% were switched to Trump (hypothetical defence).
Personally I think that this algorithm did exist but it involved mail in ballots. The results were checked in real time and when needed new ballots were “discovered” in suitcases.
That’s why recount didn’t uncover any issues so the only way to would be to either question voter registrations or preform signature verifications.
What are some landmark fraud cases? How is the evidence in those cases presented? We're gonna need some graphic arts and video production talent to present these findings.
Do you mean election-wise? So far none of the cases filed by Trump allege fraud.
If you look at Rudy’s PA case - it is about ballot curing.
No, I mean tough to prove fraud cases, like money laundering, or embezzlement. Any cases where sophisticated numerical analysis was required in evidence presentation. Then we can emulate textbook best in class fraud evidence methods and apply them to these election fraud cases. And then have it so airtight My Cousin Vinny could present it in court.
To secure a conviction any fraud case would require hard evidence to be presented - bank account statements showing fraudulent transactions, CCTV evidence and so on.
Statistical analysis you are thinking of can be used to locate bank accounts that may be used by fraudsters, for instance to locate accounts used by pyramid schemes, however that would be just a starting point, not the actual evidence.
In this case, it the fraudsters are not total amateurs, they would have already removed fradulent software making it impossible to prove the fraud.
Ok, let's just take one imaginary precinct and walk it through the fraud process.
Precinct A closes with 1,000 votes tallied. 1,000 physical paper ballots are run through the tabulator. Trump got 700 votes. Biden got 300 votes. These votes are all tallied when the poll closes at 7pm, correct?
So what happens now? Do the precinct know that it was 700 Trump, 300 Biden then and there? Do they record this number before reporting it? Do they put the tally on a USB drive and physically drive it a central location where it is officially added as a precinct tally?
Now Dominion software runs it's flip algorithm and changes the tally. Doesn't matter what it changes it to, just that it changes. Would the precinct people know that this happened if they later check the Secretary of State website and it shows 690 Trump 310 Biden?
The Antrim County Michigan people caught something because it was a 6,000 vote swing that flipped a Red County to Blue. But what if it had only flipped it from 70% Red 30% Blue, to 65% Red 35% Blue?
Would local precincts be able to have a record of that discrepancy? Or are all the physical paper votes turned into virtual image votes, and then later the physical votes are changed at the polling location to match? They shred or burn 50 Trump ballots, and sneak in 50 Biden ballots, so in case the precinct gets audited, the physical votes match?
What are the Records chain of custody process that ends with final numbers by precincts and counties that end up posted to the Secretary of State website?
With this logic one could argue that it’s not impossible the opposite algorithm was installed, an algorithm that would be switching votes from Biden to Trump. And one county was switched fromTrump to Biden as a cover up.
Many scenarios can be imagined to explain the results however that does not mean that any of them is true.
Another this is this algorithm hypothesis cannot be reconciled with mail in voting fraud. What’s the point of bringing suitcases of votes if the machines take care of everything?
https://twitter.com/va_shiva
Is this getting stickied?
STICK - Y! STICK - Y! STICK - Y!
Slowest sticky in the west
Here LOTS OF MEAT ON THE BONE!!!
KEEP the LOVE here in TD. Turn negative energy into positive energy.
https://thedonald.win/p/11QlFpRr4n/extra-extra-read-all-about-it-sa/
Took me most of the day to get post stickied... Finally :)
re: "Let me tell you what I found" "I have Reverse Engineered the entire Algorithm from start to finish, how ESS and Dominion operate." "I've already signed affidavits. I will appear in court and testify" "I will be asking for federal protective custody shortly after uploading this video" https://thedonald.win/p/11QlFpRaYp/-let-me-tell-you-what-i-found-i-/
IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND IT- DONT DOOM ON IT CAUSE IT HAS MUSIC
A 14 hours later SONIC BOOM
Ultimate Low Flying Jets Sonic BOOM Compilation
How do you explain this to a judge?
Slideshow presentation and a video and a blackboard.
Is this proof though....I’m worried a judge would say something that even if it’s mathematically impossible....he can’t disenfranchise all those fabricated voters.
You might have a better chance if you actually hit a Judge over the head with a blackboard....not advocating scholastic violence tho. ;-)
It's proof because I can put the same number (like 25,000) into the final count of each hijacked precinct, and apply the reported ratio to that number 25,000, instead of the actual reported totals, and get the same percent flip Trump to Total.
There's only two sets of numbers that can do that: The actual reported numbers, or the same number in every precinct, proving the algorithm started with an evenly weighted wheel centered on the desired average (flip rate).
No other set of numbers can
Great work...I assume you have contacted the campaign?
yes
I am also wondering if theyve been in touch with you. The best way we can help is by pointing people to this post and getting a mod sticky would help tons.
No reply makes me feel hopeful that they did!
Find a machine (like the one they are grabbing today from the really small precinct in PA) and apply your numbers and it's numbers and SLAM DUNK. GAME OVER. BOOM.
Will people who are stupid understand this? Like the common denominator IQ in this country or people who are just bad with numbers in general? I hope so. I know there are some pretty ignorant people out there and it appears that most of them have weaseled their ways into positions of power.
Thanks for all your hard work on this, too, by the way.
This is what I am worried about but he says he has precise slides so I'm going to hope and trust they are made for the normal to low intelligence people out there.
I am stupid and I cannot follow this. Please help.
I'm not stupid and couldn't follow this, so you probably aren't either. I had to read several of the comments just to get the idea. One of the simplistic explanations was still hard to understand. I am hopeful someone will be able to explain it better since I do want to understand. It kinda sounds like this guy figured out what the algorithm did, and is able to reproduce it across multiple precincts. Something that should be statistically impossible. I think.
Example 2 and the simulation explain it well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes
Example 2 and the simulation explain it well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes
Example 2 and the simulation explain it well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes
I have no idea what any of those paragraphs you typed mean. I hope the white collar commies in the courts and legislature can figure this out.
I am a paid hammer swinger and a freelance smart alek, so this is above my pay grade.
Example 2 and the simulation explain it well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes
If you swing a hammer you know what a carpenter square is. Notice how easy the square makes doing your common tasks? Now imagine that in the software in the voting machines they have a kind of carpenter square that takes votes away. Kinda like how they haven't made a 2x4 for years that's actually two inches by 4 real inches. Where did all that wood go? Where did all those votes go?
