Barnes: A court ordered statistically significant sample of Arizona's mail in ballots found 11% of the accepted ballots did NOT match according to the Democrats' own expert.
(twitter.com)
🛑 STOP THE STEAL 🛑
posted ago by krepoisbest
+7130 / -0
THIS needs a sticky.
Numerous Twitter replies express doubt anything will be done.
Citizens expressing doubt about their justice and law enforcement agencies after widespread and despicable crimes during an important event. I've not seen that before in my life time.
They must not be hooked up to War Room & TDW
I’m going to start DMing the based ones the link
Be careful with this one.. The very next paragraph says everything else matched up, and did not seem faked or forged. They were just off enough to question but probably would accepted as votes.
Translation of last paragraph from Legalese to English:
The court believes that the ballots they looked at were not tampered with or abused. There is corresponding information to follow up on each of the ballots and contact the person who is listed there. Despite the fact that between 6-11% of them do not match signatures with what is on file, it does not appear someone else signed them (how the court can say this when the experts on both sides say otherwise is uh... interesting). The experts from both sides appear to have done their job correctly and in an unbiased manner.
Typical Federal judge - just ignore the record slapping you in your face to reach your desired result.
Communist Judge logic: You should have sued earlier. But if you sued earlier If dismiss you and tell you to waot for injury to occur.
And if injury did occur, it was insufficient to warrant your action, you can only sue after death.
Bingo.
But it sounds like this is from the Democrat witness. An actual audit could turn up more.
Agreed, I was just putting this out there because of the two threads on this subject, they make it seem as though this is 100% proof of fraud, when in actuality it has not been proven. No need to start spreading this as fact, and look stupid, when more time is possibly is needed to find the truth.
Fraud or not. Trump wins in a fair and transparent audit.
I know, right?
Yet when I go to the lottery commission with the winning ticket, and everything matches and looks legit (except the number on the ticket) they still refuse to pay out.
-- The signature is the only thing that matters. The name and address of voters is public record and the signature is how we make sure that the voter is the same person who registered and showed ID to confirm who they are.
I’m guessing that they didn’t ask the actual ‘voter’ who’s name was forged if they actually submitted a ballot
What fucking second paragraph?
There was another thread with this exact info and a photo of the page from the documents from the court. The paragraph talking about what they found was second from the bottom, and the last paragraph on the page basically stated what the poster said below.
The tweet doesn't have a second paragraph.
Like I said... there was another post on this very subject, made by a different person, who included the picture of the document.
Ya that sounds a lot like "that was deboonked!"
I mean did the CIA or FBI anything about the fraud OR did they wasted millions on racebaiting noose hoaxes?
Dude that's a movie trope. No one is getting into the FBI unless you are complete loser and government stooge. No one with a modicum of individual independent thought has gotten in since the 80s. The FBI is basically just the extortion arm of the corporate oligarchy. They are in no way interested in doing anything to help the average citizen, if it appears that way, such as entrapping extremely low IQ "terrorists" its simply a step for career advancement.
If there is a civil war it wouldn't be the right vs left, there is no real left, it would be the right vs the bureaucracy. There is no large citizen contingent of leftist. The Democrats are the party of the bureaucracy and that bureaucracy is self serving and believes it is above the law.
Very well said
Folks express doubts that anything will be done because that's what they've been seeing consistently these past years. Not only has the justice department turned a blind eye, but the FBI has been actively involved in covering up the crimes of the elite.
I'm the last one to scream "shills," but if I was part of the cheat, I'd be hiring all the fake twitter posters / bits I could to post exactly this.
Doubt is good friend. Doubt drives polls.
Is this different than the other thing they were looking at with the 2500 ballots?
Also, what does this result in? Them taking the ballots off Biden's total?
Yeah...that was duplication and they never looked at 2500 like ordered and stopped at 1600
Is this the one you’re referring to? https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-lawsuits-arizona-elections-phoenix-b4b79038c51ece4078eb2f6bcd326a21
We need the legislatures to see this stuff and take action
I see what you did there.
That's great and all... But where can I get some damn bait?
Totally revenant
I Watched the dam video , what is the relevance of it? im confused
They have seen plenty of evidence to take action already, yet they don't, they always back down. I hate to be a doomer but the legislatures aren't going to do their job it seems.
Lower courts always get cold feet
We need WILLING legislatures to help out. None of these "DEBOOONKED" morons who refuse to accept the facts. All we literally need is people with common sense who will acknowledge what is the truth yet they refuse to do so.
What exactly didn't match, the signatures?
