They speak with a forked tongue, vaccines will not be mandatory, BUT you must have proof of vaccination to live an ordinary life....
Orwellian double-speak:
He said:
What may be mandatory is proof of…vaccination in order to have latitude and freedom to move around…without wearing other types of personal protective equipment,” he added.
Williams also suggested that people would be prevented from entering certain settings without having been vaccinated if there was a “risk.”.......
As we previously highlighted, governments do not have to make the vaccine mandatory, they can simply make life unlivable for people who refuse to take the vaccine.
This type of government overreach will drive people to just get the coof and develop their own antibodies with blackjack and hookers, instead of accepting their stupid hamfisted vaccine policy.
It's not that they are unreliable, it just depends on what you are looking for.
It is my understanding that they are looking for virus RNA, but the method allows recognition of RNA from all coronavirus types, not just this particular "dangerous" strain. The PCR test should be done in conjunction with another test, and I believe they actually do it (testing for antibodies). So if done properly, the PCR test would narrow down the tested subject pool for the slower and more expensive test, and after getting a negative result on both a person would be declared virus free.
Now I think that all the decision makers would rather take the risk of a false positive, telling a healthy person to stay isolated, rather than allowing a potentially sick person to mingle with others and spread the virus.
Another important factor is that PCR tests can be done easily, quickly, in great numbers, and almost every laboratory has such an instrument. Having a perfect test that only a handful of people can perform, in just a few labs across the world would not be able to keep up with the amount of tests that need to be performed. That's why this type of testing was chosen. Something of a compromise, considering the realities of our world.
A quote by General Patton comes to mind that describes this approach quite well: "A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week."
Problem is that down the line there's a lot of human factor involved, and it includes lack of knowledge, lack of professionalism, outright incompetence, and in the end you get people relying on numbers and statistics more than on real life. Plus, any government being slow to adapt, and almost always hamfisted with its response.
They speak with a forked tongue, vaccines will not be mandatory, BUT you must have proof of vaccination to live an ordinary life....
Orwellian double-speak:
He said: What may be mandatory is proof of…vaccination in order to have latitude and freedom to move around…without wearing other types of personal protective equipment,” he added.
Williams also suggested that people would be prevented from entering certain settings without having been vaccinated if there was a “risk.”.......
As we previously highlighted, governments do not have to make the vaccine mandatory, they can simply make life unlivable for people who refuse to take the vaccine.
This type of government overreach will drive people to just get the coof and develop their own antibodies with blackjack and hookers, instead of accepting their stupid hamfisted vaccine policy.
The PCR tests are massively unreliable, I'm hearing that they are 97% unreliable.
so even healthly people will flag up as positive.
By design, to fake a non existent "virus"
It's this year's regular flu variant with heavy badge engineering.
It's not that they are unreliable, it just depends on what you are looking for.
It is my understanding that they are looking for virus RNA, but the method allows recognition of RNA from all coronavirus types, not just this particular "dangerous" strain. The PCR test should be done in conjunction with another test, and I believe they actually do it (testing for antibodies). So if done properly, the PCR test would narrow down the tested subject pool for the slower and more expensive test, and after getting a negative result on both a person would be declared virus free.
Now I think that all the decision makers would rather take the risk of a false positive, telling a healthy person to stay isolated, rather than allowing a potentially sick person to mingle with others and spread the virus.
Another important factor is that PCR tests can be done easily, quickly, in great numbers, and almost every laboratory has such an instrument. Having a perfect test that only a handful of people can perform, in just a few labs across the world would not be able to keep up with the amount of tests that need to be performed. That's why this type of testing was chosen. Something of a compromise, considering the realities of our world.
A quote by General Patton comes to mind that describes this approach quite well: "A good plan violently executed now is better than a perfect plan executed next week."
Problem is that down the line there's a lot of human factor involved, and it includes lack of knowledge, lack of professionalism, outright incompetence, and in the end you get people relying on numbers and statistics more than on real life. Plus, any government being slow to adapt, and almost always hamfisted with its response.
Sterilization vaccine
yes it is one of the components of this fraud.
TYRANNY
The same rules will not apply to the political class.
creating a class of untouchables. Put Your Mask On, Leper!