See? Easy
Choyna.
Thats the answer.
LOL, I guess that is as deep as this is gonna get for me. I gotta get back to stacking blocks. This lego fortress isnt gonna build itself.
With paper ballots, It should point to which closets have skeletons and tell you ahead of time how many skeletons you will find in each and every closets. Skeletons are fraudulent votes and closets are precincts.
That judge would have to be cock blocking.
Like the lady said in Michigan, THEY'RE COCK BLOCKING US.
Cock blocking is probably the biggest concern right now though, with the RINOs, the FBI, the CIA, and the DOJ preferring to do nothing and let Biden steal the election over actually investigating anything or taking allegations of election fraud seriously.
I heard you mention in the video you will be presenting. Is that true and is there ready a designated time and place you are?
I had sort of problems following through. I recognized ideas and parts but i couldn't piece it all together. I think if the Presentation/Video gets reworked/revised a couple times that it will be clearer.
I second the motion!
That's not a good idea. You don't think the opposition has agents on this site? They'd LOVE a preview of his data and analysis he's going to present to the judge
That should be enough as a probable cause for a judge to issue a warrant.
And weed
Start with a single ratio or formula. That's the heart of your evidence and it's critical to get it out early, since you might only have the court's full attention for a few minutes at most. A formula is sexier because it looks very scientific, but if you can distill it down to just a simple ratio those numbers will stick in the court's head much more readily, and you can keep returning to it throughout the presentation.
Then you build on that by providing a few examples. It helps if you pull them randomly from the data set, so it doesn't look like you're cherry-picking. But it may actually be more impactful in the long run to choose precincts with a greater net vote theft. Showing precincts where only a few dozen or a few hundred votes were flipped is counter-productive when you're trying to prove many hundreds of thousands of votes were stolen. Walk each example through the math to completion.
Next you show how your ratio/formula applies to the entire data set. You can simply scroll through a simplified table of data and point to the appearance of the ratio/formula on every line -- as OP has done in his video a few times.
Finally, you show the total number of stolen votes for the state using this method. And follow immediately with the real, unmolested vote totals per-candidate. This is your finishing move. If you organized the data thoughtfully you can present all of this in 10 minutes, with a little practice, and your evidence will appear irrefutable. Who can refute math?
Then if the court wants to wade into the full tables and check your work you can show each individual calculation cell-by-cell and prove it sound. But realistically you'd only have to do this with 3-5 additional precincts. Defense may want to look at it more than that but the court will rightly see it as wasting time. Cut them off and offer to provide the full evidence to their expert for further evaluation.
Username checks out.
Love the username.
Great response from someone who can swim in both seas.
Thanks. I think it's absolutely imperative not to get too "in the weeds" on the spreadsheets right out of the gate. Those huge tables are overwhelming and complex to the point of absurdity. They're critical later, when you want the defense to cross-examine the data and ask questions of the analyst. But they aren't especially convincing to the judge - who almost certainly isn't a math expert - nor to the public. And like it or not, this information needs to be packaged for the public.
This is great thinking. Tell a quick short story and set the hook early.
Sounds good, my only caution is it can become confusing. If you do not understand the nature of the formulas in use, it may be difficult to conceptualize the impact. I fear this could be in the realm of taking your word for it.
That would be really dramatic. How well does OP's Spreadsheet Wizardry extend to 2D animation? They might need some help with it. But all the data is there if anyone wants to play with it.
with a gun
I am convinced this was an Act of God, divine intervention. The Lord steered me in the right direction.
This is the reason God put me on this earth.
I am a lifelong atheist but seeing your videos and explanations are honestly giving me second-doubts (real, genuine second-doubts) for the first time in my life. You are a genius, doing highly technical work in a field in which you have studied for years and years. You needed to bring several areas of technical proficiency to bear at the same time to defeat this algorithm, but then on top of that you needed to understand it on such a deep level that you can explain it to other people too. I understand what that is like. I am also a genius. I have had my IQ tested many times and consistently score between 155 and 165. I know what it's like to walk through life never having a deep conversation with someone who is your intellectual equal (though there are many equally-valid ways of measuring value, that doesn't help when you're trying to connect with people). I know the constant stress of needing to break down your thoughts into easily-digestible chunks that you can feed to the people around you so you can try to make them understand enough of your mind to connect with them.
I only just found your videos today and just spent more than 3 hours watching them at length and following along with your conclusions. What you have uncovered is not just evidence, it is verifiable, undeniable proof of deliberate, pre-meditated fraud committed at a nation level. There are probably less than a million people living on this earth that possess the natural mental capabilities to even learn to balance all the difference skill sets you brought to bear in detecting this fraud. And not only would you have to have these advanced and complex skills, you would need to be able to hold a lot of information in your mind at the same time while you navigated through this sea of data. Of the million people living on this earth even capable (if trained) of reaching this level of mastery of so many disciplines, how many are living in America? 40,000? How many have chosen to enter even the tangentially-related fields of advanced mathematics and computer science necessary to bring that intellect to bear? 100? 200? How many of them have spent time specifically investigating fraud the way you have and had knowledge of the various schemes that could be used and knew the tools and methods to try to detect them? 10? 20? How many of them are FUCKING PATRIOTS, BRAVE ENOUGH TO QUITE LITERALLY RISK THEIR LIFE TO STAND UP AND EXPOSE THIS??? ONE! ONE FUCKING PERSON!! JUST YOU!!
