Can someone explain the context as to why he would send that last message? I don't quite get it & feel like it could be something that undermines credibility.
More to the point, it was an unreasonable request. Do you not think "hello sir, would you like to respond to accusations that you beat women?" is an unreasonable request?
Someone else might be able to explain it better than me, but I think it's originally from /pol/.
When a female anon posts on /pol/ and claims that her opinion on a certain matter carries more weight because she is a woman, anons 'ask for proof' that she is a woman.
I might not have explained that fully or accurately, so if anyone wants to correct me, please feel free to clarify.
It's more than that. On a forum like 4chan, nobody can really tell if you're male or female and because of that, right or wrong, most people assume the person they're talking to is male. When a person chooses to "identify" as female on an "anonymous" board like 4chan, they are either trolling or a thot thirsty for attention (both of which they get from simps that derail the thread to hat tip m'lady). "Tits" or "Tits or GTFO" is a very elegant solution to that problem. If it's a troll, they can't provide and if it's a thot they post pics and the simps literally can't post because theyr'e actually masturbating. It's also a subtle way of telling someone that their gender is irrelevant to any conversation they might have with someone. Thank you for listening to my TedX on taiwanese pictogram forum game theory.
Oh no, we must be really really worried about whether the vicious left considers us credible. /s Have you learned so little from GEOTUS after all these years? Please #BeBetter. Free yourself from caring about the opinion of liars and manipulators who HATE you.
Can someone explain the context as to why he would send that last message? I don't quite get it & feel like it could be something that undermines credibility.
Shes not a journalist. Shes a dumb hoe and should be treated as such
Roger that
More to the point, it was an unreasonable request. Do you not think "hello sir, would you like to respond to accusations that you beat women?" is an unreasonable request?
arent they all "journalists"dumb whores?
Nah man, I was literally asking a question and voicing a concern. We still have a PR war to fight, since normies are still in the dark.
Someone else might be able to explain it better than me, but I think it's originally from /pol/.
When a female anon posts on /pol/ and claims that her opinion on a certain matter carries more weight because she is a woman, anons 'ask for proof' that she is a woman.
I might not have explained that fully or accurately, so if anyone wants to correct me, please feel free to clarify.
It's more than that. On a forum like 4chan, nobody can really tell if you're male or female and because of that, right or wrong, most people assume the person they're talking to is male. When a person chooses to "identify" as female on an "anonymous" board like 4chan, they are either trolling or a thot thirsty for attention (both of which they get from simps that derail the thread to hat tip m'lady). "Tits" or "Tits or GTFO" is a very elegant solution to that problem. If it's a troll, they can't provide and if it's a thot they post pics and the simps literally can't post because theyr'e actually masturbating. It's also a subtle way of telling someone that their gender is irrelevant to any conversation they might have with someone. Thank you for listening to my TedX on taiwanese pictogram forum game theory.
That's the bit I was trying to explain, but I suspected there was more to it than that, so thanks for expanding.
Oh no, we must be really really worried about whether the vicious left considers us credible. /s Have you learned so little from GEOTUS after all these years? Please #BeBetter. Free yourself from caring about the opinion of liars and manipulators who HATE you.
Don't care about the left. I am considering the normie view on things though. We still have to win the PR war