Either way memes "Crossing the Rubicon" above and others, is a backwards/inverted meme for today.
Strategic Redpill:
DJT is daring the Dems/Corrupt/Commies to cross the Rubicon and into his perfectly laid trap, with fortified walls and artilery emplacements, and sharks with lazers. If the Dems wade their army across the Rubicon, they will be caught in the trap without anyway out.
One thing about DJT, is he plays the long game, he plays for ALL the chips on the table.
In theory, like poker/card games; the Dems/commies could fold their hands, get up from the table, and take their remaining chips with them. Except because of all their crimes committed, billions spent, trillions at stake, etc. the Dems globalist, commie, organized crime overlords wont let them get up from the table. Their overlords will drive their whips and force the Dems into the Rubicon.
The Dems cannot stop losing. We cannot stop winning! Keep spreading the WIN&WIN Plan to more Republicans, especially State Legislatures.
Our Founders were very wise, and they knew and read all the old books describing such things as Julius Caesar and the Rubicon; the history of the Republic and the starting of the Empire, along with much else.
Julius Caesar's crossing the Rubicon river on January 10, 49 BC [1] precipitated the Roman Civil War, which ultimately led to Caesar's becoming dictator and the rise of the imperial era of Rome.
DJT/Pence/us we are defending the REPUBLIC; and DJT is already head of the Republic. So the historical analogy would be more like fighting the barbarians who are going to cross the Rubicon and their path towards trying to sack Rome. Or in defending Athens or Constantinople from fallling.
We are fighting to HOLD THE LINE to LONG LIVE OUR REPUBLIC! We are not fighting to end our Republic and start a dictatorial Empire or Leftie Commietopia. The Lefties, The Democrac Party, are the ones who been intentionally working for generations now at eroding our Republic, our Constitution, our Election Integrity. Democrats want a Democracy not a Republic, and Lefties want to then turn that democracy into a Commietopia.
Democrats and commies and criminals are pushing for Civil War 2.0 for awhile now. I warned of this years ago on TDspezdit, and laid out everything we needed to do to head them off. We are here in the here and now. The Lefties are the ones who want/need to raise the water temp to boil in order to spread marxism here there and everywhere, as well as war/civil war is part of their greatest transfer of wealth in human history. We can still stop them.
Also about J. Caesar, he was like Pinochete or Franco; even if the pretense of why they did a coup is "good"; them holding onto power and destroying their Republic/gov into a dictatorship, loses them sainthood in the history books. This is why then and now, George Washington stands shoulders above them.
Read my WIN&WIN spam link, it has the list of 25 things Dems have done to intentionally erode our Election Integrity on the front end of elections.
We do not want to end the Republic and make an Empire, which then splits into West & East, which then falls to barbarians, mercenaries & kultural enrichers.
Historical REDPILL:
There have been more powerful Empires in world history than the Roman one, #1 easily being the British Empire before 1776.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH WE STAND, IS THE GREATEST COUNTRY IN ALL THE HISTORY OF THE EARTH. AND WE MEAN TO KEEP IT THAT WAY, BOTH A REPUBLIC & THE GREATEST.
Democrats are being driven forward by the whips & coin of their globalists, global commie kin, & criminal cartel boss, slave masters. They need no encouragement from us.
We need to buck up the courage of normies (including most State Legislatures whom are mostly normal people believe it or not). One thing normies fear, is a dictator/emperor; and if you ask them are they more fearful of a Trump dictatorship or a Biden one; they see Biden as weaksauce, so would rather annoint him and the imperial concubine.
These Memes do not help as cool as they are. Showing the hordes pilled upon the walls trying to storm the castle/Republic with Lady Liberty inside, and the zerglings/barbarians/commies/kulturalEnrichers/etc. outside trying to steal their way in would be much better!! There's a reason why the Propaganda during things like WW1 and WW2 was so effective (even if it was marxists getting Patriots to go off and fight against and for marxism) it was stll effective of courage building for normies.
The OATH to uphold the US Constitution is key! The US Constitution as written! Not as bluepills have said it is written.
Ehh, a LOT of Pedes here are cool with Dictator Donald. As a Trump-supporting libertarian, it kinda makes me feel politically homeless. Guess I'll just watch and pray for any other outcome.