What will happen to us if you don't make it to court?? WE WILL BE LOST!! This scheme is SO FUCKING SOPHISTICATED. SO WELL ORCHESTRATED. SO IMPOSSIBLY HARD TO DETECT. You might honestly be the only man or woman living today with the means, motive and opportunity to shine a light on this. You are certainly the only one brave enough to do so. The thought of you not making it to court terrifies me. The thought of you not being able to convince a judge that this is real terrifies me. How can you?? You are smarter than any judge you're put in the same room with. At a certain point they will have to put their faith in you, that you're not trying to mislead them, and you will have to argue against nefarious actors trying to introduce alternative interpretations of the data to mislead these judges. The scheme is set up to produce doubt in so many ways. The future of this nation, possibly the freedom of the entire world, rests on your ability to make someone understand what you're trying to tell them. And what if the judge has been compromised? What if they've been threatened? What if THEY ARE NOT AS BRAVE AS YOU! We will be lost, all of us. I don't have the background you do, but if called on I believe that I could recreate the entire data set you have collected and understand it sufficiently deeply to present it to a judge... but that can't happen. I wasn't chosen for this. I don't have the reputation you do to put weight behind my words. I have other skills that I have perfected and in which I perform at a high level and I will bring them to bear to support this cause in other ways. I will do my utmost to save this country. I will do my utmost to follow in your example and put my life on the line if I must, if it will help to do so. I wish you luck. I know there's a lot you can't talk about yet, but if we both survive what is to come I would like to help you in other ways. If you get this hysterical rant of a comment, know that I wish you luck on your journey, because you will need it. Please don't be discouraged that your message isn't getting out to as many people as you think ought to see it, it's getting to the right eyes, to the people that need to see it. I believe all the freedom-loving patriots in this nation (and others) are with you in spirit even if they don't understand what you're doing or why, even if they haven't heard your message. Your fight is their fight too. Go with the righteousness of God on your side.
I read this all – and I love the contrast between the opening phrase of your first sentence, and your closing sentence.
I’ll take your claims of genius on faith (pun intended). So God has clearly given you an amazing brain, and it’s in part that brain that allows you to recognise the patterns which reveal His hand at work.
But using your brain to understand God is like using your sense of smell to taste food: it’s part of the toolkit, but it’s not all of it. You also have a spirit (which is why every culture has always understood man to be ‘tripartate’, ie body, soul/mind, and spirit). God Himself is spirit, and we connect to him with our spirit. Those of higher IQ often find it harder to connect with God initially, as they are used to dealing with the rational mind rather than the spirit. But once they grasp Him, they are a powerful force in the world.
Go well, friend. I hope you see and know more of Him and understand what that means for you and your purpose for the world.
Take everything you just said and ask, who.coded.these.machines?
No pressure right? Lol. You are correct. We have been telling them for years we have the best autists. Just so happens this guy is a patriot. After watching the video I think most judges can understand this. If they can't, after that explanation, they are incompetent or corrupt.
How would any sophisticated financial crime, such as money laundering, ever be prosecuted in court? These are the models we need to emulate in data presentation.
Think of it this way:
No one has proven that God exists. Not one single human being.
Yet, billions of people can say they have felt the touch of God inside them. I'm not talking about having a good feeling about something or finding oneself in a good mood. It is an unexplainable warmth, almost akin to the highest high you can get from the strongest drug, but at the same time, nothing like that. But you know.
And always remember the inverse: no one, not one single human being, has ever proved that God doesn't exist.
Whether you believe or not is immaterial to me. What I believe is that God believes in you, my Pede. I truly hope one day you are able to find yourself feeling his touch. You'll know what I mean. Words can't describe it.
Edit: I want to recommend a film to you, The Mission (1986). Jeremy Irons and Robert DeNiro (before he became an angry, bitter self-loathing cuck). It is not a film to rush through. Give yourself two hours of peace time, and really soak the movie in. It is a life-changer.
We all have our own sensitivity to the spiritual world imo. The other day we had mass for my grandfather's passing. They do it every year on the anniversary of his death. One of the stories that gets told a lot in our family is how delicately he handled his instrument (professional musician). The man would wash his hands before ever handling it. Didn't matter if it was for a show or just to practice. As a family of musicians some kids take to it and others don't. My nephew was probably ~5 years old when he went up to his great grandfather and asked to play his guitar. Everybody in the family looked at each other with complete shock when he said
He eventually started playing his own instrument in elementary and has stuck with it throughout school. One of the things he's known for is being very talented but having trouble dealing with nerves during competitions. At one point he said he was freaking out before recording his song for UIL. He says right before he sat down to play he felt a warmth on his shoulder that completely settled him down and eased his mind. He looked behind him and saw no one. He's convinced his grandfather is still looking out for him to this day. He has so many stories that simply defy logical explanation. Recognizing family members in photographs that had passed away long before his father had even became a teenager. The list goes on and on. The stories my family always told about supernatural things used to be fun as a kid. As I've grown up I've come to see them all in a new light.
i have never seen a genius claiming he is one
“Surely you were made for such a time as this...”
Few will taste the utter transcendent delight of knowing that they are living in the exact purpose God has for them – their entire reason for being – in the way you have just experienced. Even your testimony to it is a powerful tool for Him to awaken others to their purpose. It’s a privilege to witness, and a fan to the flame of my own faith.
God bless you continually, friend. You’ve just done something amazing, in more ways than one!
Amen!
Great job! I remember seeing your first video so I'm glad you're still working on it.
Must be a great feeling. :)
Thx for all your research, pede! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Wow this is genuis-level reverse engineering. I just watched the video as well as the simulation you made. I would really suggest making your presentation for court an explanation of the visual simulation using laymans terms. I was a math major and the only way I could follow the actual full explanation was by stopping a bunch and and sketching out the math and pictures i feel like a judge just wouldn't get it. When I checked out the simulation it was a lot easier to grasp but Really great work. you will go down in history for this
I had to get the video as soon as possible.
The court presentation will be a tidy and polished slideshow.
Can you add to the simulation the scenario where they have to shut down and stuff ballots in? And can you show it predicted this election? I’m just thinking of what laypeople will find most easy to grasp.
The other response to this made me wonder: Can you show what happens if the expected vote and expected ratio are not accounted for after 70% of the votes come in and your scheme has fallen behind? Do they just inject ballots at the same ratios until they catch up?
Do we have all the double voters, out of state, unrequested absentee *(Matt Braynard's work), etc. come in when they try to reconcile the numbers? Or why they are fighting signature matching so hard because they never actually had any envelopes or physical ballots for 1000s of these votes in the first place?
The double voters, unrequested absentee, etc are different frauds orchestrated by different people.
Those frauds are to boost the number of 'actual' Biden votes, this algorithm fraud is to shift votes from Trump to Biden.
They decide beforehand how many votes to switch based on polls. The ratios are not so that Biden 'catches up' they are so that the switches are spread out organically. Due to the ratios for instance all the swapped votes will still pass Benford's test or most other statistical test looking for signs of fraud.
