4147
Comments (274)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
one_out_of_many 2 points ago +6 / -4

Another point, how often have you been out in public and think, "oh shoot, is that my buddy over there? ... HEY .... HEY JIM.... HEY JIM

and the guy stares back at you? or, ever been that person?

The logic of this is laughable. I'm an optimist, but we have to use our brains folks. The picture rethek made above is accurate, the ladies are two different ages, complexion, fingers, finger tips, marrage, mask wearing style.

I love our mods, but this is probably the one time I would have to say, "whoa" and ask you to relook at this this for the sake of the reputation of this site and our integrity.

3
MAGA_APN 3 points ago +3 / -0

Any woman on here would know that you can absolutely not trust the hairstyle. All it takes is a dye job, blow dryer door a bad hair day to make a girls hair look completely different.

2
BeefCastle69 2 points ago +7 / -5

Everything you just stated is false. Same mask, same eyes, same part in the hair, same bracelet, same shape, same lanyard. These are images from videos A MONTH APART, people on here have already run it through facial recognition software and it was a match. Lol " she doesn't have a ring on it can't be her..." Seriously? That's your logic?

1
one_out_of_many 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its conjecture. To sticky conjecture is the issue, dont label with a sticky if its not true/not proven does a disservice to everythung we stand for.