Yes, signatures. It's obvious from the context.
Not really, it could have meant submitted ballots were not from actual registered or eligible voters.
Exactly. Real voters have signatures. No match means that the signature doesn't match, because the wrong person filled it out. It could also mean the person has terrible handwriting.
Yup
But that's the rule with mail-in... In the states like WA and OR where they have done mail-in only for decades... You are told when you register that your signature on registration will have to match or it won't be counted. That's the only way it works.
Not verifying is not following the laws, and guarantees FRAUD will get through.
Bad handwriting isn't a valid excuse... They just have to match their own bad handwriting signature on the registration.
I live in WA. While that may be theoretically true, I don't think they look at signatures much, if at all. I've change my signature significantly more than once since registering to vote and they always accept my ballot.
because the election in WA is a fraud. if we did a signature and voter audit, we would find that WA is majority conservative republican.
the democrats have been stealing elections here for years
I have another theory, there may be a lot of dims, but they dont take any accountabilty, never had. So they don't vote, they think that others will just vote and they dont have too. There might be a lot of dims but not a lot vote
Sounds like you guys need a new voting system. They been F-ing you guys for years
Yup ever since Gregoire v Rossi recount fiasco. Every time they did a recount (there were five recounts) new ballots "magically" appeared. In the state Supreme Court the democrat appointed judges said, "OK you've proven there was fraud, Now show us which EXACT ballots were fraudulent".
The Democrat Party has increasingly become the lawless party. They don't prosecute illegal activity, and they don't even arrest. This attitude and liberal culture is fun--until there's an election.
Yeah correct my signature is scribble and looks like shit but its me so its the same shit scribble every time.
Signature match isn't about whether somebody has sloppy handwriting. It's about the same signature on multiple ballots. No signature. A random signature like 'Mickey Mouse'. This isn't like the guys in Pawn Stars trying to verify the signature of Abe Lincoln or some shizz.
Don’t be a Dick he’s just asking questions. Pedes like to have a full understanding before spewing info. We aren’t blue haired faggots
lol then why require a signature
Could have also been duplicate transfer. Like not marking Trump or giving it to Biden like the AZ 100 sample the other day.
They have to match the absentee ballot signature against the signature on file in poll book
There's nothing in the tweet about signatures.
Ballots that "don't match" refers to signatures and whether the signature matches the one that is on file.
Or a box of ballots with vote totals that don't match the contents of the box.
Not necessarily. In the initial test of 100 ballots the votes had been miscounted.
One Trump vote was not counted as all and one Vote was counted for Biden (a 2 vote swing) for a total impact of 3 votes (-2 for Trump and +1 for Biden).
Those ballots are duplicate ballots which are not necessarily the same as mail in ballots.
Cool.... Link to report? Not the Twitter thread
This is 30 mins old. Everybody is waiting for Barnes to clarify / give source.
yeah i am tired of sourceless tweets, I can't repost this shit to meme anyone
I haven't known Barnes to just blow smoke up anyone's ass.
In this case, that's exactly what he's doing. Read the document that he neglected to include with his tweet, but which does appear in the other tweet linked in this thread https://mobile.twitter.com/thatjerkme/status/1335352622996467714
Plaintiff's forensic document examiner found 6 signatures that were "inconclusive". Defendant's forensic document examiner found 11 signatures that were inconclusive "mostly because there were insufficient specimens to which to compare them." Neither examiner found any sign of forgery or simulation.
The simple fact is that signature matching cannot be done in any meaningful way by election workers processing ballot envelopes, and certainly not on the scale that was required with the huge increase in absentee/"mail-in" ballots. Even professional document examiners, with plenty of time to pore over just a few examples, can't conclusively determine whether the signatures are actually made by the same person whose signature is on voter registration records.
The whole concept of absentee voting needs to be abolished, and this is only one reason. There is never any way to know who actually made the candidate choices, or whether they were made under duress. There is no guarantee that a voter who wanted their choices to be secret was free to refuse to show their completed ballot to someone who has some power or control over them. Who cares if the signature matches? Even if the signature was actually that of the registered voter, there's no guarantee that candidate choices selected on the ballot were the ones the voter wanted.
6/100 and 11/100. Not 1 you misstyped.
Thanks, I just fixed the typo :)
https://twitter.com/thatjerkme/status/1335352622996467714
Because judges are ruling that fraud is constitutionaly protected... And
They know we wont do a damn thing about it
Actually verifying a signature match is extremely difficult, and certainly not something random election workers processing ballots can do. Even these professional document examiners were unable to conclusively say one way or the other whether these signatures were actually those of the same people whose signatures were on file with voter registration records.