So they set it up to shift 3% of votes, but at 3 AM they've got enough real votes to predict Trump is at +10% of real votes and will win anyway. They can't change the ratios because then it would show up statistically before/after the change. This is when they inject enough new fake votes to cover the difference. This is where the Biden-only votes come in.
If I understood the reference properly, the simple selection of “next precinct” and then rotation back to the top to start again is the most damning piece of data for the non-technical.
Has a well known statistician, data scientist, or forensic auditor agreed with your analysis? It is important to have independent voices. Else you might easily get tripped up by the opposition who might point out flaws in your reasoning chain. You may have the facts, but they will have the arguments. For one, the fact that Fulton etc. have very high Dem votes need to ruled out as a confounding factor. And, so on.
Best of luck to you as you fight for all of us in this country and even the world! I hope you also ask the Judge to put on his big boy pants or patriot pants on. HIGH ENERGY!
I've you've watched this whole video, especially if you're not skilled in math, you've taken the red pill and are far down the rabbit hole. Congratulations, you are an elite member of the Trump Special Forces.
The correct odds of winning his Vegas bet is 1 in 6.079 Billion (adjusting for this 2% => 20% transposition)
Thanks lol <3
I remember the day we couldn't get a hold of you. We were so worried bout you! Hope youre getting some good protection. Godspeed brother ed!
Just checking in to ask if the findings of the machine in Ware County, GA flipping 38 votes during the audit comports with your findings?
https://thedonald.win/p/11QlKUy9qz/bombshell-dropping-with-dominion/c/
I have to be honest, this part of the video left me very concerned about the rest if he thinks this question maps to what he's talking about.
This just literally is the birthday paradox, confused as an argument.
If you choose one person at random, what are the odds that you have the same birthday? 1 in 365.
However, if instead the question is, how many people have to be at a party before the odds are 50:50 that two of them have the same birthday? The answer is 23. If 70 people are at the party, the odds of finding 2 with an identical birthday are 99.9%.
His Vegas question is the first question, but the scenario in the video is actually the latter, and if he doesn't know this, that's concerning.
More succinctly, the odds of choosing one specific number in advance are not even remotely comparable to the odds of finding that some number is a match between entries in a massive dataset.
I think if we wrap the hypotenuse around the tangent and feed it into Godels completeness theorem with a Short-time Fournier transform, we can confidently conclude a 50% chance that Edward is a misunderstood savant and 50% chance he's insane.
I'm only 15 minutes in and not as mathy as I pretend to be. Would it be accurate to say that they shuffled in a specific, artificial vote ratio to different precincts on a rotating basis and you derived the algorithm they used to distribute that ratio? Would it be happening more in Fulton based on them counting last? It being distributed more out of necessity?
Fulton is where most of the ballots could be delivered with local cooperation. There is a physicals mechanism of ballot stuffing involved. Boots on the ground will now go directly to these precincts.
Don't get trapped in this cul de sac. It is not required to have boots on the ground. Looking at the manuals for these machines, they can make an image of a ballot. They don't need an actual ballot (in fact the touch screen machines certainly don't). Continue with your excellent insight about zombie machines, I agree, but a zombie machine can have "Images" of zombie "ballots" that were never there.
When the "recounts" occur, they're happening at centralized locations, so it's trivial then to "make up" those zombie ballots. This is far easier and only requires a few criminals instead of a vast conspiracy. Those thumb drives being passed around probably contain those images, and are sent to printers, which is why observers keep talking about "identical xeroxed looking ballots". They ARE effectively xeroxed. I've already posted a Chinese video with subtitles here of someone ordering ballots to have them air freighted in by courier. They don't need the ballots unless there's a recount which is why you see all the foot dragging and slowdowns at first, then massive chunks all at once.
Again, be careful there be snakes on the other side and they'll try to trip you up with impossibles. Since they already Know what they've done, they'll misdirect you and try to trip you up and make you look foolish. Stick to what you Know don't go down their rabbit hole of speculation. When they ask you in court how you think something was accomplished, answer thus, "Why don't You tell Me, you're working for Them! "
Amazing discovery and great effort was involved in producing this work. THANK YOU, EDWARD SOLOMON !
Also this algorithm doesn't add or remove any votes to the total, so no poll books need to be modified. All the chain of custody that lists number of votes is the same.
To survive a recount all that needs to be done is for locals on the take to be told how many Trump votes to take out and replace with Biden votes. Plenty of time to do that by stalling the recount for weeks.
edit: and this is why they needed a shredder, to dispose of the Trump votes they pulled out of the ballot boxes to make the real votes match the switched votes.
So, with boots on the ground, all one would have to do is go to a specific precinct and do what? Just a recount? Audit? To prove this.
Audit ballots. The Reference sheet has all the precinct names involved (first sheet in the spreadsheet 021Evo file).
You would know where to look and what to expect. The amount of time a precinct is seized and it's normal ratio would determine how many ballots are wrong or fraudulent. You wouldn't hit the number right on the nose if they went outside their average during the time they were seized. Technically, if you wanted to do a limited audit, you would be able to make it look worse than it even is. Just audit those precincts in Fulton county that were seized for a long time. Overall, ~200,000 votes were flipped.
They've had a month during the "recounts" to set everything straight.
Example 2 and the simulation explain it well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes
Has past election data been analyzed to show that this does not normally happen? That would be an effective comparison.
It's been happening since they used these machine.
No comparison is needed. Wheel Numbers and absolute convergences cannot happen in natural data.
So, I know you have proved GA and hopefully this data makes an appearance somewhere. But, could you also apply this to every other state/county that uses these machines then? I know it can be done but I would think raw data would be needed for “proof” and convincing with other states.
He lays out his method for finding it somewhere around 1:15:00 in. With the same type of data, you should be able to find out if this method was used. I would want a qualified person to do it, because you can get false positives at higher numbers and an expert can express their confidence statistically with numbers.
He lays out his method for finding it somewhere around 1:15:00 in. With the same type of data, you should be able to find out if this method was used. I would want a qualified person to do it, because you can get false positives at higher numbers and an expert can express their confidence statistically with numbers.
What would be interesting is an analysis of the ratios on data from ares that DON’T use this system as a demonstration of what is normal ratio occurrence.
