Comments (41)
sorted by:
7
BorisWave 7 points ago +7 / -0

Question everything.

And remember, history is written by the victors.

3
MaxItout 3 points ago +4 / -1

So BOTH the NAZI and the Communist are LEFT wing. -Both wanted State control -Both believed in social distribution -Both wanted Central planning

The Basic difference is the Nazi thought the STATE should control Business and the COMMIES think everyone should equally own the business and should work as a collective

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
MaxItout 1 point ago +1 / -0

LETS BE CLEAR the Nazi way and the Communist's way DO NOT WORK. Central planning ALWAYS breaks down. And Communist believe that at first the state only needs to take control of the business before handing it over to the people in a natural progression. THAT NEVER HAPPENS...

3
ExposeThem 3 points ago +3 / -0

watch "A Rich Man's Trick". The full version is 3+ hours but it is super duper accurate and goes from The Great Wars through 9/11 and the war on terror.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
MsQleo 3 points ago +6 / -3

it may not be, but be careful here people, he may be looking for statements in support of the nazi's or hitler on this site to make a hit piece.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Bonles 2 points ago +3 / -1

I do know 6 million Jews were killed. I do know that Hitler practiced a cult alike religion. I know Churchill was not positive they'd win. Probably wouldn't have until we were bombed by the Japanese which pulled us into the whole mess. My dad was a naval officer which dealt with the Japanese part. I know Bob Dole (a former Sen.) was severely injured in Italy that Germany held. Many, many men died. That's all. Hope that helps.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
choaxondyk 1 point ago +1 / -0

National Socialist German Workers' Party (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei or NSDAP), was a political party in Germany that was active between 1920 and 1945, that created and supported the ideology of Nazism. Its precursor, the German Workers' Party (Deutsche Arbeiterpartei; DAP), existed from 1919 to 1920. The Nazi Party emerged from the German nationalist, racist and populist Freikorps paramilitary culture, which fought against the communist uprisings in post-World War I Germany.The party was created to draw workers away from communism and into völkisch nationalism. Initially, Nazi political strategy focused on anti-big business, anti-bourgeois, and anti-capitalist rhetoric. [wikipedia, edited for accuracy]

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Apersonofinterest 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was the sequel to WW2.

1
ThoughtfulThrowaway 1 point ago +2 / -1

The Nazi were a far-right fascist party, they were fighting the communists who were the far-left party. Antifa originated in Germany, which is the party the Nazi's fought.

Crossroads has a good video on why the communists have flourished in the US: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GI6OyCsOYCM

2
MaxItout 2 points ago +2 / -0

Incorrect... they are on the left. Social programs.

1
boreal_storm 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, the Nazis were "National Socialists." That was their name.

Their propaganda was clearly socialist. There were other parties that constituted the right wing in Germany.

1
Izaritos 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've been looking deeply into WWII lately. Don't look at just one side of the story, especially if you are looking for a non-biased take. I've been reading some books and watching videos on it that many many people will ignore simply because they have a different take. I can send you some links if you like to some of the things I've been watching/reading. DM me if you are interested. WWII is much more interesting than what we are told for sure.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Izaritos 1 point ago +1 / -0

I stumbled across it at first but ultimately that is why I'm still looking into it and am happy to share with others. Can't talk about it to much people but it's very interesting.

1
TrumpWonByAlot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rothschilds/Illuminati wanted to create a new kind of liberal jewish race (less religious) in Israel but they couldn't get any jews to move from Europe. Labor zionism was theorized which had similar ideology as the national socialist party. In an attempt to move the jews out of Europe rothschilds made a deal to fund hitler who was from Austria. He would persecute more religious jews and this would cause the liberal jews to migrate to Israel creating the "new" jew. Rothschilds were sabbatean frankists (basically satanist pedophiles) and hated religious jews. Concentration camps were slave labor camps in rural areas. I've heard that concentration camps weren't originally for the purpose of murdering the jews but for labor and that Germany lacked the infrastructure (socialism) to maintain a constant supply of food and proper living conditions. At some point Rothschilds lost control of Hitler who went of the deep end as too many jews were dying from disease and starvation due to abysmal living conditions. Rothschilds then started the funding for a World War 2. Rothschilds wanted 2 million "new" jews to come to Israel but it ended up being around 800,000. I believe Hitler was scum along with the whole Nazi party but the money behinds the scenes is just as bad. This take is considered by society as anti-semitic for denying the holocaust. I have nothing against jews and don't deny the holocaust happened but the reason for it happening isn't what is taught

1
TheAnomalousUser 1 point ago +2 / -1

I believe that Hitler was Authoritarian Right, while Stalin was Authoritarian Left. Authoritarians tend to take over all aspects of life, as you said. I think Trump falls under the "Libertarian right" of the political scale while people like AOC are libertarian left (Misguided Communists). People like Bernie Sanders, Joe Biden and George Soros are the farthest left you can go on the Authoritarian side of the scale, however.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
TheAnomalousUser 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah that's true. idk why I said that

1
gnostic357 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hitler couldn't compete with the numbers killed by Mao and Stalin. But there's a reason you don't hear about how many millions were killed by Communists.