All absentee voting must end. It can never be validated as the actual choices made by the registered voter with the right to cast a secret ballot retained.
https://twitter.com/thatjerkme/status/1335352622996467714
Its Happening?
Every day it's happening!
The challenge is getting the MSM to stop brainwashing people into thinking it isn't!
We are the media. MSN will NEVER report this truth. They are our existential enemies. Take narrative dissemination into your own hands and banish the thought of EVER relying on these cunts in the slightest!
Here's the catch 22:
So long as MSM belts out propaganda, a large portion of the population is brainwashed to believe it.
Either we find a way for journalism to "get real", or we continue inching towards a real civil war.
It's not us that needs to be convinced. It's all the TDS stricken smooth brains that think voter fraud is justifiable against 'orange hitler'
It's a disgusting situation, and I'm not sure what the solution is.
Perhaps the government should force any TV channel to have both left and right leaning hosts on their shows. Could be a solution.
I don't think it's possible. It'd still be uniparty. Fox is "right leaning" and they insert the word "baseless" or "unfounded" before every single election fraud allegation.
Plus fucking one to this.
It's hard enough convincing my own wife that fox news doesn't have to tell her something for it to be real.
That will only happen when people stop taking them seriously
It sounds like those numbers are the Duplicate Ballots. When a ballot doesn't scan, they copy it and mark the original with the duplicate ballot serial number.
They went through the originals, pulled the duplicates, and edit: 2% didn't match (for 3% spread) in the first 100 sample. Idk about later larger sample but I bet that's what you heard about.
Maricopa County stopped counting the larger 2500 sample at 1526 with no explanation. The first sample of 100 ballots that found the 2 Trump ballots switched to Biden were pulled from the duplicate ballots group, as you said. But Maricopa County did not use the duplicate ballots group for the larger sample count (probably looking for a less problematic sample.)
Kelli Ward's video below mentions both 7 and 9 abnormal ballots found out of the 1526 (dunno why the discrepancy.) Anyway, the abnormal ballots have been sealed by the judge so nobody can see them. So much for transparency, as the judge promised. Ward said yesterday not to be discouraged if they lose this one, they intend to appeal to the AZ supreme court.
https://twitter.com/AZGOP/status/1334892553611616256
I wonder if the democrat "expert" didn't even think the cheating could be that bad. Dems are always "a little fraud and corruption won't hurt"
I think you two are talking about two different samples that they did.
The 2,500 was another case.
This is specific to this: https://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=1930 Page 7
Some of those twitter replies are so infuriating
"DER THIS DOENS'T PROVE FRAUD COS SIGNATURES CHANGES OVER TIMES!!! DERR"
I hate it. I hate these people. I hate what's going on. I hate seeing so many people completely brainwashed from reality so long as it hurts "orange hitler"
There is always a portion who experience cognitive dissonance because of rooted beliefs. It's frustrating but also realize that many of them are just terribly ignorant and not actually ideologues, despite appearances.
Grew up in the city and can confirm. Took years of my beliefs being challenged before I realized paying more in taxes can't change the weather.
CDC now reporting signature mutation is a symptom of COVID.
Maricopa County was the beta test in 2016 - Krysten Sinema.
So True. No way that Lesbo won.
STICKY
Nevada is fucked because they made us sign an electronic screen for the first time ever. It always used to be signing paper.
Who in the fuck has ever signed a consistent or correct signature on an electronic screen?
I had to sign an electronic screen with my finger while wearing a nitrile glove.
It looked like this:
Then they looked at you and said, "Matches."
Basically. I don't remember what I said but I commented on how bad it was and he said it didn't matter. We have ID required and mine is REAL ID so at least there was that to go off of in my case. At the same place in 2018 a lady was trying to register with her maiden name after divorcing and moving but hadn't updated her ID and they denied her. *shrug*
*Of course it doesn't matter what our precinct does when all the fucks in Madison and Milwaukee do whatever they want.
This happened in NY too! Signature on file was signed on paper, flat. I had to sign an iPad at an angle with my finger.
In NY the only validation is with signatures. Are you kidding me? With this set up, pretty much either party could get enough ballots tossed if they wanted to.
This is getting embarrassing.
And I like them, but I feel like they're super Tick Tock.
All that's needed is signature checks. Check signatures, Trump wins.
The dominion shifts and stuffed ballots are true, but they're hard to prove and explain to normal people.