You should read a book called "Democracy: The God That Failed." It's a really fascinating book. It's written by a professor at the University of Nevada (a bastion of academic excellence? LOL). But he is essentially a Libertarian monarchist.
That sounds bizarre, but if you read his argument, it is essentially that under traditional monarchies, there is no centralized state that wields all power over citizens. People actually enjoyed more freedom under Louis XVI than under the Directorate that followed in the French Revolution. Modern republics/democracies are more intrusive and more restrictive than any monarchy ever was.
The point is basically have a monarch and forget about pretend republics with voting that is essentially a popularity contest. Preserve and enshrine individual freedom and property rights. Focus on that rather than "political freedom" which is fake and illusory.
I forget if he mentioned the case of the UAE, but this is essentially a model. The Emirs have all the power in the UAE. There are no elections. But the people are given absolute personal freedom, at least in Dubai and Abu Dhabi, and the economy is free market capitalism. It's one of the most successful countries on earth with this model.
Definitely check it out. The paperback version is expensive, but worth it. I bought a used copy. You can also find it online via torrents but that is of course illegal and up to you whether you think it's morally permissible.
Also about J. Caesar, he was like Pinochete or Franco; even if the pretense of why they did a coup is "good"; them holding onto power and destroying their Republic/gov into a dictatorship
I don’t see how you can say that, considering they murdered J. Caesar just when he was getting started.
And the ones who murdered him were the Roman equivalent of “swamp creatures”.
The lesson learned is, even if by thinking he was "saving the Republic"; his actions (like a Teddy Roosevelt and the Bull Moose Party) were exactly what the swamp creatures needed/plotted to put the dominos in motion to finish off the Republic. The OTHER course of action was J. Caesar could have without crossing the Rubicon, worked to restore the structural deletions which weakened the Checks and Balances of the Republic, that had broaught it to it's weakened internal state.
Like we have militas in the US Constitution; but 100 years ago, they got usurped into the National Guard.
Like we Senators whom are supposed to represent their States; but got usurped to direct Election by popular vote.
Like we have congress with power over coinage; but got usurped by The FED.
Like we have military troop structure & equiping & promotions; but we got open Marxists at West Point & open Commies in the Pentagon; we got Navy Ships which catch fire and not even in combat; we got fighter jets which cant fly without software reboots or engine rebuilds every few days; we got foreign kultural enricher soldiers training in our bases shooting our soldiers; etc.
The list is quiet long in some of my other comments; but seriously; strengthing our REPUBLIC and restore the things which make it strong as a government, with checks and balances; rule of law; Oaths of Office enforced; etc.
I fully believe the term limit on a presidency is working in favour of swamp creatures.
In fact I think it was their idea, especially since it happened after that socialist bastard Roosevelt had 4. And the fact there are no limits on more minor positions.
Trump will only have another 4 years, and like weeds in a garden, they shall inevitably regrow.
His life and actions single handedly forged the next 2,000 years of human history. An argument could be made that Gaius Julius Caesar was the most influential man to ever live.
I love Julius Caesar, but I believe his grandnephew (and adopted son) Augustus was the greatest man that ever lived, after Jesus.
Augustus kept many Republican institutions intact, even though he ruled as an Emperor. He essentially did not lord it over the people, but kept them engaged in civic life and didn't flaunt his power, but ruled modestly and by consensus.
If the choice is Emperor Trump or terrorism under BLM/Antifa on lists that sitting Democrat representatives have openly called for, Pinochet is preferred. To be clear, I'd rather have Trump Caesar now than Pol Pot in 10 years. They have called for packing SCOTUS, adding states to secure the senate and bringing in millions of immigrants to ensure permanent control. Along with this they openly believe we should be taxed to pay for slavery and civil rights issues that happened before we were born.
Lincoln imprisoned many, including media, and we did not end up with Nero or Caligula. Crossing the Rubicon to me is Trump declaring martial law and rounding up all of the traitors who are trying to cheat the elections. What else is the NSA for if not for something like this?
Crossing the Rubicon to me is Trump declaring martial law
See this is what I mean, it's 180degree backwards. The redpill is Dem Covid Governors & mayors have been declaring illegal martial laws for 9 months now.
