603 A court ordered statistically significant sample of Arizona's mail in ballots found 11% of the accepted ballots did NOT match according to the Democrats' own expert. That is thirty times more illegal ballots than the margin of victory. Georgia, Pennsylvania & Nevada likely worse. (twitter.com) posted 133 days ago by clampie 133 days ago by clampie +603 / -0 17 comments share 17 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (17) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 7 ▼ – USMCMAGA 7 points 133 days ago +7 / -0 BUT NOBODY HAS THE FUCKING BALLS TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT! permalink save report block reply ▲ 7 ▼ – sjriver 7 points 133 days ago +7 / -0 The amount of fraud is mindboggling. It's so big and so pervasive that people don't believe it. That's part of the problem. Your average person can't come to grips with the fact that elections have been rigged for decades n permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – BirchTBarlow 2 points 133 days ago +2 / -0 Is it that hard to believe when no one had heard of Barack Obama in 2004, but he shows up at the DNC with buzz that he might be the next president, and becomes president just four years later? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 6 ▼ – PlateOwner 6 points 133 days ago +6 / -0 Matt Braynard just lit a cigar and laughed. permalink save report block reply ▲ 6 ▼ – TallGlassofMelonade 6 points 133 days ago +6 / -0 Is this the 1000 ballot sample? permalink save report block reply ▲ 6 ▼ – deleted 6 points 133 days ago +6 / -0 ▲ 6 ▼ – clampie [S] 6 points 133 days ago +6 / -0 Breaking. Looks like it's Kelly Ward's suit. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – Nowsthetime 2 points 133 days ago +2 / -0 Yep, me too. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – KRM944 3 points 133 days ago +3 / -0 Is the logjam breaking up? permalink save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – clampie [S] 4 points 133 days ago +4 / -0 GOP legislators in PA clearly saw the fraud and they certified the results. This won't change AZ. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 9 ▼ – KRM944 9 points 133 days ago +9 / -0 “If one falls, they all fall” Steve Bannon permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – MakeAmericaLegendary 2 points 133 days ago +2 / -0 It will when it reaches SCOAZ. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – clampie [S] 1 point 133 days ago +1 / -0 That hasn't happened in the other states when it reached their SCs. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – MakeAmericaLegendary 2 points 133 days ago +2 / -0 The only one we've really reached is PA. AZ has a very conservative SC. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – clampie [S] 1 point 133 days ago +1 / -0 WI and MI SCs have ruled against the Trump campaign, too. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – MakeAmericaLegendary 3 points 133 days ago +3 / -0 WI told us to go through the lower courts first and seem to signal that they'll rule in our favor. MI's case was moot at the time. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – lst1194 2 points 133 days ago +2 / -0 They also said there wasnt enough evidence or marks to make them void. permalink save report block reply
BUT NOBODY HAS THE FUCKING BALLS TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT!
The amount of fraud is mindboggling. It's so big and so pervasive that people don't believe it.
That's part of the problem. Your average person can't come to grips with the fact that elections have been rigged for decades n
Is it that hard to believe when no one had heard of Barack Obama in 2004, but he shows up at the DNC with buzz that he might be the next president, and becomes president just four years later?
Matt Braynard just lit a cigar and laughed.
Is this the 1000 ballot sample?
Breaking. Looks like it's Kelly Ward's suit.
Yep, me too.
Is the logjam breaking up?
GOP legislators in PA clearly saw the fraud and they certified the results. This won't change AZ.
“If one falls, they all fall” Steve Bannon
It will when it reaches SCOAZ.
That hasn't happened in the other states when it reached their SCs.
The only one we've really reached is PA. AZ has a very conservative SC.
WI and MI SCs have ruled against the Trump campaign, too.
WI told us to go through the lower courts first and seem to signal that they'll rule in our favor. MI's case was moot at the time.
They also said there wasnt enough evidence or marks to make them void.