Inform people the states didn't check signatures and they'll know it's fraud. There's no explanation for not checking signatures other than fraud and everybody knows it.
That video from ATL was "tick tock" from Lin Wood....
a video which has nothing to do with any of the tick tocking regarding the conspiracy stuff (i mean it literally not pejoratively)
Sure it does. Ballot stuffing at a coordinated time...?
I like all three of them. I think Barnes can have a huge ego and it clashes with people like Lin who has a huge personality and is very much a public opinion worker. I wish he would cool it because as much as Lin has maybe pushed an Idea here or there that is questionable its very clear that his approach is much more energizing at getting people out there and fighting than a more measured one (see pence's shit rally yesterday). Getting people emotionally invested is just as important as being as factual and defensible as possible.
Except Wood is part of the group trying to get people to sit out elections. That's throwing a temper tantrum, not energizing people to actually win anything.
Yes, I like Barnes, but Gus, remember when he was taking credit for sandman, and then nick sandman himself tweeted that Barnes didn’t represent him?
Barnes never took credit for Sandmann he was always a lawyer for the other students and made that clear whenever the topic came up. The legal strategies weren't even similar between the two cases.
Good they need pushback
Ive been following barnes for awhile. Hes smart but has a HUGE ego. He had never liked Lin and has been vocal about him since early summer(I think he has issues with how he handled kenosha kyle). Sydney Powell is a mystery to me, idk why he doesn't like her, maybe her tiktok attitude?
Because Barnes believes Powell is pushing for stuff that's way too conspiratory, and even if it's true, it's hurting us right now because it gives people like the GA gov and SoS a reason to ignore our reasonable requests. President Trump personally asked Barnes to help, and we should really trust the President's judgement over Powell's and Wood's.
I know you guys like Elon, but Lin Wood lost the defamation trail against him simply because he didn't introduce into evidence the rest of the twitter thread.
The jury said they couldn't be sure who Elon was even talking about from the one tweet.
Lin talks big to get settlements, worked great for Sandman, but he's not a good trial lawyer. I hope he manages to get wins in these suits, but I don't have much confidence.
Yes, I like him as well but you have to be careful for his hot takes on things. In terms of Lin, there's a lot to be concerned about. And Powell, you're right it's the tick tocking even though Barnes likes her in general.
I don't know why they never bother to post sources. A zillion people ask in his comment thread, no reply, nobody can show a source. I don't know what didn't match - ballot markings to recorded votes, signature envelope to voter roll signature? What? It's bizarre how many of these lawyers just post shit and never back it up.
That's what I hate about GatewayPundit. All their tweets are like "25,000 votes found switched from Trump to Biden in Wisconsin. Trump has now won the state" but then there's no source and you never hear anything about it again.
With Barnes Specifically he more or less uses twitter as a public notepad. It's basically for his personal use but he lets us see it.
CLARIFICATION: THE COURT ORDER IS TO CHECK DUPLICATED BALLOTS. There is a machine that tries to guess voter intent when the ballot couldnt be read by the normal scanner. So maybe a ballot was marked TRUMP but the bubble wasnt full. They put it through the machine. Machine says "this is a BIDEN vote." That was what was counted.
They are specifically checking this type of ballot. Duplicated ballots.
EDIT: Please fact check me, I'm giving my non-professional understanding of what's happening. Here is Barnes talking about it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npV-J4btsbY
I'm fairly confident that this is a different audit.
they got court orders on two different things - the duplicate ballots, and signature matching.
Somebody needs to wake up Governor Douchey.
He's busy ignoring President Trumps phone calls. He's such a Douchebag.
Just went to his Twitter page, he is dismissing Lin and Sidney as being crack pots and is vehemently against them.
So ill take all his opinions here on out with a grain of salt.
Same. Barnes does have some good points, but he fails to understand what Lin was getting at during his moment at the conference. If the GOP isn't going to support President Trump and address the fuckery that happened on November 3rd, we are going to have to force them to back the President and make them address the Georgian's concerns. If that means people have to play chicken to get it done, so be it.
Make that call after we sort out the general. Not before, because it discourages turnout even after we win.
President Trump personally asked Barnes to work his cases. We can't become so attached to Powell and Wood that we elevate them to the same level as President Trump. Their cases are captivating, but they aren't gospel.
We are at war. Each lawyer may be working different aspects and different strategies which is fine. But if there starts to be mud slinging towards people that are fighting the same overall battle, it gives me pause for great concern.