Using mindsets and phraseology that makes it seem like (or is a good idea) Republicans or DJT is "putting kids in cages/rounding X groups up..." is pure bluepill commie psy-ops, carrying their water. Real justice doesn't need thus route to bring lawbreakers into arrest.
I am curious why you care what their propaganda organs say. They are cheating without apology. We could play the "real justice" game when they would play by the rules. Any AG run by them only charges us with crimes. Any FBI agent run by them looks the other way for them but comes down like a ton of bricks on us.
There have been more powerful Empires in world history than the Roman one, #1 easily being the British Empire before 1776.
This is absolutely not true at all. The British empire was very modest. The Roman empire was the most powerful in history by far.
The only reasonable metric to use is the relative power of an empire in the world. At the high of the Roman empire, there wasn't a single civilization that could even come close.
The British, while they had more land, they simply claimed an enormous amount of meaningless and uninhabited land, like Canada or Australia, but the British still had to contend with power rivals, including the French that were right in their backyard.
By contrast, the Romans took down every single powerful civilization that was known to European people at the time. The Romans conquered the whole world that was known at the time, in the parts that were strategically important. The British couldn't conquer the land at the other side of the Channel. The British didn't defeat one single powerful civilization. They just took claims on inhabited land. Comparing the two is ridiculous.
The Romans defeating the Carthaginian, their main rivals across the sea, would have been the equivalent of the British invading France.
Britain did own parts of "France", see the 100 years war, etc. Now what's more valuable, British territory in France or North America and India and many spice/run/sugar islands? It's different choices for the times; Rome is cool and all, dont get me wrong.
As an example, like Rome didn't have an economic or political need to "conquer" the Sahara or to the Indus Valley and into India; or head all the way to Mongolia or Moscow or even hold the Caucasus. The military war promotion and money system, made the campaigns into Gaul/Germania plenty busy; along with suppressing internal revolts/etc.
And from a seapower persepctive, Britain sure beat Carthage more than a few times in destroying the fleets of France, Spain, etc. many times over, more than the reverse (yes Britain did have some bad loses too, but that's like Hannibal marching around Italy for a few years.)
In all the world history, every nation, country, empire, kindom, etc runs up against some other territory/tribe/nation which it doesn't conquer or peacefully co-exist with.
Rome had it's neighbors, be it on Britania/Ireland; viking lands; Germania; to the north; or others to the South & East.
Every historical entity runs up against a "limit" in communication and other things across it's territory which limit it's size; including internal structure of how it's government is formed/run.
Example: Mexico today, it's Constitution was written and adopted during the Mexican Civil War just over 100 years ago; and it wasn't agreed to by all parties; and when you read it, you'll see why Mexico can't "rule" over it's entire country any better today, than it could in 1917. It's Constitution isn't a "national" Constitution the way ours in the USA is. It's more like a "State" Constitution. So if the northern 2/3rds of Mexico joined the USA; then finallly the Mexican government from Mexico City, could likely finally have Law & Order upon the remaining State sized territory/population.
In all the world history, every nation, country, empire, kindom, etc runs up against some other territory/tribe/nation which it doesn't conquer or peacefully co-exist with.
Yes, but therefore we can estimate the share of global world power that an empire has at its time. The Romans has a much, much bigger share of world power than the British. See the chart I posted in my previous comment. Simply put
You can't seriously argue that dominating the Mediterranean sea, which was the birthplace of human civilization with lots of powerful empires contending it, is the same thing as going off to the other side of the world and planting a flag in a huge deserted wasteland.
I’m already at home? I don’t get it
Your home is America, they are trying to take it down a dark path.
Raise your shield, nimble navigator, and protect Lady Liberty!
Awesome! Mine says SLICKUS WILLUS!
Biggus Dickus!
Waterus Frogis Gayus
CAVEAT DROPPUS BEARUS
Bimbus Dickinus
My shield says, “Jennus Ellis Enormous Libertas Moundus”.
GEOTUS, must do it, no mercy please!
Do NOT give them chance to destroy your family and America without any mercy.
Fight in the shade!
Exactly Us Patriots are already HOME! These Rubicon memes are historically 180 degrees backwards!!!
