Pedes, Former Law Enforcement. That's not Elena Parent in the Election Photo.
Observations:
The arms are too fat on the woman in the Election Photo, you can make comparisons to the arm structure here, although it is an older photo, it shows an Ecto-Mesomorph Bodytype, whereas the woman in the film/photo is a Meso-Endomorph, leaning Endomorph: https://www.thecrier.net/image_6a7f9944-a835-11e0-832d-001cc4c002e0.html Elena did not lose 20-30 lbs between Election Day, and change scientific body types, before her presence at the hearings. In fact, Elena's weight appears consistent over the past number of years, and her arms are relatively toned, as she is naturally an Ecto-Mesomorph.
Elena Parent has a natural irregular curl pattern to her hair, damage from peroxide bleach, on 2/3 of her length, and a persistent flare outward at the shoulder level, existing across numerous photos. Her hair ends in more stressed/ damaged hair and split ends. She does not have a taper, and shows no apparent layers. She's a Mom, and a "Career Gal", her hair is not a primary concern, it's secondary. (Your hair looks like shit Elena)
If you examine Elena's facial structure, the orbital sockets, brow ridge, and high angular cheek bones, create in combination a rectangular or squaring effect of her eyebrows, and the area around her eyes. This is consistent with the angular squaring of her jawbone, giving her more of a squared/ box angular face over all. Her eyes are set more deeply into this bone/facial structure than the woman in the Election Photo. Elena's facial structure is very distinct.
The woman in the Election Photo is heavier set than Elena, the arms and midsection do not match in that she is significantly heavier. The woman in the Election photo also has a more rounded facial structure on the edges around the eyes and cheek bones, lacking the same boxing of the orbital/brow structure, and also demonstrating a larger forehead. The woman in the Election Photo and film also has more of a peaked arch at the apex of her larger forehead at the hairline. This is distinctly different than Elena Parent.
The woman in the photo has naturally straighter hair, and has layered hair, demonstrating a tapered cut, which hangs more inwardly curling, which is opposite of Elena's natural flare outward. This hair is clearly thicker, and longer than Elena Parent's hair, and is clearly lacking the split ends/ frazzled/ damaged look.
Both women appear Caucasian and of Central/ Northern European Ancestry. Both are natural brunettes, who use hair bleach and dye. Facial recognition software would fail to confirm they are the same woman easily. Anyone who says they've used software successfully to create probability match is being dishonest. Any other trained observer/ investigator should also be able to make the same confirmations of difference between the two women.
Don't get trapped in this rabbit hole, or promote it. It's a distraction, and it makes us look bad, discrediting our Group Source/ Group Intelligence Capabilities. We're far better at analysis than this.
Caught that bitch !!!
Hijack for visibility:
Pedes, Former Law Enforcement. That's not Elena Parent in the Election Photo.
Observations:
The arms are too fat on the woman in the Election Photo, you can make comparisons to the arm structure here, although it is an older photo, it shows an Ecto-Mesomorph Bodytype, whereas the woman in the film/photo is a Meso-Endomorph, leaning Endomorph: https://www.thecrier.net/image_6a7f9944-a835-11e0-832d-001cc4c002e0.html Elena did not lose 20-30 lbs between Election Day, and change scientific body types, before her presence at the hearings. In fact, Elena's weight appears consistent over the past number of years, and her arms are relatively toned, as she is naturally an Ecto-Mesomorph.
Further side profile image analysis: https://i.maga.host/FWv0aHC.png
Elena Parent has a natural irregular curl pattern to her hair, damage from peroxide bleach, on 2/3 of her length, and a persistent flare outward at the shoulder level, existing across numerous photos. Her hair ends in more stressed/ damaged hair and split ends. She does not have a taper, and shows no apparent layers. She's a Mom, and a "Career Gal", her hair is not a primary concern, it's secondary. (Your hair looks like shit Elena)
If you examine Elena's facial structure, the orbital sockets, brow ridge, and high angular cheek bones, create in combination a rectangular or squaring effect of her eyebrows, and the area around her eyes. This is consistent with the angular squaring of her jawbone, giving her more of a squared/ box angular face over all. Her eyes are set more deeply into this bone/facial structure than the woman in the Election Photo. Elena's facial structure is very distinct.
The woman in the Election Photo is heavier set than Elena, the arms and midsection do not match in that she is significantly heavier. The woman in the Election photo also has a more rounded facial structure on the edges around the eyes and cheek bones, lacking the same boxing of the orbital/brow structure, and also demonstrating a larger forehead. The woman in the Election Photo and film also has more of a peaked arch at the apex of her larger forehead at the hairline. This is distinctly different than Elena Parent.
The woman in the photo has naturally straighter hair, and has layered hair, demonstrating a tapered cut, which hangs more inwardly curling, which is opposite of Elena's natural flare outward. This hair is clearly thicker, and longer than Elena Parent's hair, and is clearly lacking the split ends/ frazzled/ damaged look.
Both women appear Caucasian and of Central/ Northern European Ancestry. Both are natural brunettes, who use hair bleach and dye. Facial recognition software would fail to confirm they are the same woman easily. Anyone who says they've used software successfully to create probability match is being dishonest. Any other trained observer/ investigator should also be able to make the same confirmations of difference between the two women.
Don't get trapped in this rabbit hole, or promote it. It's a distraction, and it makes us look bad, discrediting our Group Source/ Group Intelligence Capabilities. We're far better at analysis than this.