There is too big of a battle to be fought and its even worse if you are attacking own side with "friendly fire"
To play devil's advocate, it's the same from Barnes' perspective. While not mud-slinging, if he believes Powell and Barnes are doing harm to President Trump's case, it's really in his best interest to distance them as much as possible.
The court of public opinion is irrelevant in a court room. Sidney has officially been given distance from the Trump campaign. So the cases are already distanced. They need to be decided on the facts brought before them. Not some random case being worked on the other side of the country.
Theoretically that's the case, but courts are unfortunately highly influenced by public opinion. In addition, it's corrupting the pressure we're putting on the legislatures and giving them the political ammunition to write off the fraud as a right-wing Russiagate conspiracy theory.
Than when they day of reckoning comes soon, they should be targeted for removal and sent to Gitmo for aiding and abetting after the fact. If they can no longer rule impartially and objectively and only as partisan activists than they are a threat to the very fabric of our constitution, have violated there oaths, and need to be relieved of duty immediately.
I agree. But we have to play with the cards we've been dealt right now.
Barnes is pulling so much weight this election. He doesn't get near enough love.
Apparently he was asked directly to intervene in GA and had been there for at least 2 weeks working for the president.
He also drafted our PA election contest suit. The dude's sharp.
Court doc in question:
https://www.clerkofcourt.maricopa.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=1930
Page 7 specifically.
100% of these ballots were considered accurate by the initial signature verification in AZ. Even the Democrats yesterday said 11% of these CANNOT be verified based on the information available.
How and why the fuck were they ALL approved on election night?
They were approved because the Dems thought that we were going to cheat easily and not get caught.
Here's the link with the rest of the story: https://twitter.com/kelliwardaz/status/1334848746044133378
Wake me up when something comes out of all of this.
wdefhjm,k,jmnhgfd
Arizona (11 electoral votes), Georgia (16 electoral votes), win the straightforward case in Wisconsin (10 electoral votes!!! Pedes, we’re at 269 electoral votes and Trump wins!!!!
https://twitter.com/thatjerkme/status/1335352622996467714
SO we have basically won now? GA and AZ are sure things. NV and WI are 90% with us. They just need these double votes and absentee ballots thrown out.
That gives us 274.
Am I correct Pedes?
wdfghmjk,kjmnhbgfd
Now do this in 49 other states... 500+ electoral votes.
11% is not really a "little" amount. That's insane!
ROUNDING UP COMMIES.
This is on Mr. BARNES'S Twitter account. Has additional info from auditor
Man, Kelli Ward announced this yesterday...I posted here...the problem is that the law wasn't even followed as to who is reviewing them. The whole thing is all fucked up... I hate riggers
Mother of God! There isn't a single election in any state that isn't suspect.
The voting machines should not have been used, but THIS is how they tried to steal the election.
Um, sweaty. Democrat judges have already screamed, "debunked," at the top of their lungs.
kek sweaty
an oldie
Do we know if Robert Barnes is a credible source or if his claim in this tweet is collaborated by others?
He's credible. He worked for the president this past month in GA and has been a relatively well known lawyer since he worked the Wesley Snipes tax case years ago.
Check out the Viva Barnes show they do every sunday on youtube at 7est-ish. They go over all the legal happenings for the week.
Very credible.
I see what you did there!
It just takes 1....but damn i want that 1 to hapoen soon
anyone keeping track of this? Is this the the court order that was part of this case that State Supreme Court dismissed yesterday?
https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Order-2.pdf
or are there 2 diff lawsuits in Arizona?
I don’t think so. Per the document you linked, it says Maricopa Superior court not AZ Supreme Court. Also, watched Kellie Ward twitter update from yesterday—which came before the ruling was issued— and she didn’t expect to win at this level anyway (Democrat appointed judge) and that she was expecting to appeal anyway
thanks
This is good news
So what will happen with this information?
I love it but where is the sauce?
Read the decision here: https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/Order-2.pdf
And who's getting a stern letter?
Another "GIANT" win!!!! We love WINNING.......
OOHHHH GODDAMN THATS SPICY
This is beyond evil that these cheats have been allowed to certify their fraud elections.
Hot Damn!!!
Are you getting the impression that no matter how conclusive the evidence is of massive election fraud is, it doesn’t seem to matter. A video in Fulton County. Phony ballots up the wazoo in multiple states multiple states stopped counting at the same time statistical evidence of fraud a system being used in 28 states which was developed to commit election fraud flipping votes ballots shipped across state lines
PREBONKED!!!
Wow! That’s a huge number. Hopefully someone will come to their senses and allow a full audit. AZ could be first then others will follow