PepeFarms remembers Historical Redpill:
The correct historical expression by Ceasar was (likely) ""Let the die be cast!", or "Let the game be ventured!".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_die_is_cast
Either way memes "Crossing the Rubicon" above and others, is a backwards/inverted meme for today.
Strategic Redpill:
DJT is daring the Dems/Corrupt/Commies to cross the Rubicon and into his perfectly laid trap, with fortified walls and artilery emplacements, and sharks with lazers. If the Dems wade their army across the Rubicon, they will be caught in the trap without anyway out.
One thing about DJT, is he plays the long game, he plays for ALL the chips on the table.
In theory, like poker/card games; the Dems/commies could fold their hands, get up from the table, and take their remaining chips with them. Except because of all their crimes committed, billions spent, trillions at stake, etc. the Dems globalist, commie, organized crime overlords wont let them get up from the table. Their overlords will drive their whips and force the Dems into the Rubicon.
The Dems cannot stop losing. We cannot stop winning! Keep spreading the WIN&WIN Plan to more Republicans, especially State Legislatures.
WIN&WIN PLAN! Keep it going Pedes. SEND IT ALONG!
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8EhtERu/for-everyone-who-wants-djtpence-/
Get Republican State Legislatures to appoint their DJT/Pence Electors!
Very simple, type document required by the State Legislatures:
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8EhtERu/x/c/4DpMxkNWgL3
9 Days!!
... History Julius Caesar vs Now:
Our Founders were very wise, and they knew and read all the old books describing such things as Julius Caesar and the Rubicon; the history of the Republic and the starting of the Empire, along with much else.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossing_the_Rubicon
DJT/Pence/us we are defending the REPUBLIC; and DJT is already head of the Republic. So the historical analogy would be more like fighting the barbarians who are going to cross the Rubicon and their path towards trying to sack Rome. Or in defending Athens or Constantinople from fallling.
We are fighting to HOLD THE LINE to LONG LIVE OUR REPUBLIC! We are not fighting to end our Republic and start a dictatorial Empire or Leftie Commietopia. The Lefties, The Democrac Party, are the ones who been intentionally working for generations now at eroding our Republic, our Constitution, our Election Integrity. Democrats want a Democracy not a Republic, and Lefties want to then turn that democracy into a Commietopia.
Democrats and commies and criminals are pushing for Civil War 2.0 for awhile now. I warned of this years ago on TDspezdit, and laid out everything we needed to do to head them off. We are here in the here and now. The Lefties are the ones who want/need to raise the water temp to boil in order to spread marxism here there and everywhere, as well as war/civil war is part of their greatest transfer of wealth in human history. We can still stop them.
Also about J. Caesar, he was like Pinochete or Franco; even if the pretense of why they did a coup is "good"; them holding onto power and destroying their Republic/gov into a dictatorship, loses them sainthood in the history books. This is why then and now, George Washington stands shoulders above them.
Read my WIN&WIN spam link, it has the list of 25 things Dems have done to intentionally erode our Election Integrity on the front end of elections.
We do not want to end the Republic and make an Empire, which then splits into West & East, which then falls to barbarians, mercenaries & kultural enrichers.
Historical REDPILL:
There have been more powerful Empires in world history than the Roman one, #1 easily being the British Empire before 1776.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH WE STAND, IS THE GREATEST COUNTRY IN ALL THE HISTORY OF THE EARTH. AND WE MEAN TO KEEP IT THAT WAY, BOTH A REPUBLIC & THE GREATEST.
MAGA! MAGA = REPUBLICAN = FOR OUR REPUBLIC!
I'm actually pretty chill with Emperor Trump. Yep definitely.
Problem with good emperors is that eventually they die...and you could get a very bad emperor ;)
We want Trump to pull a Lincoln. That's all.
Democrats are being driven forward by the whips & coin of their globalists, global commie kin, & criminal cartel boss, slave masters. They need no encouragement from us.
We need to buck up the courage of normies (including most State Legislatures whom are mostly normal people believe it or not). One thing normies fear, is a dictator/emperor; and if you ask them are they more fearful of a Trump dictatorship or a Biden one; they see Biden as weaksauce, so would rather annoint him and the imperial concubine.