Now that I think about it, it all makes sense: if you watch the OP video. The system uses a “natural set” and “flip set” of votes. These two percentages are predefined. Example, of a total of 100,000 votes, the natural set would be 70k (70%) and the “flip set” would be 30k (30%). The natural set are votes not being manipulated. The “flip set” 30k will go through the software “virtual precinct” to be manipulated using certain ratios. On Election Day, the machines didn’t have enough “flip votes” to use for their defined ratios by end of the day to overcome the Trump lead. They couldn’t change the predefined “natural” percentage and So they only had a defined number, percentage, of votes to manipulate. So, by end of Election Day, Trump still had the lead or essentially “broke the algorithm”. So, what do they do? They send everyone home at election counting facility and pull out additional ballots they manufactured to push through the machines. And wow, Biden now leads by just 12k. Weird how that works. Now do we see why all these states all stopped counting on election night?
Great summary
On top of that, because it could effect down ballot, they had to stuff with Biden only ballots, lest it skew everything else.
I think they are doing it by Party and Candidate.
It explains the insane volume of no down vote ballots.
THIS is the explanation that needs to get out! Totally easy to understand.
But shouldn't this indiscretion be caught in hand recounts?
If they have the counts of the fraudulent ballots, they can simply manufacture them and mix them in with the legitimate ballots. They've now had weeks to make sure they have enough to meet the fake numbers.
From Crappydatum below, a good explanation.
Don't get trapped in this cul de sac. It is not required to have boots on the ground. Looking at the manuals for these machines, they can make an image of a ballot. They don't need an actual ballot (in fact the touch screen machines certainly don't). Continue with your excellent insight about zombie machines, I agree, but a zombie machine can have "Images" of zombie "ballots" that were never there. When the "recounts" occur, they're happening at centralized locations, so it's trivial then to "make up" those zombie ballots. This is far easier and only requires a few criminals instead of a vast conspiracy. Those thumb drives being passed around probably contain those images, and are sent to printers, which is why observers keep talking about "identical xeroxed looking ballots". They ARE effectively xeroxed. I've already posted a Chinese video with subtitles here of someone ordering ballots to have them air freighted in by courier. They don't need the ballots unless there's a recount which is why you see all the foot dragging and slowdowns at first, then massive chunks all at once.
So it could be caught in an audit? The fabricated ballots are unlikely to pass signature verification perhaps? Or am I stuck in the cup de sac? It would be nice to have an independent practical confirmation of this algorithm. Not that the mathematics is not compelling if you can grasp it.
Not when they're counting the manufactured ballots along with the valid ones. The hand recount just confirms the machine count. To uncover this we need an audit, not a recount, to identify the fake ballots.
Watch the live simulation video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes
Starcraft used to simulate voter fraud in 2020. What a time to be alive.
If this video appears in the Supreme Court... meme magic is real.
This is excellent. Fellow centipedes, if you only have 20 minutes, watch this one.
I studied a lot of math and physics back in the day and I was a little lost with the main two-hour Bitchute video. This one, though, clicked right away.
That was AWESOME
It has to be a central network, there's no other way to slide the weights.
I think Trump overshot their projections, and they adjusted the software at night. They stopped counting until they got the go-ahead that the new algorithm would make Biden win again. That is why we had massive dumps in the middle of the night, which made the fraud very obvious and statistically observable, and it explains why Biden won the swing states with such tiny margins (3x <0.5%).
Was the ballot dump made because the algorithm wasn’t flipping enough votes to chance the outcome?
precisely
If he is right then the algorithm works to flip a certain percentage, and it's based on their projections. But since Trump overshot their projections in these swing states, they had to stop the counting, update the code, push it out to the Dominion and ES&S machines. The counting is mainly just a cover, the ballot stuffing is to ensure there is some plausible paper trail in case of audit. So they might have though would get 55% and set it up for Biden to beat that, but then Trump got 65%.
If there was a central network you would assume that the NSA and Homeland Security among others were collecting the data in real time.
Yeah but their evidence is illegally gathered, which totally proves in my opinion that the dragnets were only created for clandestine/illegal/nefarious purposes, because if you tried using it for anything exposed to the light then the evidence is illegal and thrown out.
They would keep that info to themselves.
The reference sheet has all the precincts involved by name, so that's where the investigators will go.
It was reported that the machines communicated with an offsite server on the internet before sending data. This would give them the opportunity to "update their cloud"
The coordinated shutdown of multiple states, election night "updates" which should decertify the machines, and the video evidence that data was transferred to a USB and manipulated on a machine connected to the internet should throw flags for any layman.
Thanks for doing this! LFG MATH!
Perfect!
A mathematical calculation is used to distribute a number of votes in a particular precinct, mostly to Biden, then later, the function Transfers to a different random precinct to continue the vote update there. The same calculated Ratio is used when the Transfer is made into the next precinct. (The associated video provides evidence of the scheme and explains each time this transfer happens.) —> This Continues using a set of related Ratios until you have the totals you wanted.
All hail MATH !!
Hey OP, bitchite links throws a 404.
BItchute is still processing. Rumble is done.
https://www.brandnewtube.com/
Nice! I will take your suggestion.
It's beyond evidence. It's proof.
You’re likely going to need another credentialed mathematician to corroborate your findings, due to the nature and complexity (for normies) of the proof.
Even with a clean presentation, the court and observers won’t know if they’re looking at a proof or smoke and mirrors because they won’t comprehend the probabilities implied by your proof. Innumeracy is a bitch.
How can we get more local data at precinct and county levels that shows numbers changing? When a precinct finishes counting is there a record at that level before it's amalgamated at central counting locations?
Would local precincts make phone calls about their results? Etc. etc.
Are there discrepancies between those numbers and numbers on Secretary of State websites?
If we're talking about Fulton county alone, there are specific answers to your questions. If we expand to other counties and states, some answers will depend on the equipment and methods they are using.
The data you're describing would be present in the central tabulation software. However, if I were inclined to perpetrate such a fraud, I'd be intent on not merely changing the counts reporting to the news, but also in the tabulation database (that also becomes the SoS data) and the markings on the ballots. That is why a forensic examination that includes paper mail-in ballots and the QR Code from ballot marking devices vs. the printed choice on the receipts is necessary, in additional to firmware and software validations on the actual machines used, not representative machines that could have different versions.
What are some of those different equipment and methods?
