229
posted ago by ViolentNPCS ago by ViolentNPCS +229 / -0

Been working insurance, specifically auto, for around a year and a half.

Looking at the pictures of the GA staffer/Kemp Daughter's BF vehicle...

Generally speaking, even after a bad accident, vehicles don't burn out like that. 70mph rollovers don't burn out like that. Where I work, if a vehicle is a "total burn", that claim immediately gets routed to a senior handler, and an investigation is performed.

The likelihood of a total burn being the result of an intentional act is so high, there's almost an assumption of that being the case, that someone is likely lighting that vehicle on fire in order to commit insurance fraud. Do you get what I'm saying?

In my professional estimation, THIS WAS THE RESULT OF AN INTENTIONAL ACT. I'M ALLEGING MURDER.

In addition, it happening so quickly after Kemp the Cunt agreed to allow signature verification only adds weight to my allegation, and assumptions.

Comments (29)
sorted by:
12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
11
TEXinLA 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yup.

Only in the Biz do vehicles explode.

Anyone seen a manufacturer/model/make on the vehicles involved?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
TEXinLA 3 points ago +3 / -0

No issues with fuel tanks noted for models after 2010.

Gasoline is actually not that flammable; fumes are much more so.

I have had a number of collector vehicles that had had carburetor/fuel line issues. None burned despite gas spewing from a broken jet on one carburetor and another with fuel spilling from fuel line.

And one was rear ended on the freeway by an inattentive driver. The crash ruptured the just filled fuel tank. No fire, lots of lovely premium gas all over the lanes.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
TEXinLA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup. Generally takes a while for a car to catch on fire. Now that I think about it, I witnessed this when I was a kid. Our family had a Ford Galaxie that was an absolute lemon.

Drive through a puddle, the alternator would get wet and the car would stop. It would vaper lock for no reason. The car ate starters and was tough to crank. If it got hot, it would sput and buck and just might stop. Cold? Same thing.

Don't know what caused it to start smoldering under the hood one day (Mom's prayers?) but my Mother had just pulled out of the driveway. She saw the smoke, pulled over and parked in front of the next door neighbors' house.

After popping the hood, small flames were over various parts of the engine. Might have been a faulty fuel line. The fire department came after about 15 minutes and by that time, all the wiring had been burned, installation, plug wires, plugs, anything else in the engine compartment, topside.

Did not reach the gas tank or anything else; one fireman told my mother it would never run again.

After working on it after work, my Father had it running in two days.

9
MastaJoda 9 points ago +9 / -0

Having witnessed countless VBIEDs (Vehicle born IEDs)...this vehicle in the front looks to have been loaded down with explosives/accelerants of some type. Trains smashing cars leaves them in better condition than that crumpled up and completely demolished heap of scraps. I’m guessing it wasn’t cut with jaws of life considering the thing had 50 ft flames shooting out the top, and no one was getting recused from it? That would be the only excuse for that car to be shredded and look as if it had been exploded from the inside. Just my 2 cents...

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
8
Morpheus75 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yup, but proving it is gonna be hard. Pretty sure the evidence is gone by now. No evidence again.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
7
redditiscucked 7 points ago +7 / -0

Do we know any of the other people involved in the crash?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
7
SaintMicheal 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'm a paramedic of 20 years, of the hundreds of wrecks I've been to I think maybe 2 or 3 have burned like that.

Very sus.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
Chuckwagon642000 6 points ago +6 / -0

Domestic Terrorism. Wheres Barr?

5
slaphappy2 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's bad for us - because we are the good-two-shoes side that always acts lawfully and ethically.

The Democrats/socialists get what they want because they are willing to lie, cheat, steal, rob, make death threats and .... murder.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
jamrs 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can someone post pictures

1
RallyinStJohnsWood 1 point ago +1 / -0

figure 350# for 4 cylinder engine (not just the block; cams, pistons, rods, crank, manifolds, accessories, etc) and transmission together; they are pretty tightly integrated mechanically I doubt they would separate. Probably more like 400 or 450 # for a 6 cylinder/tranny

If the engine went mostly straight up, the force required depends on how high it got. If the engine flew straight forward, the hulk of the car would have been pushed in the opposite direction with equal force. If the car stayed in one spot, the engine went straight up and the force applied was directly below the engine.

Find out who towed the car, where it went. It's probably been shredded already (like the hard drives from the voting machines). But if you can get pictures of it, get pictures of the engine bay at least. you never know what images will turn out to be useful so take as many pix as possible.

Scrape the thing for residue all over, put samples in plastic bags marked with location on the car. 

 another vid:https://www.wsav.com/video/fiery-3-vehicle-crash-on-interstate-16/6090996/ couldn't see the semi truck well , a car was there that looked rear ended, and another vehicle (SUV?) was a mass of twisted metal.Doesn't look like any wreck I've ever seen. 

 local news video: https://www.wsav.com/video/loeffler-campaign-staffer-dies-in-i-16-crash/6090010/  find out who else was in the crash, see if they make any statements/wind up dead for any reason soon.I bet the truck driver and the occupants of the other car got a story to tell.

So sad. COVID claims another young life. 

 https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse2.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIF.%252fLZdSuVOJuGhMXMy5s12hA%26pid%3DApi&f=1

one car utterly destroyed all over but not bashed in at the front or rear or side - just completely torn apart; the roof is gone one car rear ended, and a popped hood.cant see much of the truck cab, just a door

rear ended car was in front of Deal, truck was behind. Boom, explosion tears up the rear of the car in front of Deal, his vehicle slides around in front of the truck which jackknifes trying to stop / steer away from the wreck in front of him.

Anybody see it different ? 

 aerial of the scene: https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse2.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIF.MIQ4LruQZBJ3kBVaE%252b6wKw%26pid%3DApi&f=1

4
Illuminaughtie 4 points ago +4 / -0

time to meet fire with fire

4
Shaffro 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think an auto would need to plummet off a cliff and hit rocks below and would it even explode like that one?

1
ViolentNPCS [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope. I've taken that claim.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
CovfefeVideo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Kemp has unhappy, ruthless benefactors. Change my mind.

3
SeF1 3 points ago +3 / -0

How about the fact the engine block was ejected 200 yards away? Bomb?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
RallyinStJohnsWood 1 point ago +1 / -0

to destroy his daughter mentally, which would make an impression on Kemp: "see? we could have easily done this to young cupcake there."