These Memes do not help as cool as they are. Showing the hordes pilled upon the walls trying to storm the castle/Republic with Lady Liberty inside, and the zerglings/barbarians/commies/kulturalEnrichers/etc. outside trying to steal their way in would be much better!! There's a reason why the Propaganda during things like WW1 and WW2 was so effective (even if it was marxists getting Patriots to go off and fight against and for marxism) it was stll effective of courage building for normies.
The OATH to uphold the US Constitution is key! The US Constitution as written! Not as bluepills have said it is written.
Ehh, a LOT of Pedes here are cool with Dictator Donald. As a Trump-supporting libertarian, it kinda makes me feel politically homeless. Guess I'll just watch and pray for any other outcome.
You should read a book called "Democracy: The God That Failed." It's a really fascinating book. It's written by a professor at the University of Nevada (a bastion of academic excellence? LOL). But he is essentially a Libertarian monarchist.
That sounds bizarre, but if you read his argument, it is essentially that under traditional monarchies, there is no centralized state that wields all power over citizens. People actually enjoyed more freedom under Louis XVI than under the Directorate that followed in the French Revolution. Modern republics/democracies are more intrusive and more restrictive than any monarchy ever was.
The point is basically have a monarch and forget about pretend republics with voting that is essentially a popularity contest. Preserve and enshrine individual freedom and property rights. Focus on that rather than "political freedom" which is fake and illusory.
I forget if he mentioned the case of the UAE, but this is essentially a model. The Emirs have all the power in the UAE. There are no elections. But the people are given absolute personal freedom, at least in Dubai and Abu Dhabi, and the economy is free market capitalism. It's one of the most successful countries on earth with this model.
Definitely check it out. The paperback version is expensive, but worth it. I bought a used copy. You can also find it online via torrents but that is of course illegal and up to you whether you think it's morally permissible.
IF he were dictator it wouldn't even matter. The guy is getting close to 80. Let him have a few more terms lol.
I don’t see how you can say that, considering they murdered J. Caesar just when he was getting started.
And the ones who murdered him were the Roman equivalent of “swamp creatures”.
To the victors goes the typewritters of history.
The lesson learned is, even if by thinking he was "saving the Republic"; his actions (like a Teddy Roosevelt and the Bull Moose Party) were exactly what the swamp creatures needed/plotted to put the dominos in motion to finish off the Republic. The OTHER course of action was J. Caesar could have without crossing the Rubicon, worked to restore the structural deletions which weakened the Checks and Balances of the Republic, that had broaught it to it's weakened internal state.
Like we have militas in the US Constitution; but 100 years ago, they got usurped into the National Guard.
Like we Senators whom are supposed to represent their States; but got usurped to direct Election by popular vote.
Like we have congress with power over coinage; but got usurped by The FED.
Like we have military troop structure & equiping & promotions; but we got open Marxists at West Point & open Commies in the Pentagon; we got Navy Ships which catch fire and not even in combat; we got fighter jets which cant fly without software reboots or engine rebuilds every few days; we got foreign kultural enricher soldiers training in our bases shooting our soldiers; etc.
The list is quiet long in some of my other comments; but seriously; strengthing our REPUBLIC and restore the things which make it strong as a government, with checks and balances; rule of law; Oaths of Office enforced; etc.
spez Redpill Reading:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crisis_of_the_Roman_Republic
I fully believe the term limit on a presidency is working in favour of swamp creatures.
In fact I think it was their idea, especially since it happened after that socialist bastard Roosevelt had 4. And the fact there are no limits on more minor positions.
Trump will only have another 4 years, and like weeds in a garden, they shall inevitably regrow.
Julius Ceasar is the greatest man that ever lived. (Obviously excluding Jesus)
His life and actions single handedly forged the next 2,000 years of human history. An argument could be made that Gaius Julius Caesar was the most influential man to ever live.
I love Julius Caesar, but I believe his grandnephew (and adopted son) Augustus was the greatest man that ever lived, after Jesus.
Augustus kept many Republican institutions intact, even though he ruled as an Emperor. He essentially did not lord it over the people, but kept them engaged in civic life and didn't flaunt his power, but ruled modestly and by consensus.