Just consider this. Patton said we fought the wrong enemy. Hitler just wanted back what was stolen from Germany. Communists want global domination.

If Hitler got the German part of Austria and Poland without interference, he'd have been done. (He sent an ambassador to the UK to stop the hostilities, and had a peace agreement with Russia. We had nothing at stake over there, but Churchill convinced Roosevelt to get us in the war, so we allowed Pearl Harbor to happen although we had advanced notice and could've prevented it.)

Communists, on the other hand, are almost done taking over America.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
gnostic357 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was Russia who broke it.

"With the Polish army being routed by the advancing Germans in the west, Stalin cleverly decides to break the Soviet-Polish Non Aggression Pact of 1932. Poland is stabbed in the back as Soviet forces pour in from the east. The advancing Reds carry out massacres, the most infamous being the Katyn Forest Massacre in which 10,000 Polish Army officers are shot in the head.

Other than the pre-Versailles German areas which Germany will reclaim, the Soviets will take.all of Poland. In a shocking double-standard, the anti-German Globo-Zio press, FDR, France & the UK remain oddly silent about this brutal Soviet aggression."

1
gnostic357 1 point ago +1 / -0

Excerpt from The Bad War:

The “free city” of Danzig is 95% German. Along with its surrounding German area of East Prussia, Danzig was isolated from the German mainland by the harsh post-World War I treaties. Formerly German territory now belongs to Poland, cutting right through the Prussian/Pomeranian region of Germany. As had been the case with Germans stranded in Czechoslovakia, the Germans in Poland (those not expelled in 1919) are a persecuted minority.

Hitler tries to solve the problem of the "Polish Corridor” peacefully. He proposes that the people living in Danzig, and the “corridor” be permitted to vote in a referendum to decide their status. If the region returns to German sovereignty, Poland will be given a 1 mile wide path, running through Germany to the Baltic Sea so that it would not be landlocked.

The Poles consider Hitler’s solution, but behind the scenes, Poland is urged by FDR to not make any deals with Germany. When it becomes apparent to Hitler that Poland will not allow a referendum, he then proposes another solution – international control of the formerly German regions. This sensible offer is also ignored. The Globalists intend to use foolish Poland as the match which ignites World War II.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
gnostic357 2 points ago +2 / -0

Very much so. Globalism is not new. They started on the path toward a world government with the League of Nations after WWI. Later, that was resurrected as the United Nations.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
gnostic357 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's evidence. A clerk snuck out documents that showed FDR knew what was coming, but he was caught, arrested, and held until the end of the war.

Also:

Much new light has been shed on Pearl Harbor through the recent work of Robert B. Stinnett, a World War II Navy veteran. Stinnett has obtained numerous relevant documents through the Freedom of Information Act. In Day of Deceit: The Truth about FDR and Pearl Harbor (2000), the book so brusquely dismissed by director Bruckheimer, Stinnett reveals that Roosevelt’s plan to provoke Japan began with a memorandum from Lieutenant Commander Arthur H. McCollum, head of the Far East desk of the Office of Naval Intelligence. The memorandum advocated eight actions predicted to lead Japan into attacking the United States. McCollum wrote: “If by these means Japan could be led to commit an overt act of war, so much the better.” FDR enacted all eight of McCollum’s provocative steps — and more.

https://thenewamerican.com/pearl-harbor-hawaii-was-surprised-fdr-was-not/

1
KarlLanzer 1 point ago +1 / -0

You need to get the most trustworthy books you can and look at historical documents yourself (you might have to visit a library!). Scrutinize the credibility and bias of your sources and then draw conclusions. Fact: nobody you know personally has ever done this, and the people who have done this do not get published.

Oh yeah, and Hitler was not the opposite of the left. People have a tendency to try to view things as polar opposites or to view them as having a two-sided nature. This is false, and intentionally perpetuated by communists/socialists (no difference in my mind). They would have you believe that the political spectrum has Hitler and Stalin at opposite ends with our system in the middle somewhere. This is entirely false.

-1
Biden_Is_Sus -1 points ago +2 / -3

Phishing for antisemitic comments much?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
TheAnomalousUser 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe, maybe not. Being careful is good, but don't jump to conclusions

-1
rcstl -1 points ago +2 / -3

The USA, Britain and Russia "won!" They wrote the books.

Outside the political leanings, all the leaders in that time were related. Except Roosevelt and Stalin. I see the writings of 1st Infantry and the counter-arguments and I have to wonder how much rounding is involved.

Just like my wonderings about Flat Earth, Lunar landings, and Building Seven. We'll probably never really know.