Is there no other alternate data trail besides central tabulation software, besides the central tabulation database?
The Antrim County Michigan people noticed the SoS data was wrong because it was a large 6,000 vote flip that turned the county red to blue. Would they have noticed say a change of 694 ballots for Trump, 396 ballots for Biden changing to 649 ballot for Trump 441 ballots for Biden?
Would they not have a local precinct record of their first count that shows a discrepancy with the final count shown on the SoS website? Or a local county record that shows a discrepancy? Or would local precincts have no clue because their local tabulator equipment flipped ballot images at the local precinct level?
I would think it would have to be the former cases, otherwise data reporting, manipulation on foreign servers, manipulated data reporting wouldn't make sense.
Wouldn't that be all the evidence of fraud you need? Wouldn't that make software logs of manipulated data superfluous?
Equipment vendors https://www.eac.gov/voting-equipment/registered-manufacturers
Methods Hand-marked ballots, BMDs, DREs, DREs w VVPAT, Hand count, Optical Scan https://ballotpedia.org/Voting_methods_and_equipment_by_state
Each State decides how they conduct elections. Again, I think the answers to the rest of your questions vary by state and their level of reliance on third-party software in their processes.
Dr Shiva said that in the state he analysed (Pennsylvania?), the algorithm was race based not alphanumeric. Maybe a different software fraudster person is "assigned" to each state?
Dr Shiva seems to confirm this analysis is correct as his analysis finds a linear algorithm also?
I think the Supreme Court will need a couple of Stanford, MIT professsors or military analysts to confirm it is accurate as this is too complicated for a straight lawyer (with no maths degree) as all SCOTUS justices are (?). (I say this as a law and maths grad.)
Yes which is why the surveillance video was so important. Everything else is just abstract noise.
I agree, in this way: The human mind knows fuckery when it sees it. We are conditioned to know it our entire lives, through all our interactions with people. Some are more gullible than others, but we develop a base level of awareness relevant to our society. Even if we see things that we recognize as fuckery that aren't fuckery, a video image like that is more convincing that something is wrong than any detailed explanation. We trust our eyes more than anything. We are skeptical of explanations.
This example (excel) may help some Pedes : https://ibb.co/0tnffKL
The total number of flipped votes is independent of the size of the flipped precincts.
The only way this can possibly happen is if there is an algorithm that is designed for this and it seems Edward Soloman cracked it! Insane and awesome!
\
I just want to thank you Edward. Good pedes like you give us hope, knowledge and understanding. Sincerely, thank you.
As a coworker told me "Math, not even once."
This is amazing. Needs stickied.
You will need to make this understandable to the average Joe - HAHA Ha Ha Ha
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes
Still needs to be made simpler. I mean I got it...sort of,but let’s just say brainy pedes aren’t the best explainy pedes. And that’s just how the algorithm works...how to explain the Georgia data matches the algorithm...or proves the algorithm was used. 🤷🏼♂️ guess I’ll have to puzzle out the long vid...
I understand you, pede. I hope we get verification that the Dominion servers/machines have this algorithm somewhere. Then we do not have to be vigilant in searching but just push the movement forward. God bless!
I agree, as the data and analysis is very interesting. I do agree with a lot of comments on here that say simplification is critical here.
Having watched the whole video, there were a couple of instances where the poster made an error (like around the smoking gun 1:06 timeframe) and admittedly said he was sleep deprived while presenting. Coupled with the length of the video and complexity of the analysis, will be difficult to digest for many.
But the best way to get simplification is for as many people as possible to see this post and help simplify.
I had heard before of a more simplified algorithm that just counted every biden vote as 1.3 and took the increase over 1 that biden received from trump (if 100 votes split 60/40 trump/biden, algorithm runs and makes it 52/48 biden/trump - 40x1.3=52, 12 increase to biden taken from trump so 60-12=48).
This idea of a virtual precinct and wheel is a more sophisticated and likely far less detectable version of that idea. Overall the presentation was good but it needs to be greatly simplified.
The problem with 1.3 to one is that's a contention with no PROOF. Shiva found the result but couldn't point to specifically where it happened. Furthermore they don't have actual fractional votes, that's just an artifact when you see totals.
u/EdwardSolomon figured out EXACTLY how they were doing it and even found the magic ratio they were using. They wanted a RESULT of 1.3x and they got it by a multi step process. Just like a good embezzler, they used multiple buckets to hide the steal. The Normies think this can't happen when you're watching results in real time, but of course it can and did, until they couldn't win without a LOT of new votes, hence shut everything down and massive vote dumps at 4 AM.
The fact that the used a linear function for the vote differences is embarassing. Absolute amateurs. If they wanted to get away with it, they could have chosen literally any other kind of function, or just superimposed mean-0 random noise on the linear function. Absolute dumbasses.
I’ll bet it’s a limitation of system coordination. Even a non-math type like me knows that if you want to hide fake numbers, you don’t generate them with an easily-regressed function. That’s local accountant level stuff. So, there has to be a reason, and I’ll bet it lies with a non-sophisticated piece of the steal support apparatus.
"There were some dumb lucky mistakes that led these discoveries..." - more like ES is a very stable genius. 😎
I'm not a big math guy. I'm commenting to be a part of history.
Update: Added Layman's version.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N5FShKVjRdk&t=21s
https://rumble.com/vbmho1-laymans-explanation-of-the-wheel..html https://www.bitchute.com/video/Qa9QaZkWXt3H/
Nice job!
https://thedonald.win/p/11QlKSgp33/edward-solomon-shares-laymans-ve/c/
I don't understand any of this
It's not your fault, blame the edumacation indoctrinated into you. You don't think "common core" was designed to make you smarter do you?
Yes, but aren’t you grateful now that no child is left behind...
The fake vote totals were made up in a non-sophisticated way which didn’t stand up to math pede.
God level math pede.
Amazing work. And if we could back-out the multiple ballot scans for Biden....
This needs to be Super-Stickied!
Great work-absolute magic 🍻
I haven't yet heard an explanation for how a recount would not find these incorrectly counted ballots. Georgia uses dominion machines and their recount is done I believe but didn't show much in the way of changed votes after the fact. How would that be done?
I explained this above
In order, the zombie votes go into the system. Normally this is enough, game over you lose by a lot.