If the choice is Emperor Trump or terrorism under BLM/Antifa on lists that sitting Democrat representatives have openly called for, Pinochet is preferred. To be clear, I'd rather have Trump Caesar now than Pol Pot in 10 years. They have called for packing SCOTUS, adding states to secure the senate and bringing in millions of immigrants to ensure permanent control. Along with this they openly believe we should be taxed to pay for slavery and civil rights issues that happened before we were born.
Lincoln imprisoned many, including media, and we did not end up with Nero or Caligula. Crossing the Rubicon to me is Trump declaring martial law and rounding up all of the traitors who are trying to cheat the elections. What else is the NSA for if not for something like this?
See this is what I mean, it's 180degree backwards. The redpill is Dem Covid Governors & mayors have been declaring illegal martial laws for 9 months now.
Using mindsets and phraseology that makes it seem like (or is a good idea) Republicans or DJT is "putting kids in cages/rounding X groups up..." is pure bluepill commie psy-ops, carrying their water. Real justice doesn't need thus route to bring lawbreakers into arrest.
I am curious why you care what their propaganda organs say. They are cheating without apology. We could play the "real justice" game when they would play by the rules. Any AG run by them only charges us with crimes. Any FBI agent run by them looks the other way for them but comes down like a ton of bricks on us.
FOR THE REPUBLIC!
LONG LIVE OUR REPUBLIC!!
This is absolutely not true at all. The British empire was very modest. The Roman empire was the most powerful in history by far.
The only reasonable metric to use is the relative power of an empire in the world. At the high of the Roman empire, there wasn't a single civilization that could even come close. The British, while they had more land, they simply claimed an enormous amount of meaningless and uninhabited land, like Canada or Australia, but the British still had to contend with power rivals, including the French that were right in their backyard.
By contrast, the Romans took down every single powerful civilization that was known to European people at the time. The Romans conquered the whole world that was known at the time, in the parts that were strategically important. The British couldn't conquer the land at the other side of the Channel. The British didn't defeat one single powerful civilization. They just took claims on inhabited land. Comparing the two is ridiculous.
The Romans defeating the Carthaginian, their main rivals across the sea, would have been the equivalent of the British invading France.
Here is a super interesting chart that shows the relative power of each empire in world history. Pure gold for those who like history
I really LOVE that chart thanks for the link pede.
Britain did own parts of "France", see the 100 years war, etc. Now what's more valuable, British territory in France or North America and India and many spice/run/sugar islands? It's different choices for the times; Rome is cool and all, dont get me wrong.
As an example, like Rome didn't have an economic or political need to "conquer" the Sahara or to the Indus Valley and into India; or head all the way to Mongolia or Moscow or even hold the Caucasus. The military war promotion and money system, made the campaigns into Gaul/Germania plenty busy; along with suppressing internal revolts/etc.
And from a seapower persepctive, Britain sure beat Carthage more than a few times in destroying the fleets of France, Spain, etc. many times over, more than the reverse (yes Britain did have some bad loses too, but that's like Hannibal marching around Italy for a few years.)
In all the world history, every nation, country, empire, kindom, etc runs up against some other territory/tribe/nation which it doesn't conquer or peacefully co-exist with.
Rome had it's neighbors, be it on Britania/Ireland; viking lands; Germania; to the north; or others to the South & East.
Every historical entity runs up against a "limit" in communication and other things across it's territory which limit it's size; including internal structure of how it's government is formed/run.
Example: Mexico today, it's Constitution was written and adopted during the Mexican Civil War just over 100 years ago; and it wasn't agreed to by all parties; and when you read it, you'll see why Mexico can't "rule" over it's entire country any better today, than it could in 1917. It's Constitution isn't a "national" Constitution the way ours in the USA is. It's more like a "State" Constitution. So if the northern 2/3rds of Mexico joined the USA; then finallly the Mexican government from Mexico City, could likely finally have Law & Order upon the remaining State sized territory/population.
Yes, but therefore we can estimate the share of global world power that an empire has at its time. The Romans has a much, much bigger share of world power than the British. See the chart I posted in my previous comment. Simply put
You can't seriously argue that dominating the Mediterranean sea, which was the birthplace of human civilization with lots of powerful empires contending it, is the same thing as going off to the other side of the world and planting a flag in a huge deserted wasteland.
if your homeland is overtaken by commies, then are you really home at all?
Day of the whipper snipper when?