You've just uncovered the actual operating principle of Hollywood. Sleeping with the right A-list producer could very possibly get you $20 million or more over your career.
It is not worth it though, as if the Hollywood trainwrecks weren't obvious enough.
Lmao idk if that's serious or not, but myself and this nomoremasks person had quite a back and forth on my post about this tweet from Ron. Quite entertaining I will say.
sure was. trolled her a bit in a few of her threads when she started braggin about her journalistic achievements. just lower a females sexual market value by telling them no one likes old women and they rage.
Can someone explain the context as to why he would send that last message? I don't quite get it & feel like it could be something that undermines credibility.
More to the point, it was an unreasonable request. Do you not think "hello sir, would you like to respond to accusations that you beat women?" is an unreasonable request?
Someone else might be able to explain it better than me, but I think it's originally from /pol/.
When a female anon posts on /pol/ and claims that her opinion on a certain matter carries more weight because she is a woman, anons 'ask for proof' that she is a woman.
I might not have explained that fully or accurately, so if anyone wants to correct me, please feel free to clarify.
It's more than that. On a forum like 4chan, nobody can really tell if you're male or female and because of that, right or wrong, most people assume the person they're talking to is male. When a person chooses to "identify" as female on an "anonymous" board like 4chan, they are either trolling or a thot thirsty for attention (both of which they get from simps that derail the thread to hat tip m'lady). "Tits" or "Tits or GTFO" is a very elegant solution to that problem. If it's a troll, they can't provide and if it's a thot they post pics and the simps literally can't post because theyr'e actually masturbating. It's also a subtle way of telling someone that their gender is irrelevant to any conversation they might have with someone. Thank you for listening to my TedX on taiwanese pictogram forum game theory.
Oh no, we must be really really worried about whether the vicious left considers us credible. /s Have you learned so little from GEOTUS after all these years? Please #BeBetter. Free yourself from caring about the opinion of liars and manipulators who HATE you.
We need to dig up Churchill's remains and clone him.
For 20 million I'd sleep with you too!
NGL I would give up my virgin booty hole too!
$10 million is nothing to dismiss, and you can buy a lot of therapy for $10 M.
*Kamala has entered the chat
You've just uncovered the actual operating principle of Hollywood. Sleeping with the right A-list producer could very possibly get you $20 million or more over your career.
It is not worth it though, as if the Hollywood trainwrecks weren't obvious enough.
she was on this board later and opened several threads insulting ron. Her name was "nomoremasks"
CYKA BLYAT
Oh really? Wild.
Was going to say, prob not that hard to figure out who that was.
Lmao idk if that's serious or not, but myself and this nomoremasks person had quite a back and forth on my post about this tweet from Ron. Quite entertaining I will say.
sure was. trolled her a bit in a few of her threads when she started braggin about her journalistic achievements. just lower a females sexual market value by telling them no one likes old women and they rage.
๐๐๐
2020: The Legend of Ron
I think I'm going to start saying this in real life. It really is incredible how effective it is.
Propoganditties
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes
๐
4chan
And 8 chan and 8 kun.
KEK
Love this guy. Would buy him whiskey.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA
Spoiler Alert!
"She" is really a dude with hairy nipples!
(Yeah I know some sickos like that sort of shit)
this is the best thing i've seen today
Damn based af
Wtf lol
LOL
So rude
Yeah, she didn't even show a aereola or anything! I agree
topkek
Based. These "journalists" among the lowest lifeforms around
Wow lol
ONE OF US! ONE OF US!
A clear case of tits for tat.
I canโt survive without this place lol
Should hit her for defamation..
This guyโs definitely on the Chanโs
Not really based, thats dumb as fuck. What he did was solicit her and it's illegal if she wanted to do something about it.
Can someone explain the context as to why he would send that last message? I don't quite get it & feel like it could be something that undermines credibility.
Shes not a journalist. Shes a dumb hoe and should be treated as such
Roger that
More to the point, it was an unreasonable request. Do you not think "hello sir, would you like to respond to accusations that you beat women?" is an unreasonable request?
arent they all "journalists"dumb whores?
Nah man, I was literally asking a question and voicing a concern. We still have a PR war to fight, since normies are still in the dark.
Someone else might be able to explain it better than me, but I think it's originally from /pol/.
When a female anon posts on /pol/ and claims that her opinion on a certain matter carries more weight because she is a woman, anons 'ask for proof' that she is a woman.
I might not have explained that fully or accurately, so if anyone wants to correct me, please feel free to clarify.
It's more than that. On a forum like 4chan, nobody can really tell if you're male or female and because of that, right or wrong, most people assume the person they're talking to is male. When a person chooses to "identify" as female on an "anonymous" board like 4chan, they are either trolling or a thot thirsty for attention (both of which they get from simps that derail the thread to hat tip m'lady). "Tits" or "Tits or GTFO" is a very elegant solution to that problem. If it's a troll, they can't provide and if it's a thot they post pics and the simps literally can't post because theyr'e actually masturbating. It's also a subtle way of telling someone that their gender is irrelevant to any conversation they might have with someone. Thank you for listening to my TedX on taiwanese pictogram forum game theory.
That's the bit I was trying to explain, but I suspected there was more to it than that, so thanks for expanding.
Oh no, we must be really really worried about whether the vicious left considers us credible. /s Have you learned so little from GEOTUS after all these years? Please #BeBetter. Free yourself from caring about the opinion of liars and manipulators who HATE you.
Don't care about the left. I am considering the normie view on things though. We still have to win the PR war