In THIS election enough patriots came out for Trump that the algorithm was overwhelmed. That caused two things to happen. First they had to stop the count so they could do the Second part, which was to trigger a higher algorithm percentage. Even then, they Barely had enough votes for Biden.
Now comes the recount. The zombie votes aren't even there so they've got to manufacture those ballots, pronto. Luckily for them, and because they've compromised the election supervisor and director, they get to "recount" in a central location, so they just have to fake that those ballots came from the outlying precincts. The software produces ballot "Images" even for a phony ballot. Print out those images and you've got the "recount" ballot in your hand. It doesn't look right, and it wouldn't survive an audit, but they're banking on the next administration being Biden so all this quickly gets swept under the rug.
So they recount the images not the actual ballots?
yes. If you did signature verification on those ballots they would be blatantly fraudulent
For what it’s worth, you could programmatically create those ballots and generate a signature on them.
Good question, but there was a testimony before the Georgia state legislator that said Dominion was brought in to assist or replace the workers because of COVID 19 outbreak and this team had the capability to print ballots. This testimony was from a employee who was responsible for printing test ballots.
Here is the video of this testimony: https://youtu.be/e35f4pUIYOg?t=8147
Yeah, many affidavits confirming they were counting clean ballots.
A recount is not an audit. A recount is just doing the same exact thing that was done on election night. It's to double check the accuracy of what's there. That's why recounts are usually only a few hundred votes off. The machines haven't changed or been audited since election day so they'll put out the exact same numbers. That's why The President is pushing for a signature check which is an audit. That would throw out illegal votes and find the Dominion fraud.
There's two components to this fraud:
the fractional bucket 'seizing' precincts with different fractions. This is to spread the cheating out so that no individual updates look suspicious, for example it'll produce a perfect Benford's law distribution of first digits (as perfect as possible given precinct sizes) and other tests for fraud.
precincts are only altered by algorithm where local officials are on the take. This only matters for a recount. In safe states there's no recount so nothing has to be done, you just add x% to your guys every election to keep it a safe state. If there's a 'random audit' you just have officials randomly pick from a non-rigged county.
So there aren't any more votes added by the algorithm, which means poll books don't have to be fixed by making the dead vote, no ballot box counts have to be changed, etc. All they have to do after the fact is tell the locals how many Trump votes to pull out of the box and replace with Biden votes. This is the easiest way to physically rig because all the audit trails will show the right number of votes and there's plenty of time before a recount to arrange this.
From what I understand this dude has essentially found the "golden ratio" used by dominion and basically reverse engineered all the precincts to identify where the ratio is used and can tell the true vote by reversing the ratio.
Also, I'm guessing he has mathematical proof that the ration cannot occur so many times unless it was specifically used to alter the votes otherwise all the ratios between the candidates votes are way more random. Kinda sloppy on dominion's side to use the same ratio and not randomise it more but kinda expected I guess.
This whole thing is great and someone should get it to Dr Shiva as this correlates quite well to what Shiva was talking about. This is also great as this can help identify which precincts had true votes and which were manipulated.
Some amazing reverse engineering work right here!!!
They actually used different ratios for each precinct— but they were all “perfect” (integer) ratios, and all added together, resulted in the one golden ratio of manipulated vs untouched ballots. But your explanation is a good summary.
One way it could tie in with Shiva's video is the limitations of states that keep track of straight and split tickets. Some of the virtual precincts are Trump-heavy to be able to keep a balance to the target instead of just dumping everything on one end of the scale. If the algorithm started flipping straight tickets then local dems will lose proportionally massive numbers of votes. It probably grabs from the split tickets first, or possibly even instructs a discard of a number of straight republican ballots while virtually creating split tickets to replace them. Shredder trucks and audit delays anyone? That would crash the Trump results in split tickets even more so than would otherwise happen.
If the same ratios (and golden ratio) are in even a single other state that would be the real smoking gun in my mind
Is there a "for dummies" summary of this? Biden should be ~200,000 votes lower?
Yes. Biden's total should be exactly 200,343 votes lower.
The 200k number really caught my eye, because a few weeks ago I went back and read threads from different sites and compiled numbers from reports (news/sos) overnight in GA
At midnight Trumps lead was 329,000 At 1 am Trump’s lead was still +6 with 86% precincts in.
Between midnight and 1:30am Trump’s lead dropped 115,008 with 88% in.
Between 1:30am and 1:49 Trump’s lead dropped another 107,182 with 99% in +2.5 lead 16 precincts left in Fulton County.
(He maintained an approximately 120,000 lead with 100% precincts reporting the next morning. Then the SOS dropped the bombshell that 200k absentee votes were left to be counted.)
I also compared that with the chart that someone did using the Edison data and it showed spikes after the GOP watchers were kicked out, which also showed a 200+ vote gain for Biden.
Do you know where I can find the timestamped data by precinct for every county in PA?
The PA precinct data is fucked. The NYT json files only have the precinct data for a portion of the counties, and you have to be careful on Chester and Philadelphia counties.
Ref precinct_by_vote_type and precinct_totals: https://i.maga.host/fl7gLDf.png
Ref ProcessPAPrecinctData(): https://github.com/StopTheSteal/StopTheSteal/blob/main/Analytics/Scripts/python/ConvertToCSV.py
Also: https://thedonald.win/p/11QRov5EwD/timeseries-precinct-data-files-f/sort=new
I don’t, but I know someone on TD had a lot of PA data...
A question... how do we know these ratios aren’t the result of fake printed ballots that were run through the machines over and over? Either way it is bad, but I just wonder if every cheating precinct was given stacks consisting of 9:1 Biden to Trump ballots that were fed through 5, 6, 7 times
Am I getting this right?
The total altered votes in all the hijacked precincts was 287,424 total votes. Biden was given 242,434 Biden of those. That's 84.3%.
For the non-hijacked votes in those precincts, Biden got 76.4%.
So wouldn't we have to assume that he would have gotten a similar number of the votes in hijacked precincts if the algorithm hadn't been run? E.g., 76.4% of 287,424 = 219,592. That's would mean the algorithm netted him an estimated 22,842 votes more than he would have gotten (assuming the 76.4% would have applied to those vote counts). That's still enough to overcome Biden's ~12k lead.
Or are all of these hijacked votes added on top of what would have come in naturally?
I'm convinced all the hijacked votes were ballots that would never have been cast, they were either manufactured behorehand or blank.
Worst case scenario is your result, at 22,842.
Thanks for the reply Edward. I forget to mention that even in that worst case scenario, Trump would get those stolen votes, giving Trump a lead of around 34,000 votes, almost triple Biden's current margin.
p.s. Great work. And God bless.
Once you get the ballots past the initial observing room, there's nothing you can really do
The reason they don't want to perform a signature verification is because they couldn't fake the envelopes and the signatures.
In which state?
GA only, but this analysis could and should be done everywhere.
now this is just counting flips, not fraudulent ballots, right?
Yes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes
Geometric proof of concept is the perfect approach to explaining this.
Democrats have defied the laws of geometry.
Geometric proofs were how the Greeks used to do it before that guy al gebra. I figured you just switched it over to illustrate for the visual learners because algebra is gobbledygook to us foolish mortals.
what laws have they not defied...
well of course, mathematics is RACISS
So you can use this theorem and figure all this out because they had more exact percentages that are unlikely to be the ratio of any real numerator and denominator? In other tables for other states they have less exact percentages that are apparently cached and reconciled for edison data so the mechanism might be indistinguishable from the method. They could either skim or just obfuscate against what you are doing here. I'm kind of talking out of my ass, but this is how I figure things out.
The percentages were the clues not the answer. There's a path to get there, the first step on the path is to look at the oddities, which show up in odd percentages. Since there aren't "partial" votes there had to be a way to do this with integers (whole numbers). Solomon figured out that way, then documented it.
That was my understanding as well, the biggest part of the smoking gun. As numerators and denominators get larger and larger, the chances that a fraction will reduce to where top and bottom are both whole numbers under 100 gets less and less likely. Yet in the vote data those ratios are all over the place, and repeated, way beyond what would occur naturally.
Can we help summarize the findings into simple explanation for laypersons? It must be distilled down to the simplest terms at the start in order for this to be viral.
My best summary so far is “the algorithm switched people’s votes (or switched stuffed fake ballots) to perfect ratios distributed over a randomized set of precincts to hide the trail and make it harder to audit (so no one precinct has a huge obvious discrepancy), resulting in the total number of votes needed for Biden to be reached after all precincts are “counted”The proof is because we see the exact same ratio of votes in several precincts at once over many days and they all change coordinated together, proving that the votes at these precincts were being manipulated by an algorithm to give the required total votes when all added up.”
There is no way that the same perfect ratio of Biden and Trump voters voted at the exact same times in many precincts AND all changed to new perfect ratios at the exact same time. And there’s no way these perfect ratios all added up to giving Biden the exact lead he needed to win.
https://thedonald.win/p/11QlFnBcjV/x/c/4DpMy374Mze
I’m only about knee deep into this so far but I want to grasp this before I actually go further so I don’t set myself up for an illusion of bias: How do changes occur when we say “all changed to new perfect ratios at the exact same time”? What do we mean by changes occurring? This is new values being reported for the same “variable” but what changed the value? More votes being counted in a specific precinct or are they only reporting aggregate values and then distributing them out to simulate the lower values? Or do we know for sure that the true lower values were being reported?
He sorted the precincts by ratio of Trump to total votes (removes 3rd party variable), and found that multiple precincts had the same ratios, and then they all switched (transferred) that ratio to new precincts at the exact same time. So the algorithm was cycling the required ratios through different precincts.
Right but what I don’t understand is how the time series data is created in the first place, what causes a numbers to change within the time series data, is it the way the time series data is produced over time that causes this illusion or are we convinced that the time series data at the precinct level are the actual numbers at every given point in time? See what I mean? If the data was reported at a high level and saved into a data set by dividing them out into chunks to simulate the lower levels, then it would create an arbitrary distribution even though they weren’t the true lower level numbers right? Just trying to verify that, iron sharpens iron!
Good point. But shouldn’t each precinct report their numbers independently (they shouldn’t be connected to a network), so how do multiple precincts have the same coordinated ratios and changes? If they weren’t connected I don’t know how they could be part of a bigger chunk like you’re saying.
That’s exactly what I’m trying to figure out but without knowing how the data was generated I can’t be sure.
BUT since I haven’t seen more than the Starcraft video I still have some more to digest before I could come up with a theory on what an alternate explanation would be.
This is the type of revelation that in a movie would be followed by a montage of the cavalry coming in, kicking in doors and all of the Dominion employees getting perp walked. My fear is that the swamp is so deep and wide that it may only remove the scum on the surface. They'll designate a few bad actors from each city like Ruby and her Daughter from Fulton county and they'll blame the entire plot on them.
Nice 1 Patriot!!!!!
Yeah my brain is on the verge of exploding-lets get this info out there.
This genius was not taught using the common core math method.
Sticky. Great work, watching now.
We definitely need some "explainers" - like Prager U - to help out with this.
There's no way normies can understand this.
Newt Gingrich is an amazing explainer. Could be someone to get this to as well.
THANK YOU EDWARD!!!
Thanks for this!
You know, this is probably how the map turned purple while in reality it should be all red.
Do you have timestamp per precinct data for other states?
Yeah I found it. I did not know it's possible to get timestamped precinct updates from NYT feed. Now I see it is.
https://git.maga.host/stunnashades/edison/-/tree/main/
This guy is either a genius of a complete idiot. I'm too dumb know which it is.
Patriot! Better get rid of these machines all together. They are a creation of Satan. Without the machines the fraud would become more humane so that everyone could understand it and trace it with real-world ballot papers. I take it that this smart math that was implemented by Smartmatic is replacing real ballots. Very dangerous to the future of real Democracy!
God bless you and the United States.
The simulation really helped me understand. Thx.
Hey man. In case you have any trouble posting your stuff on websites I have reuploaded your video over here:
https://video.maga.host/videos/watch/acffe0d0-120c-495c-b8b5-0329a8a52f9d
It does mention your name as well as the original upload location the video was taken from. God bless you and your work. God bless POTUS. God bless America! God bless patriots all over the world.
Democrats can't even cheat well.
This is amazing. Well played sir.
My brain hurts just reading this.... I ... I can't get it.. I can't follow it... I need more content on some of these points.
WAY TO GO Edward Solomon!
Wow.